Vivo to Exit IPL as Sponsor?: BCCI to Take Call as Anti-China Sentiment Grows in the Country

Must Read

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

“Pro-Enforcement Bias” Towards Foreign Arbitral Awards Domestically, in light of Vijay Karia and Ors. V. Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi S.R.L and Ors.

International Arbitration faces challenges domestically due to unharmonized local laws for enforcement. Often it may occur that an award...

Follow us

The Indian Premier League (IPL 2020) season this year seems to be jinxed. It is already struggling as it is ‘indefinitely suspended’ due to the pandemic. At present, they have another issue at hand. The Indo-Chinese border clash at Galwan valley recently has aggravated the issue. Anti-China sentiments are growing high in India. Amidst this, all eyes are on BCCI. People are calling out BCCI to remove all its Chinese sponsors.

There is a deep Chinese connection in Indian Cricket. Vivo, a Chinese phone manufacturer, is the title sponsor of the IPL. Apart from Vivo, there are other sponsors with Chinese investments as well.

Growing Anti-China Sentiments in The Country

On June 15th, 2020, India and China engaged in a faceoff in the Galwan valley in Ladakh. It was considered the deadliest clash in the past four decades. Twenty Indian soldiers, including the Commanding Officer, lost their lives. After the conflict between India and China, anti-China sentiments were growing high. Due to this, the calls for ‘ban and boycott Chinese products’ are growing louder.

IPL’S Title Sponsorship Deal with Vivo

In July 2017, Vivo bagged the IPL title rights for five years. The deal was worth Rs. 2199 Crore, which is 267% premium over the base price. Vivo pays Rs 440 Crore annually. IPL is the most rewarding T20 competition in the world. It is because of the coupling of Vivo’s contract with Star India’s five-year media rights. However, the BCCI has said that they will put the demands of the country first. So, if the government puts a complete ban on Chinese products and sponsors, they will follow it.

BCCI Has Other Chinese Connections

Apart from Vivo, BCCI has other contracts with Chinese sponsors. Chinese investors like PayTM, Dream 11, BYJU’s, and Swiggy are on board. Paytm, a payment app is the title sponsor of Indian Cricket. It is the main sponsor for tournaments held in India and domestic Cricket. Alibaba, a Chinese e-commerce giant, is one of its investors. Alibaba has 37.15 per cent stake in Paytm.

Tencent is one of the biggest video game companies in the world. It has a majority stake in Dream 11.

Dream 11 is an associate sponsor of BCCI and IPL. It is the IPL’s online fantasy league partner since 2019. All these companies are on the Board’s list of sponsors.

Swiggy, a popular food delivery app, is an associate sponsor of IPL. They too have an investment by Tencent. Tencent has a 5.27 per cent stake in Swiggy.

BYJU’s bought the jersey sponsoring rights of the Indian cricket team last year for Rs.1079 Crore. Even BYJU’s has a Chinese connection. Tencent Holdings have invested millions into this App. However, BCCI believes that both BYJU’s and PayTM are Indian brands. Hence, BCCI will review its contracts with Vivo, Dream 11, and Swiggy.

This shows how deep the Chinese connect is in Indian Cricket. 42% of the money goes to the Government of India as taxes. It helps the economy of the country. These contracts with Chinese investments have been quite beneficial. But the BCCI has said that they will end the contracts if the government decides to put a blanket ban. They will definitely have a difficult time coming to a decision.

The Letter of Threat By The Chamber of Trade and Industry (CTI)

The CTI Convenor Brijesh Goyal wrote a letter to the BCCI. In this letter, they asked the BCCI to end sponsorship deals with Chinese firms. He said that if they do not do this, all the traders will boycott IPL and all other international matches in India.

Meanwhile, the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) is also reviewing its Chinese sponsorships. There is a possibility that they might cancel these sponsorships. A meeting of IOA’s executives was convened to take the call on suspending an agreement with Li-Ning. Li-Ning is a Chinese company that sponsors play-kits.

Stance of BCCI

The decision to review the deal comes a day after BCCI treasurer Arun Dhumal said that they would always put the country first. Moreover, Chinese advertisers also spend a lot on advertisements that air during IPL and other BCCI events. According to an estimate, in IPL 2019, the advertisers spent Rs. 500 Crore. Vivo alone pent 150 Crore during the two-month event.

BCCI has put forward another question. Even if they cancel the deal with Vivo, who will replace Vivo and pay Rs. 440 Crore?

Without such support and investment, Cricket cannot thrive or survive commercially.


To date, the government has not come up with any direct guidelines. The BCCI has decided to follow the guidelines of the government. Despite the fate of IPL 2020 remaining uncertain, the sponsorship deals are long term. Sponsorship deals are very vital for IPL and International Cricket as well.

Sundar Raman is the former IPL Chief Operating Officer. He stated in his paper that 18% of the cricket revenue is generated through sponsorship. In the case of IPL, he stated that sponsorship makes 30% of the annual revenue. Further, broadcasting deals make 65% of the revenue.

However, if the BCCI decides to end the deals, it will severely affect their coffers. Now all the eyes are on the BCCI as to what they will finally decide. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

Uttarakhand High Court Directed State Authorities To Frame SOP Regarding Kumbh Mela 2021

Noticing the commencement date of Kumbh Mela 2021 amid pandemic from 27 February 2021, the Uttarakhand High Court on Monday expressed concern with regard to organizing and conducting of the Mela and directed State Authorities to discuss and resolve the logistical problems which can come in organizing the Mela during the pandemic time.

Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Mahindra Finance, Being a Purely Private Body: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court reiterated that Writ Petition against the purely private body is not maintainable and dismissed the petition which was filed against Mahindra Finance Bank as Arif Khan v. Branch Manager Mahindra Finance Sultanpur & Another.

Publication of Notices for Inter-Faith Marriages No Longer Mandatory: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has passed a landmark judgment that likely brings relief to inter-faith marriage. The Court on Wednesday said that the mandatory publication of Notices of Inter-Faith marriages will now be optional to protect the Privacy and Liberty of the Couple. The Court observed that the publication of the notice would “invade the fundamental rights of liberty and privacy”. Therefore, it has made it optional for the couple, they can now request in form of writing to a marriage officer to publish or not to publish a notice regarding the marriage.

Bombay High Court to NIA: Consider Health and Age of Varavara Rao Before Opposing His Bail Plea

The Bombay HC on Wednesday observed that ‘we are all humans’ and asked the National Investigation Agency and the Maharashtra Government to consider the health and age of the Telugu poet-activist Varavara Rao before making submissions in response to his bail plea application on medical grounds.

Supreme Court Agrees To Examine Centre’s Plea To Keep Adultery a Crime in Armed Forces

The Centre appealed to the Supreme court on Wednesday, pleading that the 2018 judgment of decriminalizing adultery under IPC must not apply to the armed forces. The Supreme Court in a path-breaking verdict in 2018 decriminalized adultery and declared all its provisions unconstitutional as it diminishes the value of women, but maintained that it continues to be a ground for divorce.

Supreme Court Examines the Pollution in Yamuna River for the Second Time

The Supreme Court on Wednesday made a second attempt to clean the Yamuna river by taking a Suo Moto Cognizance of significantly high levels of ammonia water discharged from neighbouring states like Haryana into Delhi.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -