Visionary Dream to free Politics from Crime

Must Read

The Right to Information and its Working of 15 years

On 12th October 2020, RTI finished fifteen years since its commencement. The question remains whether the legislation stands up to...

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

Follow us

Inextricable Bond between Crime and Politics

The relation between politics and crime has grown even more stronger with the increase in the lust for power, money and muscle. To safely undertake criminal activities, politics was often idealised as a safe haven to protect oneself from the wrath of the authorities. The infamous gangster of Mumbai “Arun Gawli” entered politics and contested elections. He was convicted for the murder of Shiv Sena corporator and is presently serving life imprisonment. This brings us to the prevalent issue of “Criminalisation of Politics”. The politics in India has transformed from selfless work to self-centred work i.e. politics used as a platform to fulfil one’s personal ambitions. Under the pretense of social work and political activities, the presence of people with criminal background in politics has been on a sharp rise. According to the data of the Association of Democratic Reforms in 2014, 1,581 of total legislators have criminal cases pending against them. The staggering number depicts the dreadful condition of politics in India. This trend has many implications for Indian democracy. The use of money and muscle power has been a major cause of manipulating vulnerable electorates. The politicians with influence in any manner are regarded dangerous and are unhealthy for a democratic institution. They are likely to use their influence to get things done as per their whims and fancies which ultimately affects the people at large. It is said that the voter has the freedom to vote anyone, but the voter is also restricted to choose a lesser evil who would inflict mild harm as compared to the other option. But, there is optimism to counter this menace. Many public-spirited individuals and organisations have taken the issue to the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. Through the recent move to establish special courts to try criminal cases against MPs and MLAs and a lifetime ban on convicted politicians, a roadmap could be set to move towards the decriminalisation of politics in India.

Roadmap to Decriminalisation of Politics

The Guardian of the Constitution has unfailingly performed its responsibilities to do social welfare and shown activism to cleanse politics off crime. The first such hit by the judiciary was when it ordered to disqualify sitting MPs and MLAs convicted of a crime. This masterstroke was applauded and viewed as a dawn to a new India of the 21st Century. But, there are other issues that need urgent attention. The disqualification was a welcoming step, but one should not be satisfied with a small achievement when there are other challenges standing at the doorstep. To further take the step of cleansing politics, there is a need draw the attention on the petition filed by Ashwini Upadhyay in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. The petition centers on the roadmap that can be created to completely free politics from crime. This can be done by the “establishment of special courts to try MPs and MLAs for criminal cases” to “lifetime ban on a convicted person or to form political parties or become its office bearers”. The matter is pending in the court to which the Centre and Election Commission of India has been directed to find a viable scheme for the implementation of the same. The moot point here is: whether establishing special courts to try criminal cases against politicians is a viable option.

The viability of putting a burden on establishing new courts in already overburdened judiciary needs to be evaluated. There are issues ranging from relocating to courtrooms to try special criminal cases and shifting the pending cases to these newly established courtrooms. The administration would have to demarcate the accused persons on the basis of association in politics. Further, the monetary aspect would also be an impediment to ensuring the functioning of the courts. The budget allocation would be revised on its basis, and finally, Judges must be carefully appointed to try these cases. These could be some of the hindrances that may jeopardize the process, but these challenges must be addressed expeditiously. It may cause a little inconvenience but it will definitely reap the fruit of the all the labor and hard work. There are special courts to try company matters, administrative matters, therefore, establishing special courts shall not be much of a tedious task. There are bigger gains than losses here. If these courts are established and worked efficiently with transparency and no influence whatsoever then it will achieve milestones to create a crime-free politics. The legislators would also feel obligated to dissociate themselves from any criminal misconduct. Fast track courts are established to try heinous offenses to ensure speedy disposal of cases and quick and judicious dispensation of justice. These special courts would work as fast-track courts which will also reduce the burden of the pending cases languishing in courts.

A Hope for Change

There are other factors as well that is the empowerment of the electorates. The people in politics would awake from their dream of having a sense of ownership. The masses would feel empowered to directly report any case against politicians for any criminal misconduct. Earlier, the common belief or apprehension prevailed amongst the citizens that politicians are immune from any action. But, special courts can be an answer to this. The fast-track courts with a set deadline would make a person think before indulging in any unscrupulous activity. This sense of fear would be instilled only when the trials are conducted in these courts efficiently. Now, the ball is in Centre’s court. It is upon the Centre to show their commitment to free politics from crime and take initiative to come with a framework to execute this ambitious and foresighted vision which may ultimately result into a greater good for the entire nation.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Supreme Court Asks Petitioner to Approach Bombay High Court in PIL for CBI Probe in Disha Salian Case

On the 26th of October 2020, the Apex Court heard the PIL praying for a CBI probe into the death of Disha Salian. The...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -