Viability of Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Draft 2020

Must Read

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

Follow us

EIA is a tool to assess the social, environmental, and economic impact of any project before its operation. It helps in reducing the adverse effect on the environment by any project which leads to environmental protection. The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MOEF&CC) released Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) notification 2020. It would replace EIA notification 2006 and has been out in the public domain in March 2020. The current draft has received heavy criticism from environmentalists and economists. People have also petitioned to take back EIA 2020 as it would cause more harm than doing good to the environment. The new notification defined some terms which were not defined in 2006 notification.

Due to the COVID-19 crisis, it became impossible to follow any official deadline. The deadline for public objections and suggestions was till 22nd May 2020. The proposal was to keep the deadline till 10th August 2020 for the general public to give their views/suggestions. Yet, the final date of public feedback submission is 30th June 2020.

Ex Post Facto Approval

Environmental Clearance

There has always been opposition towards National Green Tribunal (NGT). However, the new EIA 2020 notification ignored the principle of environment clearance. It permitted post facto regulation of environmental violations. Therefore, the industries can get clearance for the project. Even if they have started working upon it without obtaining prior environmental clearances.

Environmental clearance is mandatory so that environmental, health and social concerns can be taken into account before starting any project. In the first place, it is a clear violation of the “precautionary principle” of environmental jurisprudence. On the contrary, it works on the principle of “pollute and pay”. Moreover, some areas are declared as ‘economically sensitive areas’ which would not be under mandatory environment clearance.

In addition to it, the number of projects have been increased which does not need the EIA process. In the name of ease of doing business, this draft would only damage the environment. The validity of the environmental clearances has also increased to 50 years from 30 years. Similarly, for the river valley project, it has increased to 10 years from 15 years. Any adverse consequences of any project could get unnoticed for a long period.

Stance of the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court gave a judgment which is concerning 3 industrial units in Gujarat. It stated that operating without environment clearances would be harmful to the environment. In April, the Supreme Court said that an “ecologically rational outlook” should be kept in mind for development. Also, environment compliance should not be seen as an obstacle but as a way of achieving sustainable development.

Vizag Gas Leak

On 7th May 2020, in Vishakhapatnam, a gas leak accident occurred which resulted in the death of many people. The LG Polymers India company was responsible for the gas leak. Later, it was found that it was running its petrochemical plant without appropriate environment clearance. Similarly, other projects can too violate environmental laws and then get approval. Moreover, it is not difficult for big companies/industries to violate the law and get away with it by paying penalties.

Public Consultancy

According to EIA notification 2006, there is a need for prior public consultations. It is needed before any project operation. There is a reduction of time for the public to submit their responses for any application of environmental clearance. It has been reduced from 30 days to 20 days. In 2006 notification, it was mandatory to complete the hearing process within 45 days, now it is 40 days.

The notification also proposes to enlarge the list of projects that do not need public consultation. It includes linear projects like pipelines, highways in border areas, building construction, etc. Public hearings would not be meaningful if an ample amount of time is not given to the people to express their views. Moreover, it would be worst for the people who could be affected by the project to not give their suggestions. Additionally, it would be a problem in areas where people are not well aware of the process. It would undermine the whole idea of transparency and credibility. By doing this government can refrain any project to go out for public scrutiny.

Compliance Report

Under 2006 notification the project proponent was required to submit a report every 6 months. The report shows that work is carried out according to the terms due to which permission was granted. Now, in 2020 notification the time for submitting the report has been extended to 1 year from 6 months. Due to this extension, many social, health and environmental issues can get unnoticed.

The authority would not get an appropriate opportunity to question them for violation. Moreover, only fines or punishment could be imposed at that time. But, the harm done to the environment cannot be restored. It would give them the chance to choose the data and add it to the report. Also, they can hide the rest of the data.

Bypassing EIA Process

The 2020 draft notification gives the central government the power to categorize projects as “strategic”. Information on strategic projects does not go out in the public domain. There would be no detailed scrutiny or public consultation for the construction projects up to 1,50,000 square meters. In case of any violation, it can only be reported by a government authority or suo motu by the project proponent. This is also a clear violation of the principles of natural justice.

After all, it is a bold step towards decentralising environmental governance. It gives power to the central government to constitute district regulatory that regulates the EIA process. In 2006 notification, to constitute such bodies there was prior need of consultation with the state government. Though, now there is no such prior requirement.

Conclusion

The government should come with a draft that can balance both development and the environment. The primary goal of environmental protection is set aside and the focus is on ease of business. The present notification is a clever move towards investment irrespective of what it does to the environment.

Moreover, the government should not allow investment at the cost of the essence of the EIA process. The government gave 60 days to the people to respond. Though, considering the present situation lockdown period should be excluded. The reason is that everyone cannot respond to it efficiently.

Besides, the government should focus on spreading awareness about the public hearing process. Also, its importance in the EIA process. It a misconception that easing environmental regulations would contribute towards economic growth. In reality, India is at the 5th position in the Global Climate Risk Index and that is an alarming position to be at. India is vulnerable to these climate change. So, hindering environmental protection would harm the environment.

Recently, the advent of Cyclone Nisgara and Cyclone Amphan which caused destruction are the prime examples of climate change effects. Taking advantage of the pandemic the government is all set to clear their all projects. If this notification would be passed it would remove the environmental accountability of the industries/companies. In conclusion, I would like to say that economic revival is important. Yet, it should not come at the cost of compromising the environment.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Gujarat High Court Directs To Register Name of Petitioners in the Society Records as Owners of Property, as per Will

A single-judge bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Justice Biren Vaishnav, because probate wasn’t necessary and that the petitioners were entitled to...

If No Complaint Is Filed, No Further Orders Are Required To Be Passed: Telangana High Court

Excerpt In Matlakunta Sundaramma vs The State Of Telangana, on January 8, 2021, the Telangana High Court decided that there is no requirement of passing...

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -