UAPA – State’s Machinery to Criminalize Dissent

Must Read

The Right to Information and its Working of 15 years

On 12th October 2020, RTI finished fifteen years since its commencement. The question remains whether the legislation stands up to...

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

Follow us

The amendments in the anti-terror law have given the union arbitrary power to curb freedom and infringe the rights of the citizen.

The Constitution Sixteenth (Amendment) Act, 1963, which amended clauses 2, 3, and 4 of Article 19 of the Indian constitution, has paved the way for the enactment of UAPA. Empowering the central government to enact any legislation imposing reasonable restriction on rights bestowed under Article 19 sub-clause (a)[freedom of speech and expression]; (b) [assemble peaceably and without arms]; (c) [form associations or unions] of clause (1) in the interest of the sovereignty and the integrity of the nation. The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act was first passed in 1967, which provided government power to impose ‘reasonable restrictions’ on the fundamental right to association confirmed under Article 19 of the Indian Constitution. Before the enactment of UAPA, 1967, a resolution was passed by the National Integration Council (NIC) headed by the Prime Minister. The NIC urge the parliament to frame a law to tackle unlawful activities and unlawful organisations.

The UAPA of 1967 can broadly be categorized into three primary objectives. 

  • Declaration of an association as unlawful.
  • Penalty for being a member of an unlawful association.
  • Penalty for dealing with the funds of an unlawful association.

However, the Act has been amended seven times, with the recent amendment in 2019, to incorporate the changing technique of terrorism, from shifting the burden of proof to making an extraterritorial arrest. Before 2019, UAPA dealt with unlawful activities and terrorist acts. It banned unlawful organisations as well as terrorist organisations. Moreover, the parliament enacted two alternative laws to deal with terrorism, namely, Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act – TADA and Prevention of Terrorist Act, 2002 – POTA. However, both the laws were repealed on the ground that the statutes were misused, overused, and abused, but the new amendments in the UAPA are in the lines of these repealed laws.

Prominent Amendments in 2019

The significant amendments made in 2019, in the parent Act of 1967 include: First, the Designation of an individual as “terrorist”. The parliament amended the section 35 and 36 of chapter VI, which empowered the Central government to tag an individual as “terrorist” if he/she: commits or participate in terrorist activities, prepare for terrorism, encourage terrorism or otherwise involved in terrorism. 

Second, the amended Act amended the section 25 and has empowered the NIA to conduct a raid and the seizure of properties that are suspected to be linked to terrorist activities, by taking the sanction of the Director-General of NIA. Before the 2019 amendment, the NIA officers were required to take the permission of DGP of the state for raid and seizure of the properties. This very amendment in section 25 seems to attack the federal structure of the nation.

Third, the recent amendments, apart from the officers of the status of Deputy Superintendent or Assistant Commissioner of Police or above, have additionally empowered the officers of the NIA, of the rank of Inspector or above, to investigate cases under section 43.

Fourth, the amended Act adds another treaty to the existing nine treaties recorded in a schedule of the Act. The newly added treaty is the International Convention for Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism (2005). Now, any act which would come under the scope of the treaty mentioned above would term as terrorist Act. 

Analysis

The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment Act, 2019, is yet again another machinery to curb the dissenting voice of the nation. Despite the searing opposition to the bill, it was passed in the parliament. The law got criticised mainly on two grounds. First, the new amendments undermine Human Rights. Second, the new bill undermines the federal structure of the nation. 

The power vesting on the union to designate an individual as a “terrorist”, seems to be a problematic provision, as the Act fails to define what constitutes terrorism. The vagueness in the fundamentals of the Act means a massive discretionary power in the hands of the union and its investigative authorities to bring anyone in the domain of the “terrorist offence”. Moreover, the criteria for designation an individual is the same as that of an organisation. This means the Act fails to recognise that an individual, unlike an organisation, has their fundamentals rights enshrined under Part III of the Constitution. Further, the terrorist tag on an individual without any trial would curtail the right to reputation and right to life with dignity guaranteed under Article 21. As there is no prescribed guideline, as what will happen to a person designated as a terrorist, it may lead to a social boycott of the individual. Also, the 2019 amendment is conflicting with the principle of “innocent until proven”, which is a universal human right under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1967.

Conclusion

The law enacted to combat terror in the nation is a threat to its citizens. As it is capable enough to be misused as other laws such as MISA, POTA, TADA, which were repealed. However, the recent amendment in the UAPA is on the same line as the repealed law and is a threat to democracy. As it can be speculated, through the recent arrests of the students, activists, and journalists who do not comply with the government. The law is used to curb the voice of the dissenters. The law is a threat to free speech guaranteed under the Fundamental Rights of the Indian Constitution.

References

  1. Anushka Singh: “Criminalising Dissent Consequences of UAPA,” Economics & Political Weekly, Sep. 22, 2012.
  2. “Designating Individual as Terrorist,” Economics & Political Weekly, Aug. 10, 2019.
  3. Siddharth Varadarajan, “Allowing the State to Designate Someone as a ‘Terrorist’ Without Trial is Dangerous,” https://thewire.in/rights/uapa-bjp-terrorist-amit-shah-nia, Aug. 02, 2019.
  4. “The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment Bill,” 2019, “https://www.prsindia.org/billtrack/unlawful-activities-prevention-amendment-bill-2019,
  5. Naorem Anuja, “The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment Act,” https://scio.uk/wp-admin/post.php?post=3617&action=edit, Apr. 20, 2019.

This Article is written by Priya Singh, Student at West Bengal, National University of Juridical Sciences.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by the Exporters Association before the...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -