THE TREND OF RISING RIGHT-WING PARTIES: CREED OF ‘PROTECTIONISM’ VIS-À-VIS RELIGIOUS BIGOTRY

Must Read

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

Follow us

A senior friend from college who is now staying in Australia narrated a story a couple of days back that evoked a fiery quest in me that refuses to die. She is a visibly Muslim woman who wears the headscarf. That day as she was commuting on Sydney trains after work, a middle-aged man sat behind her and started saying Jesus’ name aloud and she in her heart said, “Peace be upon him” (this is how Muslims address the Prophets) until his chanting became uncomfortable. As she ignored him and spoke to her father back home she realized that he was mimicking her. She hung up the call and ignored him which was followed by him hurling the choicest of abuses at her like, “You are a terrorist”, “Bloody Muslim”, etc. The rest, she said, she couldn’t reproduce.

As much as stories like this one reflect the sheer sense of “individualism” in the onlookers on whose watch people are harassed without them batting an eyelid, they also seem to spit right in the faces of those minorities that are “the other” to make them realize that they do not matter. If this was not bizarre enough, there are also people out there, well-exposed and fairly well-read included, that completely write off such incidents as “media creation,” “artificial hype”, etc. Their answer to the ongoing insanity is: log out and take a deep breath.  In this age of information which hit a new low in 2016, with Brexit and Donald Trump rising to power in the United States of America which was preceded by the rise of far-right in other nation-states such as India itself; that has also been termed by the Oxford Dictionary as “post-truth”, the clear lines of distinction between the oppressor and the oppressed, victim and the perpetrator, ruler and the subject, seem to have blurred. In this context, how does one understand the rise of right-wing parties across nations? Where exactly did those cracks lie in the previous parties’ rule that led the intellectually paralyzed ones to take over the reins of nation-states? Frustration arising out of the fear of losing one’s identity coupled with deep-seated anger; was a potent mix in this rather recurring pattern of right-wingers taking over. Religion, amidst all this, plays the role that it is least supposed to do: capitalizing on public fear.  Karamatullah K. Ghauri in his article “Fascism Knocking at America’s Door” published in a fortnightly The Milli Gazette in its issue of 1-15 December, 2016, writes: “Trump’s candidacy had started as nothing more than a joke. A reality television man who also happened to be a billionaire showman with a highly tainted reputation seemed to be looking for a good time on the political stage before bowing out with a hurrah. The news media laughed at, and ridiculed, him for yet another of his cheap publicity stunts… But looking back with the benefit of hindsight, the reality television buffoon wasn’t playing pranks but, in actual fact, playing on the sensitive chords of a racist America.” Speaking of the role of racism and religious bigotry, he writes: “But racism and religious bigotry may be surprise news only to those with little or no knowledge of the people, the so-called pioneers, who had initially settled the New World. Those who came from Europe in the 17th century to settle in the new land, claimed it in the name of God. The slogan was that it had been given to them to build a ‘New Jerusalem’ a ‘shining city on the hill’ that would be the beginning of a new era of Christian domination. So inspired by their dogmatic religious beliefs were those early settlers that they did not call themselves immigrants or settlers but “pilgrims.” Endowed with their God-given sanction, the ‘pilgrims’ slaughtered the native Americans, the so-called Red Indians, with a ferocity that could only be described as bestiality and utter savagery. Millions of the natives were decimated with impunity because the Christian clergy gave a blank cheque for that slaughter. The church justified the blood-letting in the name of purging the God-gifted land of the uncivilized ‘heathens.'” We see how religion is used as a tool to perpetuate atrocities and annihilate a class of humans that are seen as sub-humans by the fellow humans themselves. It is both interesting and shocking, in a single breath, to realize how the role of religion has been tampered with by people that rely solely on their base instincts. Samuel P. Huntington in his book “The Clash of Civilisations and the Remaking of the World Order” writes: “In the late 1980s the communist world collapsed, and the Cold War international system became history. In the post-Cold War world, the most important distinctions among peoples are not ideological, political, or economic. They are cultural. Peoples and nations are attempting to answer the most basic question humans can face: Who are we? And they are answering that question in the traditional way human beings have answered it, by reference to the things that mean most to them. People define themselves in terms of ancestry, religion, language, history, values, customs, and institutions. They identify with cultural groups: tribes, ethnic groups, religious communities, nations, and, at the broadest level, civilizations. People use politics not just to advance their interests but also to define their identity. We know who we are only when we know who we are not and often only when we know whom we are against.”

This sense of the ‘other’ and finding ways to justify the crudeness of this creed by putting up the façade of ‘protectionism’ is being perpetuated and instilled in our psyches for more chaos, more cries, more loss of life and limb and more money and political mileage. This is not the World we want. Not on our watch.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus. The petition sought to direct...

Gujarat High Court Directs To Register Name of Petitioners in the Society Records as Owners of Property, as per Will

A single-judge bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Justice Biren Vaishnav, because probate wasn’t necessary and that the petitioners were entitled to...

If No Complaint Is Filed, No Further Orders Are Required To Be Passed: Telangana High Court

Excerpt In Matlakunta Sundaramma vs The State Of Telangana, on January 8, 2021, the Telangana High Court decided that there is no requirement of passing...

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -