Story Of Jayaraj And Benicks: What is the Procedure for Investigating Custodial Deaths in India?

Must Read

The Right to Information and its Working of 15 years

On 12th October 2020, RTI finished fifteen years since its commencement. The question remains whether the legislation stands up to...

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

Follow us

The fury over the death of George Floyd, who died in police custody in the USA, has finally reached India. The custodial deaths of two men in Tamil Nadu have sparked great outrage. It has finally brought to light one of India’s biggest issues – custodial deaths.

Recent Incident in India

Police arrested Jayaraj and his son Benicks, on June 19. They arrested them for keeping their shop open for 15 min beyond the permitted hours. Later, the men died in the hospital. There were also alleged reports of brutal torture and sexual violence by the police. Not only this but they also allegedly tried to hide their wounds from the Magistrate.

The State Government has suspended the three accused police officers. They may very soon face murder charges. The outrage has forced the State government into action, who have transferred the case to the CBI. There are also reports of police trying to hide and side-track the investigation. The Madras HC has also received a report from the Magistrate. Based on this, they have initiated contempt proceedings against some police officers. These include the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Additional Deputy Superintendent of Police. The report also names a police constable for trying to derail the investigation.

Investigation Procedure of Custodial Deaths

The recent news begs one important question. What is the procedure for the investigation of custodial deaths? In cases of custodial death, evidence tampering is very common. So, CrPC gives the Magistrate powers to investigate into the incident immediately. Section 176(1) and 176(1A) of the CrPC provide for the procedure of investigation by the Magistrate. This procedure applies to any custodial death, torture, or rape. Section 176(5) states that the Magistrate must forward the body of the deceased to a Civil Surgeon. The Magistrate must do this within 24 hours of the inquiry.

Judicial Approach

The Supreme Court in the case of Lalita Kumari vs State of Uttar Pradesh did make it compulsory to lodge an FIR. The Court had stated that it is compulsory to lodge an FIR if there is evidence of a non-cognizable offense. Yet, despite this judgment, FIRs are barely filed in cases of custodial deaths.

Law Commission Report

The 152nd Law Commission Report studied the custodial crimes in detail in India. The report concluded that current laws were not enough. The report suggested that the legislature must incorporate a new section in the CrPC. Furthermore, it suggested that they must insert Section 154A. This section stated that any person or NGO must have the right to present a petition to the Session Judge in cases of custodial death. They can use this section when the police refuse to lodge an FIR. However, the legislature is yet to implement the recommended section.

Powers of Magistrate to Investigate

The CrPC confers adequate powers to the Magistrate to investigate. But compliance is dismal. A PIL filed in the Supreme Court in January 2020 throws more light on this. Only 20% of custodial deaths/rapes were met with action. Out of 827 cases of death, the Court ordered a judicial inquiry in only 166 cases. The Court passed notices to all States/UT’s to ensure the implementation of Section 176(1A). Yet, the order remains largely unfulfilled. Even in the recent case, the Madras High Court was forced to take suo moto cognizance. The High Court had to pass orders to the Judicial Magistrate to inquire into the case.

The National Human Rights Commission has also been proactive. The Commission has realized that the law needs ancillary help. It passed guidelines to help the proper investigation of custodial deaths. The guidelines have laid out several steps for the investigation. The Magistrate has to follow these steps during the investigation. The guidelines are more detailed than the Sections under the CrPC. These guidelines can definitely help in the investigation of custodial deaths. The NHRC has also required for cases of custodial deaths to be completed within 2 months.


Custodial crimes continue to plague India. With excess powers given to the police, it has become easy to get away after committing the crime. Despite the existence of laws to keep police power in check, the implementation of the law is lacking. What is needed is the major overhauling of the existing system. The law needs to hold the police accountable for their actions. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala gave...

UAPA Cannot Be Used When the Accused Does Not Have an Active Knowledge of the Offence: Delhi High Court

Justice Suresh Kumar Kait held that the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act cannot be charged on the accused when he does not have any knowledge...

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -