SEBI’s Advisory On Disclosure Of Impact of the Pandemic

Must Read

Ed-Tech Companies and the Consumer Protection Act

In the present time when the whole country is getting back to normal after the wrath of the Coronavirus,...

The Right to Information and its Working of 15 years

On 12th October 2020, RTI finished fifteen years since its commencement. The question remains whether the legislation stands up to...

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

Follow us


The Government of India announced the national lockdown on March 25, 2020. Businesses have come to a standstill due to which the economy has incurred unprecedented losses. In such difficult times, the role of Government, as well as sectoral regulators, is crucial in aiding the companies in surviving as well as recovering from its impact. 

Worldwide statutory securities authorities are attempting to assess the impact of COVID-19 outbreak on the markets and thus, requiring disclosures from the market players. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on April 8, 2020, made a public announcement asking public companies to ‘provide as much information as is practicable regarding their current financial and operating status, as well as their future operational and financial planning’. Similarly, the European Securities and Market Authority (“ESMA”) issued a recommendation on March 11, 2020, requiring the issuers to disclose as soon as possible any relevant significant information concerning the impacts of COVID-19 on their fundamentals, prospects, financial situation or a qualitative and quantitative assessment of business activities per their transparency obligations under the Market Abuse Regulation.

Securities Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) has taken a lenient approach concerning the compliances the listed companies have to adhere to during this period. During the lockdown period, SEBI has in total issued 37 circulars out of which 35 are about relaxations and extensions in timelines regarding compliances due to COVID 19.

SEBI Advisory on Disclosures

The advisory issued by SEBI on May 20, 2020, urged the listed entities to publish material information on the impact the COVID-19 pandemic has had on their business, performance, and financials along with the measures taken to curb the same. 

SEBI acknowledged that many companies have issued statements regarding the temporary closure of their operations, however, the financial disclosures have been less and prompted the companies to endeavor to make disclosures in a timely and adequate manner.

The regulator has given the following examples as to what may form material information 

  1. Impact of the CoVID-19 pandemic on the business; 
  2. Ability to  maintain  operations including  the  factories/units/office  spaces functioning and closed down;
  3. Schedule,  if any, for restarting  the operations; 
  4. Steps were taken to ensure smooth  functioning of operations; 
  5. Estimation  of the future impact of CoVID-19  on its operations;
  6. Details of the impact of CoVID-19 on listed entity’s-
  • capital and financial resources
  • profitability
  • liquidity position; 
  • ability to service debt and other financing arrangements
  • assets;
  • internal financial  reporting and control;
  • supply chain
  • demand for its products/services 

7. Existing  contracts/agreements where  non-fulfillment  of  the  obligations  by  any  party will have significant impact on the listed entity’s business;

8. Other relevant material updates about the listed entity’s business.

However this list is subject to the application of criteria of materiality criteria develop by the BOD and the information is to be provided as far as possible, thus vesting the final discretion to decide the extent of disclosure on the company’s management.

The circular does not provide a specific timeline for such disclosures but reasonably it can be understood to be done pursuant to a Board of Directors (“BOD”) meeting and updating it as and when material developments occur. 

Material Information

The Circular provides discretion to the companies to determine what form ‘material’ information. Under SEBI Listing Obligations and Disclosure Regulations, 2015 (“LODR”), Regulation 4 the listed entities are to timely disclose all accurate information on material matters including the financial situation,  performance, ownership, and governance.  

Regulation 30 of the LODR requires the entity to make such disclosures about material information in a periodical as well as event-based manner. The BOD of the listed entities are to develop a guideline for determining the materiality of an event or information on the basis that its omission is likely to result in its discontinuation or alteration of the event which is already publicly available, or where the late disclosure of such omission is likely to result into a major market reaction and other criteria determined by the BOD. 

The Schedule III Part A of LODR provides a list of events that are considered material and have to be mandatorily disclosed like any acquisition, the scheme of the arrangement, fraud defaults by KMPs, issuance/ forfeiture of securities, loan agreements taken not in the ordinary course of business, etc. Part B provides a list of events that shall be disclosed if such guidelines apply to them, one of such events is the disruption of operations of the listed entities. It is in pursuance of this provision that many companies issued statements about the closure of their business activities due to COVID 19 even before the SEBI advisory.

Disclosures regarding Future Actions

It is also pertinent to note that the advisory also provides for disclosures regarding future actions to be taken by the Companies, which are not covered in the LODR. Typically LODR requires disclosure limited to the facts thus the statements concerning the future obligations are not addressed under Indian Securities law. The SEC has also directed the companies to make forward-looking disclosures dealing with future operating conditions and strategies to be followed and directed companies to shift the focus on health and welfare strategy. Similarly, the ESMA has stated the forward-looking disclosures must be in adherence to the market regulations to prevent any form of market manipulation.

Such disclosures are quite relevant in making the investors aware and capable of assessing the entity’s current position and future approach. However, such information also has the potential to affect instruments’ market value, create a false market, and infringe other statutory provisions. General and vague statements without any details will also not serve the purpose of transparency, thus there is a need for a delicate balance to be maintained here.


In furtherance of the advisory several companies have issued statements. For instance, Tata stated that the impact of the outbreak has been severe in its non-food industries. The production is gradually restarting with the approvals being granted steadily. D-Mart stated that it was able to continue its operations due to its classification as essential services but its revenue reduced by 45% in April. Leela Hotels estimated zero revenue in the June quarter.

The intention behind it is to increase transparency and make the information available to the public domain not only for the benefit of the Government but also for investors, individuals, and institutions alike. Such disclosures will be imperative in drawing an analysis of the pandemic. It shall also facilitate the formulation of draft policies to form a way forward by the Government and other statutory bodies.

These measures have been preemptive and have paved a way to make corporate compliances and market awareness possible in the current scenario. Companies must refrain from making general or selective statements. Rather disclosures should be made in letter and spirit to ensure minimum risk to the investors and greater market transparency which in turn will aid in revival of the investments in the market.

This Article is written by: Ms. Anumeha Agrawal, Student, Vth year B.A.,L.L.B.(Hons.), Symbiosis Law School, Pune. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Germany had violated the...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Supreme Court Asks Petitioner to Approach Bombay High Court in PIL for CBI Probe in Disha Salian Case

On the 26th of October 2020, the Apex Court heard the PIL praying for a CBI probe into the death of Disha Salian. The...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -