Rising Police Brutality From USA To India, Analysing the ‘Exploitation of Power’

Must Read

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

“Pro-Enforcement Bias” Towards Foreign Arbitral Awards Domestically, in light of Vijay Karia and Ors. V. Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi S.R.L and Ors.

International Arbitration faces challenges domestically due to unharmonized local laws for enforcement. Often it may occur that an award...

Follow us

The powers conferred upon our police force are so vast. Hence, they have to take the utmost care in exercising their powers not to infringe the rights of others. Any misuse of power will shake the belief and faith of the people on the democratic setup.

However, the reality is entirely different. Police forces often misuse their powers by resorting to extra-judicial methods. When a person commits a serious crime, police sometimes do not consider them human. They think it is the only way to teach a lesson to the culprit and hence plan false encounters. One common justification is that the judicial system cannot deal with them effectively. This justification though is not convincing.

Police must deal with such activities within the legal framework. Anything beyond is in direct violation of the Right to Life under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Legal safeguard against custodial death

Section 330 of the IPC penalizes voluntarily causing hurt for extorting a confession. This offence carries a punishment of up to seven years in prison and fine. Section 331 of IPC states that if the harm inflicted is grievous, then the penalty can extend up to 10 years.

Section 29 of the Police Act 1861 also states penalties in cases of neglect of duty and punishment for the same. Still, charges are rarely brought against police officers for violating these provisions.

Section 176 of the CrPC mandates an enquiry by a Judicial Magistrate in some instances. These are death, enforced disappearance, or alleged rape in police custody. This inquiry is in addition to the police investigation.

The brutality of police has been growing even with these provisions in place.

Steps taken by the Supreme Court

In a landmark case of D.K. Basu v. West Bengal in 1997, the Supreme Court has set down certain rules to prevent such brutality. Sadly, the police violate it most of the time. The guidelines call for clear identification of the police when making the arrest. They also call for preparing a memo of the arrest. Further, every arrested person must be medically examined every 48 hours. The doctor must list any pre-existing injuries. Thus, any new injuries will point to police abuse in custody.  Even so, these protections have not prevented custodial abuses.

The 2015 Government data points to dysfunctional police procedures.  For 67 of 97 deaths in custody, the accused were not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours of arrest.

The ‘Black Lives Matter’ Protest Against Police Brutality in the US

On 25th May 2020, in Minneapolis, the police arrested a 46-year-old man named George Floyd. They arrested him for trying to pass a potentially counterfeit bill. While he had handcuffs on, a white police officer kneeled on Floyd’s neck for seven minutes. The police officer did not stop even after Floyd repeatedly said ‘I can’t breathe’. When the officer removed his knee, Floyd’s body was unresponsive. The doctors at the hospital pronounced him dead. However, the police statement did not mention about the brutality he faced.

Protests against the brutality of the police officers started on 26th May 2020. Racism is deep-rooted in our society. Sometimes we forget that even black people are humans. People came out on the streets in large numbers with ‘Black Lives Matter’ written on placards. Most of the people who protested were Whites. A poll for ABC suggested that 74% of Americans felt that the killing of Mr Floyd was part of a broader problem of racism.

Police are the custodians of law, and it should not matter to them if a person is black or white. These protests are a national push for the world to end the racism rooted in our society. These protests have led to the repealing of Section 50 A of the State Civil Rights Law.  This law was used as a shield to protect the officers’ disciplinary records from the public.

What about India?

According to the report ‘Prison Statistics India 2017’, the total number of deaths in prisons in 2017 was 1,671. Out of this, 1,494 were natural and 133 unnatural. The number of unnatural deaths in prisons has increased by 15.7 per cent from 115 in 2015 to 133 in 2017.

There are many cases where police have tortured people in custody. There have been cases of rape and even deaths. An incident that took place in Bangalore in 2004 is another example. Here, officers harassed a transgender person in the police station. During this difficult time, the police brutality has come to fore.

Recently, Sonu Shah, an essential service provider, was shot on 26th March. Local police officers fired at his foot because he did not agree to bribe them. Shah’s incident is not the only instance of police brutality.

Further, many police officers have been assaulting migrants trying to reach their homes.

Concluding Remarks

The custodian of law acting as its biggest perpetrators is a heinous crime. Officers must abide by the laws and enforce them. They must not violate the fundamental rights of human dignity and freedom of individuals. Police brutality constitutes a violation of fundamental human rights. In many of the cases detailed in the report by Human Rights Watch, deaths in custody could have been prevented if police had followed the rules laid down. If an officer mistreats suspects, the officer should be punished, and an end should be put to this crime.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

Uttarakhand High Court Directed State Authorities To Frame SOP Regarding Kumbh Mela 2021

Noticing the commencement date of Kumbh Mela 2021 amid pandemic from 27 February 2021, the Uttarakhand High Court on Monday expressed concern with regard to organizing and conducting of the Mela and directed State Authorities to discuss and resolve the logistical problems which can come in organizing the Mela during the pandemic time.

Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Mahindra Finance, Being a Purely Private Body: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court reiterated that Writ Petition against the purely private body is not maintainable and dismissed the petition which was filed against Mahindra Finance Bank as Arif Khan v. Branch Manager Mahindra Finance Sultanpur & Another.

Publication of Notices for Inter-Faith Marriages No Longer Mandatory: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has passed a landmark judgment that likely brings relief to inter-faith marriage. The Court on Wednesday said that the mandatory publication of Notices of Inter-Faith marriages will now be optional to protect the Privacy and Liberty of the Couple. The Court observed that the publication of the notice would “invade the fundamental rights of liberty and privacy”. Therefore, it has made it optional for the couple, they can now request in form of writing to a marriage officer to publish or not to publish a notice regarding the marriage.

Bombay High Court to NIA: Consider Health and Age of Varavara Rao Before Opposing His Bail Plea

The Bombay HC on Wednesday observed that ‘we are all humans’ and asked the National Investigation Agency and the Maharashtra Government to consider the health and age of the Telugu poet-activist Varavara Rao before making submissions in response to his bail plea application on medical grounds.

Supreme Court Agrees To Examine Centre’s Plea To Keep Adultery a Crime in Armed Forces

The Centre appealed to the Supreme court on Wednesday, pleading that the 2018 judgment of decriminalizing adultery under IPC must not apply to the armed forces. The Supreme Court in a path-breaking verdict in 2018 decriminalized adultery and declared all its provisions unconstitutional as it diminishes the value of women, but maintained that it continues to be a ground for divorce.

Supreme Court Examines the Pollution in Yamuna River for the Second Time

The Supreme Court on Wednesday made a second attempt to clean the Yamuna river by taking a Suo Moto Cognizance of significantly high levels of ammonia water discharged from neighbouring states like Haryana into Delhi.

Fetus Suffering From Anencephaly, Woman’s Plea To Terminate 28-Weeks Pregnancy Allowed by Delhi HC

Based on the report of the medical board constituted by AIIMS, the Delhi High Court on Monday allowed a petition filed by a woman seeking the termination of her 28-weeks pregnancy. They said in its report that the fetus suffered from anencephaly, a disorder where the skull bone is not developed and was thus incompatible with life, therefore her fetus can be aborted.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -