Religion as our Strength

Must Read

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

Follow us

Religious Sensitivities

The undivided India had undergone a long enduring battle against the tyrannical rule of the British to attain complete freedom. Different people from different beliefs marched under the same flag of freedom. The British imperialist made every possibility of drawing the line and exploit the religious diversity, but the freedom movement did not tremble against the evil doers. Unfortunately, the freedom from the shackles of the century old rule gained on the lines of Partition. The British managed to demarcate the country on religious ideologies resulting into a bloodbath and massive migration.

Even after the gruesome bloodshed, India retained its diversity. The Framers of the Constitution cherished the principles of secularity by enacting the provisions ensuring freedom and protection of every religious belief. The visionary text, called the Constitution of India, freed the people from oppression and exploitation on religious lines. But, the dawn of a reformed and progressive democracy, bear the brunt of religious oppression. The Casteism amongst the Hindus, Unequal rights of the Muslim Women, the rift between Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs and Christians, Violent forms of discrimination against the Minority, etc had acted as a stigma to this progressive society. There are practices abolished and condemned, but there prevalence is still rampant. Taking the note of the current scenario, religious sensitivities in the form of attacks on Churches, forced conversion, honour killings, etc. The Framers of the Constitution envisioned that the right to profess, propagate and practice any religious belief to be a Fundamental Right, but they also limited its reach under “reasonable restrictions”. The Hon’ Supreme Court of India, acted as a true Guardian of the Constitution, by safeguarding the Fundamental Rights of the citizens. But, we in a progressive society, must have a broader thinking to value, safeguard and cherish every religious identity of our own peers.

Political Impediment against Religious Reforms

The democratic institution formed in 1950 with the promulgation of the Indian Constitution led to the rise of a vibrant pluralistic society. But, unfortunately, the dreams of the freedom fighters were not entirely fulfilled. Ideally, the independence struggle was led to establish a free society with different sects of people living harmoniously. This vision hampered due to frequent political disturbances. The Britishers cannot be blamed in entirety, it was the fight of the power-hungry politicians that led to the biggest nightmare of Partition. The Partition not only led to the loss of large scale lives, but also led to heavy economic losses. It jeopardised our growth as a progressive nation, as the scars of partition are still alive in many hearts pulling us back to those times. Not only, the episode of 1947, there are many other instances where the lackadaisical attitude of the legislators marred religious reforms. Such was the incident after the Hon’ Supreme Court of India, allowed maintenance to a Muslim woman under the purview of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The following observation was made in the Shah Bano judgment, which many public-spirited individuals viewed as a reformative judgment freeing the Muslim women from the exploitation. But, in the contemporary India, where religious practices, even if orthodox and exploitative are cherished over individual freedom and liberty. The country witnessed mass agitation from the Muslim orthodox sects, claiming it to be an impeachment in their religious affairs. The, then Government, despite of upholding the visionary judgment, followed the appeasement policy that completely destroyed the observation, and the following judgment of Daniel Latifi overruled the Shah Bano Judgment. This political move to retain the vote did not only pulled back the women back into the shackles and state of oppression, but also caused religious enmity. The demolition of Babri Masjid not only fuelled the fire, but also led to the nationwide riots leading to many deaths. The issue of Ramjanmabhoomi is pending before the Hon’ Court, but it is upon us as future leaders by comprehending upon the issue and evaluate the necessity of a Mandir or Masjid or rather something more valuable to the needy people with the common amicable efforts of both the communities. Whether the issue of maintenance or Ramnjanmabhoomi or many other current issues, the collective effort is required to amicably resolve these obstacles which will only fulfil the vision of our forefathers, but will also lead us to a more fairer, free and reformed society.

A New Dawn of the 21st Century

India and Pakistan started the race to establish their own identities from the same starting point. Nations are made of its people. Both the nation before independence together fought the arbitrary and tyrannical regime. The goals were common i.e. to attain complete freedom from slavery be their own masters. But, Pakistan lost its tracks due to orthodoxy and outmoded customs. The blasphemy laws rigidly followed has made the state intolerant to free speech and often religious extremism has taken a violent turn. Minorities communities of Pakistan such as Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Ahmadis have suffered irreparable losses both of life and property. India too is no indifferent from its neighbour. Religious intolerance have often reported in the country, but fortunately with the true guidance of eloquent policy makers and public spirited individuals, India has somehow managed to abolish the customs considered to be arbitrary in practice.

This above comparison can be further highlighted with the help of two case studies. Firstly, the issue of coparcenary was duly addressed. Before the year 2005, the women were not considered to be coparcenaries which entitle them of intestate property. But, this provision of the respective statute was duly revised, and after careful deliberations an Amendment was brought into effect entitling them over intestate property as coparceners. The Amendment not only empowered the Hindu women of self-dependency, but equally entitled them the right to say in the family, moreover the right to existence often taken away under patriarchy mindset of the society. Secondly, by the Hon’ Court taking a bold step as taken in the Shah Bano Case to grant entry to the women in the Haji Ali Dargah. This decision extended equal rights to preach to the women. The judgment was widely applauded, but also attracted condemnation from the orthodox sections of the society. The Hon’ Supreme Court of India has laid the test for “Essential Religious Practice” to determine whether the practice of the religious sect is protected under Article 26 of the Constitution of India. The ERP is although not defined under the Constitution, but have been interpreted on several occasions by the Apex Court. The decision in the Haji Ali case or the reformative amendments, both indicates that India still embolden upon the principles of equality and secularity.

Conclusion

Swami Vivekananda called the world as one big family, so we as Indians must also consider ourselves as one family. The family that lives together collectively cherish the ideals, and resolves the disputes. Therefore, we as Indians not only aim to protect our interest, but also selflessly protect the interest of the citizens belonging to different sects. A collective voice must be raised against any discriminatory practice or policy. We must endeavour to bring a change to the society. Every individual must strive develop a far-sighted goal of leading India to a greater path. Our religious diversity must be indicated not as our weaknesses which can be exploited by anyone, but as our strength that brings us together against all odds. And to uphold this, any lapses must be avoided to correct the ills prevalent in any belief.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -