Overview of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019

Must Read

Explained: The Right to be Forgotten in India

Right to Privacy is an essential fundamental right which has been enshrined in the Indian Constitution under Article 21...

How will the New WhatsApp Privacy Policy Affect Us?

On January 4, 2020, the California based tech giant WhatsApp announced its new privacy law. It allows data integration...

India’s International ‘Retrospective Taxation’ Regime Vis-a-Vis PCA Rulings in Vodafone and Cairn in 2020

The imposition of retrospective taxation of foreign companies doing business in India has been at the helm of controversy...

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

Follow us

The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 finally replaced the 3-decade-old Consumer Protection Act, 1986. It received the assent of the President of India and was published in the official gazette on 9th August 2019. It came into force recently on 20th July 2020. The analysis of the 2019 act is important for two reasons. First, it introduces various new terms and provisions, including the much-needed definition of e-commerce. Second, it brings significant amendments to the key sections of the 1986 Act, thereby widening its scope. This piece of work aims to highlight the new as well as the amended aspects of this act and draw a comparison with the old act in these aspects.

Need for the 2019 Act 

There was a need for this act to be enacted in order to provide timely and effective administration and settlement of consumer disputes. With the advancement of technology and the growing predominance of e-commerce, there was a need felt to revamp the law and sink it with the societal changes.  This replacement is done primarily to meet the increasing needs of the modern-day consumer. It extends the basic rights of a consumer to e-commerce consumers. There are six basic rights of a consumer in India– Right to Safety, Right to Choose, Right to seek Redressal, Right to be Informed, Right to consumer education, Right to be heard. This act thus aims to protect these rights by introducing new procedures and terms. 

1986 Act v/s 2019 Act

S.No.BasisConsumer Protection Act, 1986Consumer Protection Act, 2019
1ScopeAll goods & services for consideration, while free and personal services were excludedAll goods & services, including telecom and housing construction and all modes of transactions (online, etc.) for consideration, while free and personal services are excluded. 
2Product LiabilityNo ProvisionClaim for product liability can be made against a manufacturer, service provider, and seller. Compensation can be obtained by proving one of the several specified conditions in the Act.
3Pecuniary jurisdiction of CommissionsDistrict: Up to Rs 20 lakh; 

State: Between Rs 20 lakh and up to Rs one crore;

 National:  Above Rs one crore.

District: Up to Rs one crore;

 State: Between Rs one crore and up to Rs 10 crore; 

National:  above Rs 10 crore.

4Unfair contractsNo ProvisionContracts that cause a significant change in consumer rights. Lists six contract terms which may be held as unfair.
5Central Protection Councils (CPCs)CPCs promote and protect the rights of consumers. They are established at the district, state, and national level.The new Act makes CPCs advisory bodies for promotion and protection of consumer rights. Establishes CPCs at the District, State and National Level.
6E-commerceNo ProvisionDefines direct selling, e-commerce and electronic service provider. The central government may prescribe rules for preventing unfair trade practices in e-commerce and direct selling.
7RegulatorNo ProvisionEstablishes the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) to promote, protect, and enforce the rights of consumers as a class.   CCPA may: issue safety notices;  pass orders to recall goods, prevent unfair practices, and reimburse purchase price paid; and impose penalties for false and misleading advertisements.
8Composition of CommissionsDistrict: Headed by current or former District Judge and two members. State:  Headed by a current or former High Court Judge and at least two members. National:  Headed by a current or former Supreme Court Judge and at least four members.District:  Headed by a president and at least two members. State:  Headed by a president and at least four members. National:  Headed by a president and at least four members
9Alternate dispute redressal mechanismNo ProvisionMediation cells will be attached to the District, State, and National Commissions
10PenaltiesIf a person does not comply with orders of the Commissions, he may face imprisonment between one month and three years or fine between Rs 2,000 to Rs 10,000 or both.If a person does not comply with orders of the Commissions, he may face imprisonment up to three years, or a fine not less than Rs 25,000 extendable to Rs one lakh, or both. (in case he does not suffer any injury.)
11AppointmentSelection Committee (comprising a judicial member and other officials) will recommend members on the Commissions.No provision for Selection Committee.  Central Government will appoint through notification.
12AppealsEarlier 30 days period for appeal against the order of District forum Now, it is for 45 days.

 

Offences and penalties under the 2019 Act

For non-compliance of orders 

    • Imprisonment from 1 month to 3 years; Fine from Rs. 25,000/- to Rs. 1,00,000 /- or both.

For products containing adulterants 

      1. If it does not result in injury– Imprisonment: Up to 6 months Fine: Up to Rs 1,00,000/-
      2. Injury not amounting to grievous hurt-  Imprisonment: Up to 1 year Fine: Up to Rs. 3,00,000/-
      3. Injury resulting in grievous hurt-  Imprisonment: Up to 7 years Fine: Up to Rs. 5,00,000/-
      4. For causing the death of consumer-  Imprisonment: Up to 7 years extended Up to life imprisonment   Fine: Up to Rs. 10,00,000/-

For Spurious Goods

    1. Injury not amounting to grievous hurt-  Imprisonment: Up to 1 year Fine: Up to Rs. 3,00,000/-
    2. Injury resulting in grievous hurt-  Imprisonment: Up to 7 years Fine: Up to Rs. 5,00,000/-
    3. For causing the death of consumer–  Imprisonment: Up to 7 years extended Up to life imprisonment   Fine: Up to Rs. 10,00,000/-

Conclusion 

All-in-all the 2019 Act is a positive step towards reformation and development of consumer laws, in the light of dynamically changing socio-economic developments. We can say that the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is one of the sincerest steps taken by the central government for enhancing consumer rights and speedy delivering of justice. The new Act encompasses multiple aspects such as Mediation and E-commerce, which the world was unaware in 1986. It is crucial to amend the act when digitalization has changed the way a consumer conducts transactions online, especially when the mode of purchase has shifted from offline to online. Certainly 2019 Act is a positive step towards reformation, development and enhancing consumer rights, but the real test for the 2019 Act is in its implementation, and some leeway needs to be given for it to actualize the relief for the consumers.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Judgment which said Groping without Skin Contact Not Sexual Assault under POCSO

The National Commission for Women (NCW) has challenged the Bombay High Court judgment where it stated that groping a child’s breasts without any ‘skin-to-skin’ contact will not be considered as sexual assault as defined under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Supreme Court Classifying Employees Based on Educational Qualifications for Promotion or Appointment Is Neither Violative of Article 14 nor of Article 16

This case concerns the dispute relating to the classification of employees belonging to the homogenous group based on educational qualifications. Brief facts of the case The...

Supreme Court Refuses To Transfer Petitions To Itself Related To ‘Love Jihad’ Filed in Allahabad High Court

On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to entertain the plea which was filed by the UP Government regarding the transfer of all the pleas challenging the ordinance the court passed, from Allahabad High Court to the Supreme Court.

Bombay HC Nagpur Bench Holds That Groping a Girl Without ‘Skin To Skin’ Contact Is Not Sexual Assault

The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court acquitted a man charged under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and convicted him of a minor offence under IPC stating that there was no direct physical contact.

Delhi High Court Restrains Publication of Book on “the Ryan School Murder”

The Order had come in an injunction application filed by the St. Xavier's Education Trust in Delhi. The Plaintiff sought ad-interim restraining order on...

Supreme Court Closed Proceeding in Case of “in Re: Advocate on Record Includes a Proprietary Firm Etc.”

Brief facts of the case Emails from the Petitioner resulted in an administrative decision. An Order of the Supreme Court has drawn up the issue...

Supreme Court To Hear Female Army Officers Plea on Non-Implementation of the Permanent Commission

Claiming that its order granting Permanent Commission to women in the army’s non-combat support units on par with the male counterparts was not implemented well, many Women Army officers have approached the Supreme Court.

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -