Overview of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019

Must Read

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

The Debate Between IPR and Competition Law Explained

There are various market processes or structures that govern market scenario. For simplicity, this paper focuses on two mechanisms:...

Follow us

The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 finally replaced the 3-decade-old Consumer Protection Act, 1986. It received the assent of the President of India and was published in the official gazette on 9th August 2019. It came into force recently on 20th July 2020. The analysis of the 2019 act is important for two reasons. First, it introduces various new terms and provisions, including the much-needed definition of e-commerce. Second, it brings significant amendments to the key sections of the 1986 Act, thereby widening its scope. This piece of work aims to highlight the new as well as the amended aspects of this act and draw a comparison with the old act in these aspects.

Need for the 2019 Act 

There was a need for this act to be enacted in order to provide timely and effective administration and settlement of consumer disputes. With the advancement of technology and the growing predominance of e-commerce, there was a need felt to revamp the law and sink it with the societal changes.  This replacement is done primarily to meet the increasing needs of the modern-day consumer. It extends the basic rights of a consumer to e-commerce consumers. There are six basic rights of a consumer in India– Right to Safety, Right to Choose, Right to seek Redressal, Right to be Informed, Right to consumer education, Right to be heard. This act thus aims to protect these rights by introducing new procedures and terms. 

1986 Act v/s 2019 Act

S.No.BasisConsumer Protection Act, 1986Consumer Protection Act, 2019
1ScopeAll goods & services for consideration, while free and personal services were excludedAll goods & services, including telecom and housing construction and all modes of transactions (online, etc.) for consideration, while free and personal services are excluded. 
2Product LiabilityNo ProvisionClaim for product liability can be made against a manufacturer, service provider, and seller. Compensation can be obtained by proving one of the several specified conditions in the Act.
3Pecuniary jurisdiction of CommissionsDistrict: Up to Rs 20 lakh; 

State: Between Rs 20 lakh and up to Rs one crore;

 National:  Above Rs one crore.

District: Up to Rs one crore;

 State: Between Rs one crore and up to Rs 10 crore; 

National:  above Rs 10 crore.

4Unfair contractsNo ProvisionContracts that cause a significant change in consumer rights. Lists six contract terms which may be held as unfair.
5Central Protection Councils (CPCs)CPCs promote and protect the rights of consumers. They are established at the district, state, and national level.The new Act makes CPCs advisory bodies for promotion and protection of consumer rights. Establishes CPCs at the District, State and National Level.
6E-commerceNo ProvisionDefines direct selling, e-commerce and electronic service provider. The central government may prescribe rules for preventing unfair trade practices in e-commerce and direct selling.
7RegulatorNo ProvisionEstablishes the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) to promote, protect, and enforce the rights of consumers as a class.   CCPA may: issue safety notices;  pass orders to recall goods, prevent unfair practices, and reimburse purchase price paid; and impose penalties for false and misleading advertisements.
8Composition of CommissionsDistrict: Headed by current or former District Judge and two members. State:  Headed by a current or former High Court Judge and at least two members. National:  Headed by a current or former Supreme Court Judge and at least four members.District:  Headed by a president and at least two members. State:  Headed by a president and at least four members. National:  Headed by a president and at least four members
9Alternate dispute redressal mechanismNo ProvisionMediation cells will be attached to the District, State, and National Commissions
10PenaltiesIf a person does not comply with orders of the Commissions, he may face imprisonment between one month and three years or fine between Rs 2,000 to Rs 10,000 or both.If a person does not comply with orders of the Commissions, he may face imprisonment up to three years, or a fine not less than Rs 25,000 extendable to Rs one lakh, or both. (in case he does not suffer any injury.)
11AppointmentSelection Committee (comprising a judicial member and other officials) will recommend members on the Commissions.No provision for Selection Committee.  Central Government will appoint through notification.
12AppealsEarlier 30 days period for appeal against the order of District forum Now, it is for 45 days.

 

Offences and penalties under the 2019 Act

For non-compliance of orders 

    • Imprisonment from 1 month to 3 years; Fine from Rs. 25,000/- to Rs. 1,00,000 /- or both.

For products containing adulterants 

      1. If it does not result in injury– Imprisonment: Up to 6 months Fine: Up to Rs 1,00,000/-
      2. Injury not amounting to grievous hurt-  Imprisonment: Up to 1 year Fine: Up to Rs. 3,00,000/-
      3. Injury resulting in grievous hurt-  Imprisonment: Up to 7 years Fine: Up to Rs. 5,00,000/-
      4. For causing the death of consumer-  Imprisonment: Up to 7 years extended Up to life imprisonment   Fine: Up to Rs. 10,00,000/-

For Spurious Goods

    1. Injury not amounting to grievous hurt-  Imprisonment: Up to 1 year Fine: Up to Rs. 3,00,000/-
    2. Injury resulting in grievous hurt-  Imprisonment: Up to 7 years Fine: Up to Rs. 5,00,000/-
    3. For causing the death of consumer–  Imprisonment: Up to 7 years extended Up to life imprisonment   Fine: Up to Rs. 10,00,000/-

Conclusion 

All-in-all the 2019 Act is a positive step towards reformation and development of consumer laws, in the light of dynamically changing socio-economic developments. We can say that the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is one of the sincerest steps taken by the central government for enhancing consumer rights and speedy delivering of justice. The new Act encompasses multiple aspects such as Mediation and E-commerce, which the world was unaware in 1986. It is crucial to amend the act when digitalization has changed the way a consumer conducts transactions online, especially when the mode of purchase has shifted from offline to online. Certainly 2019 Act is a positive step towards reformation, development and enhancing consumer rights, but the real test for the 2019 Act is in its implementation, and some leeway needs to be given for it to actualize the relief for the consumers.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -