Analyzing the Suspension of Labour Laws In Light of COVID-19

Must Read

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

The Debate Between IPR and Competition Law Explained

There are various market processes or structures that govern market scenario. For simplicity, this paper focuses on two mechanisms:...

Follow us

Some states in India have made drastic amendments to the application of labour laws. Though, they claim it to be for a limited time –period. This is in response, to the current pandemic which has affected the whole economy. It has created an uncertain future for the companies and the labourers. The state governments claim that the amendment will incentivize the country. But this move has garnered extreme reviews from the public. While some support the action in light of the current pandemic. Others have criticized it and have moved to the President for intervention. Before delving into the issue, let’s have a clear picture of the labour laws in the country.

How did Labour Legislations Develop in India 

Industrialisation in India, as in other countries, brought some new socio-economic issues. The traditional concept of master-servant relationships changed. The gap between the rich and the poor grew into two classes of ‘Haves’ and ‘Have-nots’. The Have-nots class are often subject to exploitation. The workmen realised that they could put a better fight if they get united. This feeling led to the emergence of strikes and lock-outs. The world saw two wars before workers got recognition for their rights. Which increased the cost of living and as a result, the labour started demanding an increase in wages.

Post-independence a new branch known as Industrial Jurisprudence developed in our country. Earlier the government only focused on amelioration of the conditions of labour. They did not deal provide social justice to the working class. Post the enactment of the Constitution, the emphasis was on ensuring self-resilience. This led to a new approach for the development of a labour policy known as ‘Tripart-ism’.

What are The Labour Laws in India 

There are over 250 labour legislations in India. These stand between the centre and the state, as labour falls under the Concurrent List. Different laws are dealing with different issues.

For example- 

  • The laws dealing with wages and payment are- 

The Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Payment of Wages Act, 1936, etc.

  • The laws dealing with conditions of work are-

Factories Act, 1948; The Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970, etc.

  • The laws dealing with social security are-

Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948; Employees’ Provident Fund Act, 1952.

The Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 is the most contentious legislation. It deals with terms like layoff, retrenchment, strikes, lock-out, etc.

There are many legislations on this issue. But the term ‘labour law’ is not defined anywhere. The economy is advancing. The relation between the employer and the workmen is evolving. Hence, new disputes will continue to arise. This will lead to the enactment of new laws. The current labour laws in India are often criticized for being inflexible and outdated. Moreover, having so many legislations are difficult to understand, follow, and install.

What have the States Proposed

While most states including Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Punjab have introduced significant changes. The BJP led government in Uttar Pradesh introduced the most extreme amendments. Trade Unions are criticizing this move and terming it as regressive. These states have granted a complete exemption to employers from the labour laws. The pertinent changes introduced by some states are as follows-

Uttar Pradesh

The government has suspended most labour law provisions for three years. The Ordinance has exempted three laws. These relate to the issue of bonded labour and deployment of women & children. It also exempts laws relating to the timely payment of salary from its purview. 

Madhya Pradesh

The government has extended the daily working hours to 12 hours per day. It has moulded certain laws in favour of the employers by granting them exemptions. Such laws include- MP Industrial Relations Act and Industrial Disputes Act. The Factories Act exempts new factories from the Labour Department. They have permission to conduct third party inspections at their will. 

Punjab, Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh

The governments have extended working hours in manufacturing units. The new limit is 12 hours from 8 hours per day or 72 hours per week. But the Punjab government has promised higher overtime wages for the extra hours of work. 

Leaders of seven political parties have written letters to the President. These letters request the President to look into the issue. They raised concerns about the livelihood, welfare, and future of the workmen. The letter terms the move as unconstitutional. It alleges that the suspension violates several rights of the workmen. This includes the right to organize themselves in a union. It is far from granting the fundamental right to life and dignity. 

Author’s Note

Since labour is a subject of the Concurrent list, both the Centre and the State have the power to legislate on it. This amendment violates the International Labour Organisation Convention, which India ratified years ago. Under the convention, the working hours continue to be 48 hours per week. This violation is censurable. Especially due to the history of India and the battle against exploitation. Moreover, it seems as if the government has turned from its statement. In the initial phase of the lockdown, the government appealed to the firms. It asked them to not fire the workers or deduct their salaries. Now it is doing even worse by stripping them off their power and protection. 

There is a need for a balanced reform to take place. Along with granting exemptions to the employers. The government should allow for a flexible hire and fire method. The governments should propose a scheme for compensating the unemployed during the lockdown. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -