Madhya Pradesh’s New Rape Law: A Knee-Jerk Legislation Against A Setting Sun

Must Read

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

Follow us


The Madhya Pradesh Assembly in December 2017 unanimously passed a bill which pertains to awarding death to those found guilty of the offense of rape against the girls aged twelve and below. With this, Madhya Pradesh becomes the solo state in the country where such rape offenses will face the gallows. The Bill was passed without any hitches since the opposition too was in harmony with the Chief Minster’s view that, “Jo log 12 saal ki masoom bachhi ka balatkaar karte hain wo manushya nahi pishach hain unhe jeene ka adhikaar nahi” {The individuals who commit rape on 12-year-old girls are not humans but devils. They don’t have the right to live any more}. Capital punishment will be awarded to convicts under section 376 (A), which relates to rape, and section 376 (D, A), pertaining to gang rape.

Jo log 12 saal ki masoom bachhi ka balatkaar karte hain wo manushya nahi pishach hain unhe jeene ka adhikaar nahi

The State of Madhya Pradesh has consistently been a worse performer in ensuring women’s safety. The National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) data for 2015 indicates Madhya Pradesh as the reporter of the highest number of rape cases (4,391) in the country.  Similarly, as per NCRB 2014 data, Madhya Pradesh reported 5,076 cases, accounting for/comprising of 14 per cent of the total rape incidents in India.

However, this move of the Government is entrenched in its attempt to look tough on offenses against women in the light of recent events. In October 2017, the police stonewalled the filing of FIR of a 19-year old student who was allegedly raped near the railway station under broad day-light in Bhopal. The incident attracted the wrath of the entire nation placing/glorifying the inefficiency of police offices in lime-light and unnecessary delays by police in cognizable offenses.

The Legislation might help Government save its face; but, it fails to provide a solution to the issue at hand. The delay in filing FIR, the treatment meted out to rape victims in the police station and the paternalistic attitude of police officers, all are at the core of the problem here. These issues seem to preclude all. The entire discourse is directed towards the punishment deserved by the rapist and not towards having access to justice in the first place. Punishment can be awarded only after the case has been registered at the police station, then brought to trial and decided upon by the Judiciary. However, if the first condition of this chain i.e. the police officers fails to performs of their duties, then any change to the quantum of punishment will bring a very little change to the ground reality for women.

Scope of the Legislation: A Potentially Counter Productive Move

This Legislation will also apply to cases wherein the rape victim is below 12-years of age. Statistically, children between the age of 5-12 possess the highest risk of physical sexual abuse. Majority of these offenses are committed by family members who are in a position of trust or authority. Coming forward to report cases against their own family members in India where social structure is characterized by close-knit families, is difficult. The attempts are made to silence the voices owing to the taboo around rape and sexual abuse. This punishment will further preclude individuals to come forward with complaints as the/in case the offender is a close family kin. Also, the enhancement in the quantum of punishment is of no avail in getting rid of the taboo, which is all pervasive in Indian society.

Facets of Capital Punishment: Humanitarian Concerns

One of the main functions of modern-day punishment is reformation and deterrence. The former aims at changing the character of the convict and the latter works towards setting an example in the society and deterring any individual from committing the same crime. However, in case of a death penalty, there is no opportunity given to the convict to lead a changed/reformed life after completion of his/her punishment. The Law Commission report released in 2015 has busted the myth that Death penalty acts as a deterrent.

One understands law, justice and accordingly individual/societal responsibility dictates their view on capital punishment. The society at large cannot get any by labeling the rapists as either ‘evil’ or ‘pishach’ because as per a rational argument, they too are a part of society we all reside in. The process of socialization has an impact on the actions of the individual. This is not to say that there exists no individual responsibility for one’s own actions, but to make a point that criminal activities are as much as societal responsibility as individual responsibility. Even the Supreme Court acknowledged that being on death row in India amounts to “near torture” for the convict. The ends of reducing crimes cannot justify the means.

The Dissent

Human Rights lawyers, activists, and various NGOs have voiced their concern and discontentment towards the Bill. One Asmita Basu, programs director, Amnesty International India, in a statement said, “the government should, instead, focus on ensuring the certainty of justice rather than increasing the severity of punishment. The Justice Verma Committee and India’s Law Commission have both opposed the use of the death penalty for crimes involving sexual violence.” The death penalty is the ultimate violation of the right to life.”

The decision of Madhya Pradesh to regard Death Penalty as a viable and an apt solution in an era where the International Community is deliberating on doing away with this inhumane act altogether has surprised them.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Supreme Court Directs Government To Provide Free Education To Minor Children of Rape Victims

The Deputy Commissioner of Ranchi was directed by the Supreme Court on Wednesday to make sure that minor children of rape victims are ensured free education till they attain the age of 14 years. The Court made the observation while hearing a plea filed by a woman who claimed that she belonged to the SC/ST group from Jharkhand. She was forced by a man after which her father lodged a complaint.

Aadhar Review Plea Rejected in a 4:1 Verdict by Supreme Court

The petition seeking the re-examination of the 2018 Aadhar Verdict which declares the Aadhar act constitutional and valid was dismissed by a 5-judge bench in a 4:1 verdict. In January the petitions were considered by a bench of Justices A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud, S Abdul Nazeer, Ashok Bhushan, and B R Gavai in the chamber and the order was up on the website on Wednesday.

New Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendments Are Valid Says Supreme Court

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments in the insolvency and bankruptcy code which makes it mandatory for a minimum of 100 or 10% of home buyers of a project to initiate insolvency proceedings against a builder for not delivering flats or commercial shops on time.

[HUL – Sebamed Ad War] Bombay High Court Passed Injunction; Permits Sebamed Ad Against HUL’s Dove

The ad war between the German personal care brand Sebamed and the consumer goods giant Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL) has come to an end. On January 19th, Bombay High Court passed an injunction order permitting the Sebamed ad against Hindustan Unilever’s Dove without any changes. It was observed that Sebamed ads were backed with evidence-based data. However, Sebamed was ordered to put an end to its advertisement that compared HUL soap bars Lux, Pears, and Santoor with Rin and detergent category.

Bombay High Court Says White Collar Crimes Are More Dangerous Than Murder and Dacoity

The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court rejected 4 petitions of 4 businessmen after observing that white-collar crimes are more serious than murder and dacoity. The businesspersons were booked for fraud of evading GST by producing fake invoices.

Right To Protection Can’t Be Granted To Married Woman Involved in Live-in Relationship: Allahabad High Court

The Bench of Allahabad High Court dismissed a petition of a live-in couple, observing that a married woman in a live-in relationship is not entitled to any sort of legal protection whatsoever. The Court remarked that they are adults and should live as ‘husband and wife’ if they want no one to interfere in their lives.

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

[Sushant Singh Rajput Case]: Republic TV & Times Now Hindered Investigation Probe Says Bombay HC

In November last year, the Court had reserved its judgement on the PILs that came from 8 former police officers from Maharashtra, lawyers, activists and NGOs, seeking restraining orders against the media trial in the Sushant Singh Rajput case.

Women Advocates Move To Supreme Court Against the Delhi HC Orders on Resuming Physical Hearing

Another writ petition has been filed by women advocates in the Supreme Court against the decision of the Delhi HC of directing the expansion of physical hearing of cases within the National Capital Territory of Delhi without giving an option to litigants to be represented by their lawyers virtually.

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -