Lok Sabha Passes Bill To Raise Salaries Of High Court And Supreme Court Judges

Must Read

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

“Pro-Enforcement Bias” Towards Foreign Arbitral Awards Domestically, in light of Vijay Karia and Ors. V. Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi S.R.L and Ors.

International Arbitration faces challenges domestically due to unharmonized local laws for enforcement. Often it may occur that an award...

Follow us

The High Court And Supreme Court Judges (Salaries And Conditions Of Service) Amendment Bill, 2017

On 4th January 2018, the Lok Sabha passed a Bill (The High Court and Supreme Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Amendment Bill, 2017) introducing a hike in salaries of the High Court and the Supreme Court judges. The Bill is now pending in Rajya Sabha. Once the bill becomes a law, the Chief Justice of India will get a salary of Rupees 2.80 lakhs instead of the prevailing one lakh. The judges of the High Court will get Rupees 2.25 lakhs per month instead of the prevailing 80,000. The salary hike is in consonance with the recommendations of the 7th Pay Commission and will have a retrospective effect from 1st January 2016, in case the Bill is passed. The Bill seeks to amend the High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 and Supreme Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1958. The Bill also proposes a hike in the House Rent Allowance of the High and Supreme Court judges with effect from 1st July 2017. Further, the Bill seeks to amend sumptuary allowances retrospectively from 22nd September 2017.

The Need For Hike In Salaries

The Bill is in consonance with the plea made by Former Chief Justice of India, Hon’ble Justice TS Thakur in 2016, requesting the government to raise the salary of the High Court and Supreme Court judges. The hike in salaries will bring the pay scale of the judges on par with the bureaucrats. The Supreme Court is currently having 25 judges instead of 31 and the High Courts are having 682 out of 1079 judges. This move will also benefit 2500 retired judges. On 31st January 2018, the President of India gave his assent to the bill.

The need to increase the salaries, allowances, and pension of the Judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts has been necessitated because of the increase in the salaries, allowances and pensions of the Central Government employees on acceptance of the recommendations of the Seventh Central Pay Commission by the Government.

Key Highlights Of The Bill

The High Court and Supreme Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Amendment Bill, 2017 seeks to revise the salaries of the Judges with effect from the 1st day of January 2016, as follows:—

Chief Justice of India — from Rs. 1,00,000/- per month to Rs. 2,80,000/- per month

Judges of Supreme Court — from Rs. 90,000/- per month to Rs. 2,50,000/- per month

Chief Justice of High Court — from Rs. 90,000/- per month to Rs. 2,50,000/- per month

Judges of the High Court — from Rs. 80,000/- per month to Rs. 2,25,000/- per month.

Based on the recommendations of the Seventh Central Pay Commission, the Central Government has decided to grant additional quantum of pension and family pension with reference to the age of the Central Government pensioner and family pensioner. On the same analogy, it has been decided to extend similar benefits to all retired Judges.

Lateral Consequences

The Bill, if enacted and brought into operation, will involve an additional expenditure of approximately Rs. 20 crore out of which a recurring expenditure of Rs. 12 crores per annum for payment of salary and Rs. 8 crores as non-recurring expenditure towards arrears of salaries, pension and family pension from the Consolidated Fund of India.

Whether the Bill is a constructive move aimed at empowering the judiciary and ensuring equity in their pay or an exaggerated tool that provides more to a Judge than what the people of the country can afford- the answer is not simple and straight. Herein lies the scope for independent perspectives.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

Uttarakhand High Court Directed State Authorities To Frame SOP Regarding Kumbh Mela 2021

Noticing the commencement date of Kumbh Mela 2021 amid pandemic from 27 February 2021, the Uttarakhand High Court on Monday expressed concern with regard to organizing and conducting of the Mela and directed State Authorities to discuss and resolve the logistical problems which can come in organizing the Mela during the pandemic time.

Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Mahindra Finance, Being a Purely Private Body: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court reiterated that Writ Petition against the purely private body is not maintainable and dismissed the petition which was filed against Mahindra Finance Bank as Arif Khan v. Branch Manager Mahindra Finance Sultanpur & Another.

Publication of Notices for Inter-Faith Marriages No Longer Mandatory: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has passed a landmark judgment that likely brings relief to inter-faith marriage. The Court on Wednesday said that the mandatory publication of Notices of Inter-Faith marriages will now be optional to protect the Privacy and Liberty of the Couple. The Court observed that the publication of the notice would “invade the fundamental rights of liberty and privacy”. Therefore, it has made it optional for the couple, they can now request in form of writing to a marriage officer to publish or not to publish a notice regarding the marriage.

Bombay High Court to NIA: Consider Health and Age of Varavara Rao Before Opposing His Bail Plea

The Bombay HC on Wednesday observed that ‘we are all humans’ and asked the National Investigation Agency and the Maharashtra Government to consider the health and age of the Telugu poet-activist Varavara Rao before making submissions in response to his bail plea application on medical grounds.

Supreme Court Agrees To Examine Centre’s Plea To Keep Adultery a Crime in Armed Forces

The Centre appealed to the Supreme court on Wednesday, pleading that the 2018 judgment of decriminalizing adultery under IPC must not apply to the armed forces. The Supreme Court in a path-breaking verdict in 2018 decriminalized adultery and declared all its provisions unconstitutional as it diminishes the value of women, but maintained that it continues to be a ground for divorce.

Supreme Court Examines the Pollution in Yamuna River for the Second Time

The Supreme Court on Wednesday made a second attempt to clean the Yamuna river by taking a Suo Moto Cognizance of significantly high levels of ammonia water discharged from neighbouring states like Haryana into Delhi.

Fetus Suffering From Anencephaly, Woman’s Plea To Terminate 28-Weeks Pregnancy Allowed by Delhi HC

Based on the report of the medical board constituted by AIIMS, the Delhi High Court on Monday allowed a petition filed by a woman seeking the termination of her 28-weeks pregnancy. They said in its report that the fetus suffered from anencephaly, a disorder where the skull bone is not developed and was thus incompatible with life, therefore her fetus can be aborted.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -