Lok Sabha Passes Bill To Raise Salaries Of High Court And Supreme Court Judges

Must Read

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

The Debate Between IPR and Competition Law Explained

There are various market processes or structures that govern market scenario. For simplicity, this paper focuses on two mechanisms:...

The Competition Law Regime and Re-Tooling Patent Pools In India

The adversity to acquire licenses of various patented technologies can thwart the commercialization as well as the development of...

Follow us

The High Court And Supreme Court Judges (Salaries And Conditions Of Service) Amendment Bill, 2017

On 4th January 2018, the Lok Sabha passed a Bill (The High Court and Supreme Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Amendment Bill, 2017) introducing a hike in salaries of the High Court and the Supreme Court judges. The Bill is now pending in Rajya Sabha. Once the bill becomes a law, the Chief Justice of India will get a salary of Rupees 2.80 lakhs instead of the prevailing one lakh. The judges of the High Court will get Rupees 2.25 lakhs per month instead of the prevailing 80,000. The salary hike is in consonance with the recommendations of the 7th Pay Commission and will have a retrospective effect from 1st January 2016, in case the Bill is passed. The Bill seeks to amend the High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 and Supreme Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1958. The Bill also proposes a hike in the House Rent Allowance of the High and Supreme Court judges with effect from 1st July 2017. Further, the Bill seeks to amend sumptuary allowances retrospectively from 22nd September 2017.

The Need For Hike In Salaries

The Bill is in consonance with the plea made by Former Chief Justice of India, Hon’ble Justice TS Thakur in 2016, requesting the government to raise the salary of the High Court and Supreme Court judges. The hike in salaries will bring the pay scale of the judges on par with the bureaucrats. The Supreme Court is currently having 25 judges instead of 31 and the High Courts are having 682 out of 1079 judges. This move will also benefit 2500 retired judges. On 31st January 2018, the President of India gave his assent to the bill.

The need to increase the salaries, allowances, and pension of the Judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts has been necessitated because of the increase in the salaries, allowances and pensions of the Central Government employees on acceptance of the recommendations of the Seventh Central Pay Commission by the Government.

Key Highlights Of The Bill

The High Court and Supreme Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Amendment Bill, 2017 seeks to revise the salaries of the Judges with effect from the 1st day of January 2016, as follows:—

Chief Justice of India — from Rs. 1,00,000/- per month to Rs. 2,80,000/- per month

Judges of Supreme Court — from Rs. 90,000/- per month to Rs. 2,50,000/- per month

Chief Justice of High Court — from Rs. 90,000/- per month to Rs. 2,50,000/- per month

Judges of the High Court — from Rs. 80,000/- per month to Rs. 2,25,000/- per month.

Based on the recommendations of the Seventh Central Pay Commission, the Central Government has decided to grant additional quantum of pension and family pension with reference to the age of the Central Government pensioner and family pensioner. On the same analogy, it has been decided to extend similar benefits to all retired Judges.

Lateral Consequences

The Bill, if enacted and brought into operation, will involve an additional expenditure of approximately Rs. 20 crore out of which a recurring expenditure of Rs. 12 crores per annum for payment of salary and Rs. 8 crores as non-recurring expenditure towards arrears of salaries, pension and family pension from the Consolidated Fund of India.

Whether the Bill is a constructive move aimed at empowering the judiciary and ensuring equity in their pay or an exaggerated tool that provides more to a Judge than what the people of the country can afford- the answer is not simple and straight. Herein lies the scope for independent perspectives.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -