Lok Sabha passed The New Delhi International Arbitration Bill 2018

Must Read

Explained: The Scope of Article 21 During the Era of COVID-19

“One’s right to self, their body, their health, and their livelihoods is inherent to living a meaningful human life, Human...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

The Debate Between IPR and Competition Law Explained

There are various market processes or structures that govern market scenario. For simplicity, this paper focuses on two mechanisms:...

The Competition Law Regime and Re-Tooling Patent Pools In India

The adversity to acquire licenses of various patented technologies can thwart the commercialization as well as the development of...

Solving Healthcare Issues Using Blockchain Technology

In troubled times that follow a pandemic, almost all nations are forced to take stock of the gaps present...

Follow us

Lok Sabha passed The New Delhi International Arbitration bill which replaces the International Centre for Alternative Dispute Resolution which was established under the Societies Registration Act in 1995 and gave international Arbitration centre an independent and autonomous status which will enhance its management competencies. In order to make India a hub of international arbitration and a centre of robust ADR mechanism, A High Powered committee headed by Justice B N Srikrishna, a former Supreme Court judge, was formulated by the central government in order to review the institutionalization of arbitration mechanism. In its report, the committee submitted that the international centre for alternative dispute resolution which works under the aegis of Supreme Court has grossly proven ineffective in terms of addressing the growing need of intuitional arbitration and proposed to give International Arbitration Centre an autonomous status. Considering its suggestions, the bill was introduced by the Minister of State for Law and justice, Mr. P.P Chaudhary on January 5, 2018, in Lok Sabha. The bill seeks to declare The New Delhi Arbitration centre as an institute of national importance and free from any interference of any external agency so that the intuition can utilize its infrastructure and all the other facilities to its optimum level as well as incorporate a robust institution for domestic and international arbitration. As proposed by the bill, the head office of the centre shall be at Delhi and it may with the previous approval of the Central Government, establish branches at other places in India and abroad. As far as the composition of the institution is concerned, the centre will consist of –

 i) a chairperson who may be the judge of the Supreme Court or a High Court or an eminent person having special knowledge and experience in the conduct or administration of arbitration, appointed by the Central Government in consultation with the Chief Justice of India—Chairperson;

(ii) two eminent persons having substantial knowledge and experience in institutional arbitration, both domestic and international, appointed by the Central Government—full-time or part-time Members;

(iii) One representative of a recognized body of commerce and industry, chosen on a rotational basis by the Central Government—part-time Member;

(iv) Secretary to the Government of India in the Ministry of Law and Justice or his representative, not below the rank of the Joint Secretary—Member, ex officio;

(v) One Financial Adviser nominated by the Ministry of Finance—Member, ex officio; and

(vi)  Chief Executive Officer—Member, ex officio.

The tenure of the members shall be of three years from the date on which they enter upon their office or till the age of 70 years for the chairperson and 67 years for the person, whichever occur earliest and shall be eligible for reappointment. The essential objectives and functions of the New Delhi International Arbitration Centre will be-

  1. To provide assistance for arbitral, mediation, conciliation and other alternative dispute resolution matters
  2. To lay downs guidelines for different modes of dispute resolution which can be adopted by centre
  3. To provide facilities in order to improve the management and conduct the arbitral proceeding in a cost-effective manner
  4. To collaborate with other intuitions at National and International level to ascertain the credibility of the Centre as a specialized institution in arbitration and conciliation
  5. To promote research and study
  6. to maintain panels of accredited arbitrators, conciliators, and mediators both at national and international level

The accounts of the centre will be audited and certified by the Comptroller and auditor general of India and all the funds received by the institution will be granted by the central government from the fee collected for its activities and other sources. The bill is a major step taken towards making India a hub of domestic and international arbitration .it promotes to resolve disputes amicably without indulging into rigorous court procedures and ensuring that justice is attained by all at shortest time span possible. With a lot of commercial disputes, it is necessary to have a proper arbitration mechanism in place for fastening resolution process and therefore, establishing an autonomous body would ensure the parties of dispute from any external influence on the decision-making process of the institution and boost their credence in the mechanism.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -