Legal Issues Over Rashtra Rishi’s Coronil Claims

Must Read

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

The Debate Between IPR and Competition Law Explained

There are various market processes or structures that govern market scenario. For simplicity, this paper focuses on two mechanisms:...

Follow us

As countries scuffle with the global pandemic, pseudoscientific Ayurvedic solutions mislead public attention. One of them is Baba Ramdev’s Patanjali which has recently launched the Corona Kit. It claims to cure COVID-19 in 7 days. But, the Ayush Ministry did not approve of it. It directed Patanjali to stop advertising such cures that were not authenticated. 

During this pandemic, jittery patients are eager to get a cure for Corona. These claims divert their attention the most. Aren’t such false claims diverting public faith towards pseudoscientific treatments? Aren’t such claims daunting when it comes to public health?

Patanjali’s Coronil: A Brief Background

This is not the first time that YOG GURU has developed a miraculous drug for curing people’s maladies. However, miracles like these couldn’t get a clean chit from authorities. In December 2016, Patanjali was fined Rs. 11 Lakhs for misleading advertisements. The ASCI had pulled up Patanjali for misleading ads. These were for honey, jam, and mustard oil, which were substandard. It is surprising that even after this, public trust remains unruffled.

After a dubious past, Patanjali has now launched its Corona Kit. It is clinically tested (after CTRI approval) and is an evidence-based drug. Uttarakhand authorities had licensed Patanjali for immunity tablets and not for COVID-19. Moreover, there had been previous AYUSH orders for stopping advertisements for Corona cures. Another notification of the Ministry was for following the protocol. Also, apprising the Ministry of research development was also mentioned. Yet, Patanjali hadn’t mentioned the results before the launch of the miraculous elixir. 

Legal Roadway against Patanjali’s Trust Erosion Drive

Such pseudoscientific cures come under the ambit of Drugs and Magic Remedies Act, 1954. The unverified claims of Patanjali come under Section 4, punishment against misleading advertisements. Rule 170 of the Drugs and Cosmetic Rules, 2018 also forbids the advertising of AYUSH drugs. Especially for therapeutic purposes. Patanjali has already launched and advertised it via a press conference in Haridwar. Moreover, previous orders from the AYUSH Ministry had already forbidden such advertising. 

Other legal paths against such misleading advertisements also exist. Some of them are-

  • Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 granting power to grant directions. 
  • Rule 7 of Cable Television Network Rules, 1994 preventing advertisements suffering from irregularities. 
  • Section 6 of the Cable Television Network Regulation Act, 1995 prohibiting advertisements. The prohibition was for advertisements not adhering to the Code.

Eroding public trust comes with a cost. A Criminal Complaint has also been filed against Baba Ramdev and Patanjali’s MD. The complaint was filed because Patanjali was putting people’s health at stake. The complainant, Tamanna Hashmi has levelled the charge of cheating. Other charges levelled were criminal conspiracy and spreading dangerous diseases. Maharashtra Government has also banned the sale of Unapproved mystical drug Coronil.

Intermediary Liability against Misleading Advertisements

The accountability- responsibility threshold increases for intermediaries. The intermediaries can attract greater attention during the lockdown. This is because no other platform is accessible. The Intermediary guidelines, 2011 was a rescue measure. This was brought in to prevent the intermediaries from taking up the safe harbour veil. However, more proactive steps are also required. 

Self-censorship rather than the take-down approach is more relevant. An example of this is the Information Trust Alliance by Facebook and Google. One can also refer to the Disaster Management Act and the Epidemic Diseases Act. 

Another rescue comes in the form of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. It has new guidelines for the e-commerce sector. The Act has provisions for holding manufacturers and endorsers accountable for misleading consumers. The only exception is if it is in the ordinary course of business.

International Steps in Curbing Misleading Advertisements

The ICAS, EASA, and CONARED had taken up a joint statement. The joint statement was against false and misleading advertisements. The ASA (UKs self-regulatory system) has issued guidance on responsible advertising.

The new fast track reporting form launched in the UK has worked hard to contact brands and remove them. They have also launched an online service to combat COVID 19 fake ads. Intermediaries like- Facebook, Twitter, YouTube have also taken up measures to block misleading ads.

Major trends of fraud during COVID has also shifted consumer behavioural patterns. More than 22,000 consumer complaints are lying with FTC in the USA. Japan’s FSA and NPA have started conducting joint investigations. This will entrap illegal lenders. Such steps can curb misleading advertisements saving public health and genuine businesses’ plight.

Conclusion and Recommendations

Misleading advertising is on a hike due to consumer demands. Rising misuse of public trust has also worsened the situation. Patanjali’s Coronil claims have eroded public trust and put their health at stake. Emotional and pseudoscientific appeals by YOGA Guru keeps them relaxed. Even so, it threatens their health more. The legal framework can help, provided some consumer awareness online campaigns operate.

Enforcement mechanisms can protect them from falling prey to such false claims. Some of the immediate steps are as follows:

1. Raising Consumer Awareness: Apprising Consumers of false claims through online campaigning can work wonders.

2. Establishing Dialogue with Businesses: Sharing information with businesses can make them aware of possible fraud.

3. International Co-operation and Sharing Experiences: The OECD Global Recalls Portal has a pool of international measures against such advertisements. These can help nations choose amongst the best.

4. Self-Responsibility by Intermediaries: Self-responsibility measures by intermediaries can help getting rid of misleading ads. These measures can be blocking, take-down measures, and censoring.

With such plausible mechanisms, the Government can abate misleading ads related to COVID-19.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -