Is It Viable to Ask for Payment of School Fees Amidst COVID-19?

Must Read

India’s International ‘Retrospective Taxation’ Regime Vis-a-Vis PCA Rulings in Vodafone and Cairn in 2020

The imposition of retrospective taxation of foreign companies doing business in India has been at the helm of controversy...

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Follow us

The COVID- 19 pandemic has led to a wide range of problems. It is becoming very difficult to curb and stop the disease from further snowballing. This has also led to the permanent closing of education institutions in the world. The emphasis has been laid on self-financed institutions which are dependent on school fees. Most states have released circulars to private institutions to stop collecting fees.

There is no doubt that this outbreak would place pressure on all households. This is because of an economic recession resulting from the pandemic. But it is important to recognize that the process of educating the children cannot be stopped. Thus, it is important to analyze the issue of school fees during the pandemic.

Plea in Supreme Court by Parents 

There was filing of a petition by a group of parents from different states in the Supreme Court. It was seeking to ease the payment of school fees in private schools for the months of April, May and June of this year. This was due to COVID-19 pandemic. The petition aims the center to direct private schools and state government. The direction need to be given to not charge any fees from students enrolling for a three-month period from April to June.

Charge Proportionally

The petitioners prayed for several instructions. That, schools should charge only fees which is proportional to the conduct of online classes. Also, the plea prays that only tuition fees must be collected and no other component of fees must be charged. There is need of waiver is until normal physical classrooms can be started. Additionally, a complete waiver of fees is sought from students whose parents are not engaged in any vocation at the moment or who have had a pay cut or who have no income because the COVID-19 pandemic and a lock-down between the months March and July. 

 Imposing Moratorium

The petition also includes a prayer to impose a moratorium on the payment of the fee for the students whose parents apply for such a deferment. It is prayed that the schools should not impose any penalty extra fee. The petition argues that no one should be removed from school because of non-payment of fees. The plea also mentions that students from disadvantaged groups cannot take part in the online course. This is due to lack of resources.

It added that schools have also increased their fees. This is because of the inability of schools and students to make use of any of the facilities offered by schools. Some schools even threatened the students’ parents in advance for full quarterly payment.

Circulars

The petition claimed that circulars were obtained from many States seeking private aided/unaided schools not to increase their fees during the pandemic. But there was no provision of substantive relief in the form of discounted fees, or proportionate fees. Parents were given a massive financial burden to deal with. Thus, infringing on and violating the right of students to life and education. The plea states: 

“The Petitioners belonging to different states of the country have come together being constrained to approach this Court seeking inter alia the protection of fundamental right to life as well as education guaranteed under the Constitution of India, 1950 which the children & students enrolled up to the Class XII of various Indian states are being deprived of due to supervening factors namely, the ongoing pandemic- COVID-19 period.” 

The Order by Punjab and Haryana High Court 

The Punjab and Haryana High Court permitted private schools in the state to collect tuition fee, annual charges, and admission fee from students even though the schools were closed because of the lockdown. The judgment also states that schools can charge tuition fees although they have not provided online classes to their students during the period of the lockdown. But the Court has ruled that schools must have to make attempts to conduct online classes. This was done so that education does not fail as a result of current and future lockdowns imposed due to the pandemic.

In a comprehensive ruling, the judge specified that the administration of each school would determine the real expenses incurred for the time when the school remain closed. The schools could only recover legitimate expenses incurred by the them. For example, actual costs for travel and the actual building costs. The Court stated that schools are restricted from increasing charges for 2020-21. They are still subject to the same structure of fees as for 2019-20. 

The judgment mentioned that if a parent is unable to pay the fees, he can file an application. This can be done along with a proof of financial status. The Schools would have to look into these applications. It will also give concessions to the students. 

The Court also allowed the schools to move a representation to the district education officer concerned. This will be done if they face a financial crunch because of not having charged the increased fee for 2020-21. The officer will look into the application, along with the proof of financial crunch submitted. He will then “pass appropriate orders within three weeks”, the judge said. 

Conclusion

Families who are financially disabled have to pay a higher price for their children because of COVID-19. It could leave a couple of them no choice but to cut off their children or students for an unforeseeable period from the path of institutional/educational schooling. This will be due to constant financial and emotional difficulties. The decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court amid the crisis is welcoming. But, it seems that there is no point in collecting fees from students when schools do conduct any online classes for them.

Special provisions need to be made for financially and economically backward students. This will ensure that parents do not face any emotional or financial stress because of payment of school fees. It will also ensure that students are not forced to drop out of schools due to non-payment of fees. But there needs to be monitoring of the position of schools to deal with such a crisis.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -