Amidst the Black Lives Matter Movement, HUL drops Fair in ‘Fair and Lovely’

Must Read

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

The Debate Between IPR and Competition Law Explained

There are various market processes or structures that govern market scenario. For simplicity, this paper focuses on two mechanisms:...

Follow us

Hindustan Unilever (HUL) announced that it will be rebranding its popular fairness cream ’Fair & Lovely’ by dropping the use of the word ‘Fair’ because of the ongoing anti-racism and anti-color movement in the United States and around the world, the Black Lives Matter movement. The movement has led to the revival of talks on the role of India in promulgating colourism within its borders. Amidst the demonstrations there were several online petitions demanding for a ban on the fairness cream brands like Fair & Lovely. One of the petitions on Change.org required HUL to take accountability for the brand which, it claims, is the “expression of colorism and anti-blackness.”

Instead of “fairness, whiteness and lightness,” the company cites using words like “ glow, even tone, skin clarity and radiance” as a sign of its commitment to “celebrate all skin tones.” The Company said that by dropping the word fair from the brand name it is taking forward the brand’s journey towards a more inclusive vision of beauty.

Move by other Brands 

The Black Lives Matter movement has gathered momentum globally. It has forced companies to reassess their businesses and marketing for signs of discrimination. Earlier, amid the campaigns of ‘The Black Lives Matter,’ Johnson & Johnson, the US health and FMCG giant, decided to discontinue its skin-whitening creams.

J&J said that it will stop the sale of Clean & Clear Fairness product line, which is available in India. The company stopped its Neutrogen Fine Fairness line in Asia earlier this month. 

The normalization of fair skin through Bollywood and Indian regional cinema is rampant. It has led to an almost national preference for light skin in other streams of life, such as marriage. After a petition signed by more than 1,600 people, India’s popular marriage website, shaadi.com, removed the color filter overnight on its website, calling it a ‘blind spot.’

The Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) (Amendment) Bill, 2020

The Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) (Amendment) Bill, 2020 tried to make deceptive advertisements that advertise fair creams, weight reducing tablets, etc. punishable by statute. Yet the catch here is that companies have not avoided advertising for perfect and fair skin.

Not only does this advertising gimmick make people think that they will end up with better skin, but they also seek anxiety in someone who hears the ringing tales of “fairer skin.” That job, the companion you like, is all created by “fairer” skin.

Previous case on Emami

In the case of M/S Emami Ltd. vs Nikhil Jain, Paras Jain received R 15 lakhs from India’s biggest fairness cream brand Emami. This was because of the allegedly false claims of fairness that created psychological difficulties for his brother Nikhil Jain. Jain had sued Emami at the consumer court for unfair trade practices. He contended that the advertisement claimed that the cream fair and handsome would make the customer’s skin tone lighter within four weeks. But, there was no change in his skin tone.

Emami argued that its product seeks to enhance the skin’s safety and consistency by and preserving the skin on its face and back. Besides, the Court dismissed Emami ‘s contentions. The Court observed that it was contrary to its advertised claim for assured fairness. It was thus “misrepresentation.” The Court also prohibited fairness cream ads from showing darker-complexioned people as unhappy.

Yet, nothing seems to have changed from this case. This is because still fairness and colorism exists in India promoted by these fairness creams. Is it enough to drop the word “fair” to fight fair and lovely bias?

Colourism in India 

India ‘s struggle with colourism goes deeper than the mechanics of a fairness cream industry. Lighter skin has historically been equated to an indicator of power, wealth and privilege in India. Unilever’s Fair & Lovely brand based on deeply developed beauty ideals in India. India is the second largest market for the business, where darker skin is viewed as undesirable. In India’s largest magazines, matrimonial advertisements are regularly specifying the need for a ‘fair’ bride.

Diverse Portrayal of Beauty 

Hindustan Unilever Chairman Sanjiv Mehta announced that this move aims “to make skincare portfolio more inclusive” and celebrate “a more diverse portrait of beauty.” But, the change remains at the level of branding. Besides, the product details on the website of the company are still targeted at ‘fairness problems such as darkness.’ A melanin suppressant melanin listed among the ingredients. It is uncertain whether the renamed cream aims to treat skin differently from the old tubes of Fair and Lovely. This is because there are pictures contrasting a glum dark face with a beaming paler face.

So far, there is no evidence that Unilever or Shaadi.com inspired by anything other than the need to keep up with changing popular culture and usage. In major parts of India, fairness might be fetishized – for years, ads have encouraged prospective brides to use fairness creams to find a good match. The cream packaging may have modified but not it’s, in essence, content.

It is unclear about how the dropping of the word would change the purpose of the product, which is, in essence, a fairness cream. Unilever is coming out, seeking to undo an error it started 45 years ago. But, can systemic racism with which we grew up and lived all our lives be erased by eradicating ‘fair’ from ‘Fair & Lovely? Simply renaming the brand is not enough especially if the product continues to serve the same bias.

Campaigns such as Dark is beautiful in recent years have challenged Indian’s obsession with light skin. Currently, Bollywood stars and famous beauty pageants have been called up in social media by urban educated women for promoting colorism. But these campaigns have had very little impact. The popularity of the fairness creams has not diluted with the demand continuing to rise. 

Conclusion

This move by Unilever to drop the word Fair from ‘Fair & Lovely’ is a step towards inclusion. But, it a very small step of a much larger fight to end colourism. This archaic idea of colourism has benefitted many classes of people. Groups such as the entertainment industry, media conglomerates and whitening companies have spent billions of dollars to create an image that is very false, hierarchical, and racist. fair skin is the only type of skin worthy.

Thus, without an aggressive effort from corporations, media, and entertainment industries to tear down their underlying values, the cycle of colourism cannot be broken. Although this is a step in the right direction, even more work needs to be undertaken. How Unilever carries out its rebranding plan and new advertisement campaigns will highlight their true intentions.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -