Implementation of Goods and Services Tax

Must Read

The Right to Information and its Working of 15 years

On 12th October 2020, RTI finished fifteen years since its commencement. The question remains whether the legislation stands up to...

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

Follow us


“In this world, nothing can be said to be sure, with the exception of death and charges,” opined Benjamin Franklin ages ago.

In the existing framework, the energy of aberrant tax assessment is part between the Central Government and the State Governments that they can require to be imposed in their separate Entries of the Seventh Schedule. The Constitution puts certain confinements on circuitous charges, particularly, the assessment at a bargain and buy of merchandise which is a piece of Value Added Tax.

The idea of GST was first mooted in the year 2000 by the Vajpayee Government. To make this fantasy genuine, the Kelkar team on Fiscal Consolidation was constituted.

Later under the present NDA government driven by Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi, the Cabinet endorsed the Constitutional (122nd Amendment) Bill, 2014 on 18th December 2014. From that point, the bill was presented in the Lok Sabha on 19th December 2014. Finally, the bill has gone through both the houses.

This Good and Service Tax is Value Added Tax (VAT) and should supplant the vast majority of the aberrant charges existing at the level of state and central governments. This will be a complete duty for all products and enterprises.

In spite of the fact that a portion of the merchandise like unrefined petroleum, flammable gas, turbine fuel, fast diesel, instruction and liquor for human utilization are exempted, GST includes expensive products and enterprises that are paid by the last customer while the retailer would be assuming praise of assessment he has paid while purchasing merchandise for retailing. The presentation of GST might subsume various Union and State charges supplanted with a solitary tax collection framework.

At the Central level, the accompanying assessments will be subsumed: (a) Central Excise Duty (b) Additional Excise Duty (c) Service Tax (d) Countervailing Duty and Special Additional obligation of traditions. While the State Taxes subsumed are: (a) State Value Added Tax (b) Entertainment Tax (c) Central Sales Tax (d) Octroi (e) Entry Tax and Purchase Tax.

Advancement of GST in India

The One Hundred and First Constitutional (Amendment) Act, 2016 tries to change the assessment net topsy turvy, giving both the Center and the State the ability to make law on GST. The State Legislature will have the energy to make laws concerning the intra-state exchange and business while the Parliament will have a particular energy to make laws as for between state exchange and trade as has been given under the recently embedded Article 246A.

To maintain a strategic distance from any contention of the authoritative energy of Center and State, the residuary energy of enactment under Article 248 is made subject to the recently embedded Article 246. In a similar interest, both State and Union run down stands altered to offer impact to the Substantial GST arrangement regarding energy to enact.

Article 279A has been added to constitute the almighty GST Council, so a supra-government body can administer the working, execution and smooth running of GST.

It likewise accommodates constitution of Council within 60 days of the happening to the Amendment Act, 2016. Article 249 stands corrected to give that if by 2/3rd dominant part passes the determination; the parliament should make vital laws with deference to GST in the national interest.

Article 250 which accommodates Emergency energy of the Parliament to enact regarding the Entries in State list post of the declaration of Emergency stands changed to decide for the Parliament to make laws concerning GST in a highly sensitive situation.

In the light of the Constitutional 101st Amendment, the Union of India is committed to order enactments regarding Integrated Goods and Service Tax (IGST) and Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST), while the States need to administer concerning State Goods and Services Tax (SGST).

Advantages of implementation of GST in India

The advantages of GST administration are complex crosswise over different circles of the Indian economy which is compressed under different heads particularly business and industry:

  • Simple consistence: A strong and far reaching IT framework would be the establishment of the GST regime in India and in accordance with that, all the citizen administrations; for example, enrolments, returns, installments and so forth would be accessible to citizens on the web and hence would make consistence simple and straightforward.
  • The consistency of assessment rates and structures: GST will guarantee that aberrant expensive rates and structures that are regular the nation over, in this manner, will expand the duty lack of bias and simplicity of working together, regardless of the place of working together.
  • Expulsion of falling: An arrangement of consistent duty credits all through the chain, and over the limits of state would guarantee that there is negligible falling of duties.
  • Enhanced Competitiveness: Reduction in exchange expenses would inevitably prompt an enhanced intensity for exchange and industry.
  • Pick up to Manufacture and Exporters: By eliminating Central Sales charge and subsuming real Central and State imposes in GST, it would diminish the cost of privately produced merchandise and ventures will build the aggressiveness of Indian Goods and Services in the global market and offer a lift to Indian fares. The consistency in charge rates and techniques the nation over will likewise go far in decreasing the consistency cost.
  • Basic and simple to manage: Multiple backhanded expenses at the Central and State levels are supplanted by GST. Upheld with a strong IT framework would be less complex and simple to direct. GST is required to diminish the cost of accumulation of assessment incomes of the Government and will accordingly prompt higher income proficiency.

Consumers and GST

Single and Transparent expense proportionate to the estimation of products and ventures: Due to various roundabout assessments on us being imposed by the Center and State, with fragmented or no info charge credits accessible at dynamic phases of significant worth expansion, the cost of the most merchandise and enterprises in the nation having many concealed duties. Under GST, there would be just a single expense from the producer to the shopper, prompting straightforwardness of duty paid to the last buyers.

Alleviation in general taxation rate: Because of productivity additions and anticipation of spillages, the general taxation rate on most wares will descend which will profit purchasers.

Concerns Related to GST

GST and Tectonic move in Center-State Relations: The new GST administration proclaims a structural move in Center-State relations. By bringing together the arrangement of circuitous tax collection, it has prompted a worry in a few quarters that the new tax collection administration will undermine the government structure of administration. Various State Governments have raised their worries and misgivings about the effect of GST

GST and Apprehension of Manufacturing States: The other zone of concern is that there is a tremendous difference between the assembling states and the buyer states. The assembling states are less in number while purchaser states are more. Hence, the greater part of devouring states may vote against the enthusiasm of assembling states, in this manner bargaining the assembling quality of those states and therefore invalidating the very point of GST.

GST’s effect on the Socio-Politico-Economic system of States: Each State picks its own State Government in the light of its extraordinary political and financial plan. Presently for the sake of consistency and accommodation, if GST chamber bargains the self-rule and limit of the states to convey on those motivations, at that point the entire soul of government administration will take a secondary lounge.

GST: The Way Ahead

The genuine trial of the adequacy of the GST might lie with “We, the general population of India”, for the natives should choose the destiny of this sui generis administration. A perfect situation is conceivable just when the tax assessment framework in a nation is unbiased in the application, which means in this way, the duty ought to be a uniform rate of the last retail cost of the item, paying little attention to the production network courses of action for its assembling and dispersion.

Likewise if all political gatherings, whatever their belief systems, can transcend their parochial concern and work towards the objective of a solid, joined together and monetarily prosperous India, for the huge number of everyday citizens pondering destitution, ailment, lack of education, abuse and debasement since autonomy, the new GST framework can be guaranteed achievement. With the progression of time, the imperfections or the provisos of the framework can be concealed or enhanced. The less created states would be pulled up and value can be set up between the diverse ranges of the nation. This would be the correct stride toward the “Welfare State “objective of our Constitution, in view of the vigorous economy and giving equivalent chances of development and shield to all nationals.

“Tax assessment ought not to be an agonizing procedure. There ought to be equivalent adjust and tolerance in choosing charge structure. Through GST administration, Government is attempting to gather assets like a bumble bee, which sucks only the perfect measure of nectar from bloom so that both can survive”.


It can’t be denied that the Amendment Act, 2016 has been passed after incredible challenges and a substantial number of rounds of arrangement with all partners. In the meantime, it will be off base to state that the GST will have a smooth sail from here onwards. The aim behind the change is an honorable one and if effective, will brag the economy for good.

In any case, it is too soon to fathom at this stage. The present Amendment act, 2016 may have disengaged itself from any established test. However, the IGST, CGST and SGST should bear the nearby assessment of the Courts as these are the administrative instruments through which GST will be executed in its actual sense.

In the due course of time, the Constitution and the power is given to GST Council brings up major issues about shielding and self-rule of States and infringement of Central Government into State undertakings and the elected structure of the country.

In a nation like India where distinctive States have been administered by various political gatherings with diverse motivation and belief systems, it will be hard to blend any uniform plan and that too by a Council which is seen as being twisted in the support of Center and a voting framework where the states will get themselves detached over their individual concern.

It is justified regardless of the hold up to perceive how the Central and the State Governments manage these issues in the upcoming circumstances.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Germany had violated the...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Supreme Court Asks Petitioner to Approach Bombay High Court in PIL for CBI Probe in Disha Salian Case

On the 26th of October 2020, the Apex Court heard the PIL praying for a CBI probe into the death of Disha Salian. The...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -