Impact of COVID-19 on Alcohol, Myths About Consumption Of Alcohol During COVID-19 And the Need To Increase Taxes

Must Read

The Debate Between IPR and Competition Law Explained

There are various market processes or structures that govern market scenario. For simplicity, this paper focuses on two mechanisms:...

The Competition Law Regime and Re-Tooling Patent Pools In India

The adversity to acquire licenses of various patented technologies can thwart the commercialization as well as the development of...

Solving Healthcare Issues Using Blockchain Technology

In troubled times that follow a pandemic, almost all nations are forced to take stock of the gaps present...

How Artificial Intelligence is Transforming the Legal Profession

In recent times, we have seen the introduction of artificial intelligence on a small yet phenomenally successful scale in...

Approaching the von Neumann Bottleneck: Neuromorphic Computing & beyond

“There are one trillion synapses in a cubic centimeter of the brain. If there is such a thing as...

Is India Truly Following the Footsteps of Mahatma Gandhi?

On October 2, 2020, it was the 151st birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi. India couldn’t celebrate it due to...

Follow us

Many of us believe that alcohol prohibition and Alcohol ban have the same meaning. In reality alcohol prohibition denotes that the making, selling, transporting and distribution of any type of alcohol as an illegal act. Ban is for limited time which can be in the form of dry days or some emergency. The transportation and distribution do not stop only selling is then prohibited. This article talks about the impact of COVID-19 on alcohol, myths about the consumption of alcohol during COVID and the need of the government to increase the taxes.

Impact of COVID-19

According to a report by WHO (2016) annual per capita consumption of alcohol in India is 5.7lt. With the lockdown coming in effect many regular customers were affected. Their consumptions were halted and the lockdown extension affected the manufacturers. Countries like South Africa completely banned sale and import of alcohol. While countries like France, Greenland banned alcohol where number of cases were higher. Other countries like U.S and U.K included wine and spirit stores in the list of ‘essential’ businesses.

Edelweiss a beer making company surveyed its Indian customers during lockdown. According to the survey 80% respondents said they have reduced their cigarette consumption. Over two third have gone away with their bad habit. The reasons that were then cited by them include of not smoking at home and unavailability of their preferred brands.

According to analysts at Edelweiss, this will change consumer habits in the near time. Due to the lockdown the supply chains were further disrupted. This made the manufactures like John breweries to sell alcohol based sanitisers. The reasons were the dip in revenue and it being coming under the essential items. Coming to the negative side many people experienced withdrawals. In the extreme cases people committed suicide due to unavailability. Kerala being at the top position where people committed suicide. Followed by Tamil Nadu.

Myth Busters relating to Alcohol 

Methanol, ethanol, and bleach were then used as disinfectants to kill the Virus. People especially in rural areas across the country thought that drinking them would cure the virus. Actually they are poisons which harm the body. Many people also thought that drinking alcohol will protect them virus. In reality it decreases the immunity and increases the risk of other health problems.

Post-Lockdown Effects 

Due to the loss in the economic activity many governments eased their restrictions. West countries did not have a complete ban like India and south Africa. But they too were hit hard by the lockdown. In the United States, “on-trade” drinking at bars and restaurants accounts for about 20% of spirits sales and 25% for beer. After lockdown this went down to 16% due to the fear of the virus.

In India cities like Mumbai observed long queues. People made mockery of social distancing norms and started panic buying. According to the report a man purchased liquor worth rupees 52000. This was not a surprise as harsh lockdowns escalated the demand for booze.

States like Andra Pradesh, Karnataka and West Bengal were no different. Retailers observed long queues which resulted in running out of stock by 11a.m. To curb this maniac buying government like Delhi increased taxes. It introduced a new tax “Corona fee” which was 70% of MRP. This results in taxes amounting to 3.5 crore collected by the excise department.

Mumbai banned the sales once again but allowed home delivery. But in Tamil Nadu especially in district Karaikal there was an average turnout. On the other side Women in Uttarakhand protested the move. Stating that it will take a toll on already-low household incomes, joblessness and the family. Rights activists have said opening liquor shops will add to domestic violence against women, which had already increased during the lockdown period.

Was it a bad idea to regulate alcohol?

According to a 2019 report by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), there are nearly 160 million people in India who consume alcohol. Out of whom nearly 57 million are addicted. 

At First place these addicted people will be further affected with withdrawal symptoms. This will result in increased health costs which will be incurred by the states. In the states like Kerala seven people committed suicide because of unavailability of alcohol. These incidents make States to take action which otherwise was not intended.

Second is the Revenue. The ban costs states to loose crores of revenue especially in these times where the economic activities are then halted. It is then estimated that States earn 15-30% of their revenue through taxes on alcohol. Till April 30, the estimated revenue loss from ban on sale of alcohol was Rs 24,000 crore.

The liquor industry also found itself in dire straits, as retail shops sat on unsold stock. More than a million workers were not at work. Meanwhile, in the absence of any consumers, 800,000 litres of beer found its way down the drain.

The ban on alcohol also resulted in illicit distilling and brewing across India. In Kerala at least 505 people were further arrested for brewing wash. Many retailers took the advantage and marketed the bottle thrice the MRP.

Conclusion

Under pressure from states as well as drying coffers, the Centre was further forced to lift the ban on the sale of alcohol. But long queues trigger fears of chaos, police action and spread of COVID-19. The states charging exorbitant amount of taxes is not acceptable. They should have not allowed at first place. They should not impose the ban and be like west countries. Plenty of reports by WHO were available which proved that India is an alcoholic country. Banning and the reopening will definitely trigger the problems. These are times of great uncertainty and anxiety.

We do not know when the virus will vanish. So Government and States should take judicious actions for the future.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

Chandigarh Housing Board Is Bound To Implement the Chandigarh Administration’s Policy Decision: Punjab & Haryana High Court

On 15th October 2020, Justices Jaswant Singh and Sant Parkash heard the case of Bhartendu Sood vs Chandigarh Housing Board & Anr., via video-conferencing. Deeming the...

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Doctors Alleging Arbitrary Placement at Government Hospitals for One-Year Mandatory Public Service

The Bombay High Court was hearing a plea against the arbitrary placement of doctors for a mandatory period of one year. The petitioners prayed...

Uttarakhand High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Relief for the Cancellation of Selection Process

On 13th October 2020, a Single Judge Bench of Hon'ble Justice Lok Pal Singh, heard the case of Ashish Bisht & Anr. v. State...

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against National Stock Exchange For Lack Of Merit

In the case of A. Kumar v. Financial Intelligence Unit & Ors., A. Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

The Federal Appeals Court Holds Trump’s Diversion of Military Funds To Build the Wall To Be Unlawful

The Federal Appeals Court held that US President Donald Trump’s diversion of military funds to build the wall is unlawful. A grey area in the...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Filed Challenging the Judgment of Madras High Court in Ganesan v. State Represented by Its Inspector of Police

An appeal was filed before the Supreme court, challenging the judgment & order of Madras High Court. The Supreme Court upheld the HC judgment...

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Doctors Alleging Arbitrary Placement at Government Hospitals for One-Year Mandatory Public Service

The Bombay High Court was hearing a plea against the arbitrary placement of doctors for a mandatory period of one year. The petitioners prayed...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -