How COVID-19 Has Impacted the Suspension Of Labour laws In India

Must Read

Ed-Tech Companies and the Consumer Protection Act

In the present time when the whole country is getting back to normal after the wrath of the Coronavirus,...

The Right to Information and its Working of 15 years

On 12th October 2020, RTI finished fifteen years since its commencement. The question remains whether the legislation stands up to...

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

Follow us

Under the Constitution of India ‘Labour’ is a subject under the concurrent list. This implies both Central and State Government can enact laws. The laws which regulates the labour and protect the rights of them as well as the organization which they are part of are known as Labour Laws. The labour laws in India were prevalent since the British empire. For example, The Indian Slavery Act,1843, and Societies Registration Act,1860. These acts were intended to protect the interests of British employers. They were not implemented effectively, rather it created a new type of problem. The labourers were further deprived of their rights at their workplaces, paid less. Their health issues were not considered and their powers were also restricted.

After many strikes by their unions, it was in 1950 that the Indian Labour laws found a place in the constitution. It protected their rights and fulfilled all the issues that the protests raised. As suggested by many jurists, law changes with the change in society. New problems came up about child labour and employment of women, which led to laws evolving. 

Effect of COVID-19 On Labour laws 

The introduction of Covid-19 from the Wuhan market in China happened on 8th December. It entered in India and the government of India imposed a complete lockdown on 24th March. This move was necessary to stop the spread of virus as the cases were increasing. All the business, construction activities were further halted except for essential services. As a result, there was a widespread movement of migrated labourers to their homes. As of now around 23 lakh labourers are being migrated to the state of Uttar Pradesh. Further, 20 Lakh to Gujarat and 3.62 Lakh to Rajasthan. Many States revenue dipped to a record low. Various state governments moved towards changing their labour laws through amendments. (Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Gujarat). It happened to cut the impact of this pandemic on businesses and for their smooth operations.

The boldest move was by the U.P Government. It suspended the application of all labour laws in the state for the next three years. They also granted certain exceptions in the Industrial Disputes act, 1947. As well as the factories act, 1948. It also extended the working hours for three months. More or less the amendments were same by the other states also. These amendments will create employment opportunity. But companies are not willing to give new jobs. It will take time to generate positive results as the spread of the virus is not coming to a halt.

Challenges in Suspension of Labour Laws

The suspension of labour laws is definitely unconstitutional. It will be further challenged in the Courts. The revenues of all the companies have dipped due to which they are unable to give jobs. Daily increase in cases is also creating a problem in implementation. As saving the lives of the people is the first most priority. Restricting the migrant’s movement is violative of their rights. Not allowing them to go back to their employed state is violative of fundamental rights.

How other countries are responding 

Based on the impact of COVID-19 on GDP growth, the ILO estimates state a rise in global unemployment. This is between 5.3 million (“low” scenario) and 24.7 million (“high” scenario) from a base level of 188 million in 2019. Canada has about 60 thousand temporary foreign workers in the fields. They come from across the border and the country is facing a problem of work being incomplete. Thereby, the farmers fear loosing their crops due to unavailability of these labourers. To curb this issue currently, the government is allowing the workers to travel across the border. But there are delays as people are not preferring to leave their respective country. Spain, UK, Vietnam are facing the same problem of immigrant labourers as of Canada.

The problem in India is with interstate migrants so the solution is different. And the management is also not the same. The solution that the other countries have applied consists of million dollar packages. For example, Vietnam is giving 70 dollars per month for three months to the workers who were on unpaid leave. The most promising solution was by U.K, where the state in collaboration with the industries is paying 80% of the employee’s wage.

Author’s Note

The virus was unforeseeable. The vaccine will take time as the virus does not have the same structure across the countries. Currently it has 14 different structures confirmed. The lockdown was necessary to stop the spread of the virus. But it brought all the economic activities to a halt forcing the labourers to move to their states. Every country is facing the same problem of managing the labourers to continue the economic activities.

Coming out with packages proportionate of their GDP is a good step. But suspension of labour laws is completely unconstitutional. The Indian Government should collaborate with the industries to provide them work and giving them the wages. As it is already stated by WHO we have to live with the virus. The government should consider the future impact of their decisions. Suspension of labour laws is not a good solution to this as there is a huge amount of them.

One state cannot provide them with everything to free their movement. The other states should accept them otherwise people will die from hunger. In conclusion, all states and the centre should work to nullify the effect of this virus. They should follow the U.K Government’s plan to curb this issue. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

NGT Pulls up PMC, Asks to Shift Waste Processing Plant at Baner

  Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 27th October 2020, directed Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) to close the plant and shift it to...

Plea Seeking Dream 11 to Be Declared as Betting Platform Dismissed by Rajasthan High Court

Rajasthan HC dismissed a plea that alleged Dream 11 to be a betting platform, on the assertion that the game depends on skill &...

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped her in a dressing room,...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on behalf of all the minority...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the National Commission for Women. The...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Germany had violated the...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -