Honour Killing In the Times of COVID-19: Increase In Caste-Based Violence in India

Must Read

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

The Debate Between IPR and Competition Law Explained

There are various market processes or structures that govern market scenario. For simplicity, this paper focuses on two mechanisms:...

The Competition Law Regime and Re-Tooling Patent Pools In India

The adversity to acquire licenses of various patented technologies can thwart the commercialization as well as the development of...

Follow us

In India, caste-based violence has increased over the years, and honour killing is one of them. Marriage is the purest form of union between a man and a woman, tied with the rope of love and affection. However, in India, religion, case, custom, and the so-called “norms” of the society dominate and influence marriage. There is an age-old belief that a person can only marry the person of the same caste. It persists in many sections of society. Also, it is much reinforced and propagated by Khap Panchayats.

The 242nd report of Law Commission of India suggested a new legal framework titled, ‘Prevention of Interference with the Freedom of Matrimonial Alliances (in the name of Honour and Tradition): A Suggested Legal Framework’ on August 2012. It emphasized on limiting the role of Khap Panchayats to only the problems concerning the disputes prevailing between families. In addition to it, the Khap Panchayats should not interfere with the liberty of individuals who chose to marry outside their caste. The Supreme court has also issued some guidelines to prevent Khap Panchayat from misusing its position. As per them, the police can prevent Khap Panchayat from assembling by using Section 144 of the Code of Criminal procedure.

Instances of Honour Killings in the Lockdown

When the whole world is stressing over combating COVID-19, there has been an increase in the number of honour killing cases. On 27 March, a man in the Tiruvannamalai district of Tamil Nadu was killed for getting married to a girl outside his caste. After coming back from Chennai, he tried to meet his wife. However, the woman’s family forcefully nullified their marriage by a local panchayat. This is the prime example of casteism still prevailing over the law. In other words, the marriage solemnized legally but ended forcefully. Further, in April, a girl of Hoshiarpur was sedated by her family members. Consequently, she died. This happened because her family suspected that she eloped with a boy. The instances do not end here.

On 22 May, a family killed a girl who was pregnant. Further, on 7 June, a pregnant woman was killed by her parents as the child was of a lower caste man. Later, in the same month, a 16-year-old minor girl was killed by her father as she was having an affair. The reason behind most of these cases is casteism. Sadly, people have not yet got rid of their rigid mindset of discriminating based on caste. To sum, the author argue that the people in the name of killing for the honour, are glorifying casteism instead.

Udmalpet Honour Killing Case: Lost Faith in Judiciary or Humanity?

In 2016, Shankar was brutally killed by the goons sent by his wife’s father as he married a girl of upper caste. Afterward, in 2017, 11 people were charged with his death and 6 were sentenced to death. On 22 June, Madras High Court set aside the death sentence and acquitted B Chinnaswamy, father of the woman. Moreover, the Court set aside all the charges including criminal conspiracy.

Ignorance of essential facts in the case

Despite it being a clear case of honour killing and caste violence, the Court acquitted the culprit from all the charges. There was clear evidence to prove that Kausalaya’s father was guilty but eventually the High Court ignore the same. On top of that, Kausalya, herself gave a statement against her parents, which played an important role in the conviction. She was even happy with the previous judgment too. The CCTV footage of the victim which shows that he was brutally beaten went viral. It clearly showed how he became the victim of a conspiracy. Moreover, earlier, the Supreme Court directed all the Trial Courts and High Courts to treat honour killings as the “rarest of rare” cases. As a result, the Court should award death sentence which will act as a deterrence for future crimes.

However, the Court did not take a note of these circumstances while pronouncing the judgment. Considering that the 2017 judgment was ironic, the Madras High Court’s judgment is a shocking state of affairs. It was the second case in India where the Court pronounced 6 death sentences at once. Due to the involvement of the family in such cases, generally, women tend to not speak against their parents. But, in this case, the woman herself testified against her father and addressed the media boldly. It is pertient to observe that B Chinnaswamy was received with shawls when he came out of the jail by his caste members. This is just an act of glorifying honour killing and caste violence. As of now, the government counsel is considering challenging the High Court order in the Supreme Court.

A Need for a Separate Law?

Today, there is a dire need to have a separate law for addressing honour killing. Primarily, making it a separate offense would bring more clarity for law enforcement agencies. No doubt that killing someone is an offense under IPC but making it a specific crime will give more clarity for interpretation. Not only this but making it a separate offense would also give clear and reliable data on the number of honour killings committed.

Furthermore, there is no statutory definition of honour killing. And the international definitions are not enough for these casteism inspired killings. In addition to it, it has no legal recognition. Therefore, there are no proper statistics available. Symptomatically, such crimes do not exist in the records of the National Crime Records Bureau. There is no specific law for it, so usually, police, lawyers, judges consider it a normal murder case. As a result, they fail to recognize the answer to the question ‘what precedes such a heinous act?’.

An effective investigation process

The police generally do not register such cases fearing the dominant community of the village. Even if they get registered, the dominant community gets it unregistered. The investigation, examinations, and collection of evidence should be in accordance with the motive of honour killing. Implementation of specific laws would provide directions to police to protect couples. In 2018, it was decided by the center to propose a law to make honour killing a cognizable offense. Also, the center proposed to make a special cell in each district for receiving complaints from couples.

Rajasthan’s new Bill: Indicating the need for a separate law

The Rajasthan Prohibition of Interference with the Freedom of Matrimonial Alliances in the Name of Honour and Tradition Bill, 2019 was passed in the Rajasthan Assembly. It provides for life imprisonment or the death penalty for killing couples for the sake of honour. It is the first state to have a special law for honour killing. Furthermore, it is a non-bailable offense.

The Author’s Recommendations

The author proposes that the Indian Evidence Act should put the burden of proof on the accused, and a stricter implementation should be there. Furthermore, joint liability should be there to even punish the Khap Panchayat members. There should also be a special cell in both urban and rural areas to receive such complaints by the couple. In addition to it, a state should submit monthly reports of honour killing cases. Most importantly, other states should take inspiration from the Rajasthan assembly and make honour killing a separate offense. Also, conducting awareness campaigns about the same could help in educating people.

Lastly, casteism is the evil cause of honour killing. The author further believes a piece of legislation or guidelines would not be very effective to decrease the rate of honour killing, but a change in the mentality would be more effective. Hence, people should change their mindset and stop caste discrimination.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -