Farm Bills and Their Impact on Jammu & Kashmir

Must Read

The Right to Information and its Working of 15 years

On 12th October 2020, RTI finished fifteen years since its commencement. The question remains whether the legislation stands up to...

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...
Malik and Romaan Law Officeshttp://www.malikandromaan.com
Malik and Romaan Law Offices, Kashmir is a full-service Law Firm with its offices in Delhi, J&K and Mumbai

Follow us

The much talked about monsoon session of the Parliament culminated recently but not without controversies, sloganeering, and demonstrations. Apart from various other bills that saw the light of the day, the three key farm bills namely Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Bill, Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, and Essential Commodities (Amendment) Bill garnered maximum spotlight. Intriguingly, like all other legislations, these bills are very promising, or one may feel that they are being projected that way.

The newly introduced laws are stated to be farmer-friendly by promising to increase his income and freeing the sector from government control. However, it has caused a major commotion across the country with farmers already hitting the streets despite the pandemic. The government, on the other hand, asserts that these bills will revolutionize the agrarian sector, which collectively constitutes 60% of India’s economy and hence the growth of the sector would fundamentally impact the overall economy and vice versa.

The government has maintained that these bills will not abolish the traditional Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), popularly known as the “Mandi”. The farmer will now have a choice to sell his produce directly to APMC, private players, or corporates. However, there are fears that with the envisaged privatization of the agrarian sector, the state-controlled bodies are destined to lose their existence as has been seen in the case of Indian Airlines, Air India, BSNL and so many other PSU’s.

At the same time, the adversaries to these bills have argued that this system has already failed in the state of Bihar while other so-called reforms by the regime like demonetization and GST have done more harm than good. Even in developed economies like the USA, studies show that this capitalist free market system has not worked in favour of the farmers and some level of government control is necessary to maintain the equilibrium. The main reason for the extinction of government-run players from the market has been the unbeatable marketing warfare by corporate houses. However, successive governments have failed to notice the elephant in the room, which gives these corporates the upper hand.

In order to understand the real impact of these laws on the UT of Jammu and Kashmir, one needs to dive deeper into the framework of these legislations and the agricultural structure of the UT. It deserves notice that approximately 75% of J&K’s population is associated directly or indirectly with agriculture or allied activities, 65% of the government revenue comes from agriculture activities when in fact only 30% of its area being under cultivation.

Importantly, the Jammu region mostly yields wheat, rice, maize, pulses, fodder, and oilseeds while the valley yields paddy and maize in addition to apples, al­mond, walnut, peach, cherry, and saffron. Broadly, J&K’s agricultural setup can be classified into two sections – one being premium, which includes apples, al­mond, walnut, peach, cherry, and saffron, and the other being essentials consisting wheat, rice, maize, pulses, fodder, and oilseeds.

The impact of farm bills on the premium sector is expected to be progressive as the harvest is sold at premium prices with fewer price fluctuations. The premium category harvest being region-specific and rare provides the farmers with a level playing field in negotiating with private buyers.

Private buyers can always shift the increase in purchase price under this category on the end-user without much fear of the impact on the demand. At the same time, this sector could be a pure delight for contractual farming, as the same would increase the export prospects generating greater profits for farmers and private players.

Traditionally, owners of orchards would travel to Delhi with their products and deal with the bidders through a licensed middleman at APMC. With the new system, it is now anticipated that corporates would reach the orchard owners for contractual farming or harvest purchase, thereby reducing the transportation cost and offering better purchase proposals.

On the other hand, the essentials category is destined to adverse impact, benefitting the corporates largely. Rice and Maize being a dominant crop and no mention of the MSP in the newly introduced Bills coupled with tougher competition from Punjab and Haryana would impact the sale of these crops for the farmers of J&K.

Needless to mention, the location proximity and infrastructure would make it easier for corporates to choose other states over J&K. In view of the foregoing, if the benefit of MSP is not offered to the J&K’s rice and maize farmer, the remuneration of the farmers would be drastically affected impacting the entire economic system of the region.

Another pivotal aspect for essential category farming is assessing contractual farming, which would practically make the farmer or landowner a labourer at his own field. The farmer would be working only to satisfy the contractual obligations and without him knowing the agreement would create proxy ownership of a metro city-based corporate house on his land in the valley.

The simultaneous amendment of the Essential Commodities Act will leave the farmer exploited and prone to unfair negotiations every alternative year. Removing cereals as an essential commodity practically allows the storage of cereals in any quantity and is speculated to be used by corporate houses to regulate prices by hoarding and leaving the farmers without a choice. Hence, farmers would only become more vulnerable.

Another major change that has been bought is ousting the jurisdiction of Civil Courts and resting the powers with the SDM who would appoint a committee for resolving the grievances. Hence, putting independence and neutrality of decisions under a dark cloud.

How does the future look like?

At the cost of repetition, the proposed model has been picked from the USA and European market and as per statistics a short gain followed by stagnation and depression emerged. Bihar Government also tried the model and the statistics are not convincing.

Although as far as farmers are concerned, the best available advice is the formation of better co-operative societies, seeking sound and concrete legal advice before executing contracts, and not bowing down before the corporates.

The new laws may leave a tangible demographic impact on the UT of J&K as the farmer might soon shift from Paddy and Maize farming to alternate yields prospecting better monetary compensation; so in 10 years from now while driving across the highway, you don’t find men and women in ankle-deep water weeding out rice (nendhkaran); just recall what happened 10 years back.


About the authors

The Authors Viqas Malik and Romaan Muneeb are Lawyers at the J&K High Court
and Partners at “Malik and Romaan Law offices, Srinagar”.

Viqas Malik represents clients before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, various High Courts, Special CBI Courts and Trial Courts in matters involving issues pertaining to Criminal Law, Civil Law, Media Law and Cyber Laws. He also regularly advises clients on a broad range of legal issues including those pertaining to Intellectual Property Rights

Romaan Muneeb advises on Corporate and Commercial Matters, Food laws, Labor Laws, Cyber Laws, Business and Real Estate & Property regulations plus he has worked closely with lawyers from the USA, UAE, Malta, Cyprus, & London. He has experience of handling International Arbitration before DIFC-LCIA Arbitration Centers. He has in the past established many business houses to lay their foundation in Kashmir and helped them expand their presence across the state.

The Authors can be reached at [email protected]


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -