Farm Bills and Their Impact on Jammu & Kashmir

Must Read

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...
Malik and Romaan Law Offices
Malik and Romaan Law Offices, Kashmir is a full-service Law Firm with its offices in Delhi, J&K and Mumbai

Follow us

The much talked about monsoon session of the Parliament culminated recently but not without controversies, sloganeering, and demonstrations. Apart from various other bills that saw the light of the day, the three key farm bills namely Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Bill, Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, and Essential Commodities (Amendment) Bill garnered maximum spotlight. Intriguingly, like all other legislations, these bills are very promising, or one may feel that they are being projected that way.

The newly introduced laws are stated to be farmer-friendly by promising to increase his income and freeing the sector from government control. However, it has caused a major commotion across the country with farmers already hitting the streets despite the pandemic. The government, on the other hand, asserts that these bills will revolutionize the agrarian sector, which collectively constitutes 60% of India’s economy and hence the growth of the sector would fundamentally impact the overall economy and vice versa.

The government has maintained that these bills will not abolish the traditional Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), popularly known as the “Mandi”. The farmer will now have a choice to sell his produce directly to APMC, private players, or corporates. However, there are fears that with the envisaged privatization of the agrarian sector, the state-controlled bodies are destined to lose their existence as has been seen in the case of Indian Airlines, Air India, BSNL and so many other PSU’s.

At the same time, the adversaries to these bills have argued that this system has already failed in the state of Bihar while other so-called reforms by the regime like demonetization and GST have done more harm than good. Even in developed economies like the USA, studies show that this capitalist free market system has not worked in favour of the farmers and some level of government control is necessary to maintain the equilibrium. The main reason for the extinction of government-run players from the market has been the unbeatable marketing warfare by corporate houses. However, successive governments have failed to notice the elephant in the room, which gives these corporates the upper hand.

In order to understand the real impact of these laws on the UT of Jammu and Kashmir, one needs to dive deeper into the framework of these legislations and the agricultural structure of the UT. It deserves notice that approximately 75% of J&K’s population is associated directly or indirectly with agriculture or allied activities, 65% of the government revenue comes from agriculture activities when in fact only 30% of its area being under cultivation.

Importantly, the Jammu region mostly yields wheat, rice, maize, pulses, fodder, and oilseeds while the valley yields paddy and maize in addition to apples, al­mond, walnut, peach, cherry, and saffron. Broadly, J&K’s agricultural setup can be classified into two sections – one being premium, which includes apples, al­mond, walnut, peach, cherry, and saffron, and the other being essentials consisting wheat, rice, maize, pulses, fodder, and oilseeds.

The impact of farm bills on the premium sector is expected to be progressive as the harvest is sold at premium prices with fewer price fluctuations. The premium category harvest being region-specific and rare provides the farmers with a level playing field in negotiating with private buyers.

Private buyers can always shift the increase in purchase price under this category on the end-user without much fear of the impact on the demand. At the same time, this sector could be a pure delight for contractual farming, as the same would increase the export prospects generating greater profits for farmers and private players.

Traditionally, owners of orchards would travel to Delhi with their products and deal with the bidders through a licensed middleman at APMC. With the new system, it is now anticipated that corporates would reach the orchard owners for contractual farming or harvest purchase, thereby reducing the transportation cost and offering better purchase proposals.

On the other hand, the essentials category is destined to adverse impact, benefitting the corporates largely. Rice and Maize being a dominant crop and no mention of the MSP in the newly introduced Bills coupled with tougher competition from Punjab and Haryana would impact the sale of these crops for the farmers of J&K.

Needless to mention, the location proximity and infrastructure would make it easier for corporates to choose other states over J&K. In view of the foregoing, if the benefit of MSP is not offered to the J&K’s rice and maize farmer, the remuneration of the farmers would be drastically affected impacting the entire economic system of the region.

Another pivotal aspect for essential category farming is assessing contractual farming, which would practically make the farmer or landowner a labourer at his own field. The farmer would be working only to satisfy the contractual obligations and without him knowing the agreement would create proxy ownership of a metro city-based corporate house on his land in the valley.

The simultaneous amendment of the Essential Commodities Act will leave the farmer exploited and prone to unfair negotiations every alternative year. Removing cereals as an essential commodity practically allows the storage of cereals in any quantity and is speculated to be used by corporate houses to regulate prices by hoarding and leaving the farmers without a choice. Hence, farmers would only become more vulnerable.

Another major change that has been bought is ousting the jurisdiction of Civil Courts and resting the powers with the SDM who would appoint a committee for resolving the grievances. Hence, putting independence and neutrality of decisions under a dark cloud.

How does the future look like?

At the cost of repetition, the proposed model has been picked from the USA and European market and as per statistics a short gain followed by stagnation and depression emerged. Bihar Government also tried the model and the statistics are not convincing.

Although as far as farmers are concerned, the best available advice is the formation of better co-operative societies, seeking sound and concrete legal advice before executing contracts, and not bowing down before the corporates.

The new laws may leave a tangible demographic impact on the UT of J&K as the farmer might soon shift from Paddy and Maize farming to alternate yields prospecting better monetary compensation; so in 10 years from now while driving across the highway, you don’t find men and women in ankle-deep water weeding out rice (nendhkaran); just recall what happened 10 years back.

About the authors

The Authors Viqas Malik and Romaan Muneeb are Lawyers at the J&K High Court
and Partners at “Malik and Romaan Law offices, Srinagar”.

Viqas Malik represents clients before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, various High Courts, Special CBI Courts and Trial Courts in matters involving issues pertaining to Criminal Law, Civil Law, Media Law and Cyber Laws. He also regularly advises clients on a broad range of legal issues including those pertaining to Intellectual Property Rights

Romaan Muneeb advises on Corporate and Commercial Matters, Food laws, Labor Laws, Cyber Laws, Business and Real Estate & Property regulations plus he has worked closely with lawyers from the USA, UAE, Malta, Cyprus, & London. He has experience of handling International Arbitration before DIFC-LCIA Arbitration Centers. He has in the past established many business houses to lay their foundation in Kashmir and helped them expand their presence across the state.

The Authors can be reached at [email protected] is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus. The petition sought to direct...

Gujarat High Court Directs To Register Name of Petitioners in the Society Records as Owners of Property, as per Will

A single-judge bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Justice Biren Vaishnav, because probate wasn’t necessary and that the petitioners were entitled to...

If No Complaint Is Filed, No Further Orders Are Required To Be Passed: Telangana High Court

Excerpt In Matlakunta Sundaramma vs The State Of Telangana, on January 8, 2021, the Telangana High Court decided that there is no requirement of passing...

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -