Escalating tensions between India and Pakistan

Must Read

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

The Debate Between IPR and Competition Law Explained

There are various market processes or structures that govern market scenario. For simplicity, this paper focuses on two mechanisms:...

Follow us

Pakistan: a Terroristan Country; says India

India has branded Pakistan as “Terroristan” in the recent UN General Assembly Meeting. Sushma Swaraj, India’s External Affairs Minister, had called Pakistan “pre-eminent terror export factory”. The contribution of Pakistan to the global terrorism can be said to be unparalleled as told by Eenam Gambhir, India’s first secretary to the UN in the UN General Assembly. The “land of the pure” is changing into “land of the terror”, says a report by BBC. Pakistan’s sponsorship of terrorism can be seen through the uprising of the Hafiz Saeed’s organisation, which is one of the UN designated terrorist organisation, as one of the political parties  in Pakistan. India’s representative stated that Pakistan’s counter-terrorism policy is to provide safe haven for the mainstream terrorists who are part of the global terrorist groups. It was also expressed that all the preventive measures taken by Pakistan do not justify any of their actions. India’s neighbour country must understand that Jammu and Kashmir would remain as the integral part of India, no matter how much Pakistan tried to violate the territorial integrity of India. On the other hand, Pakistan stated that it was not to be blamed for any political situation of Afghanistan. It was not providing any harbour to the Talibans. It also stated that there was a violation of the Geneva Convention in the Jammu and Kashmir by the Indian militants as many people were injured by the firing of the shotgun pellets. The injured civilians were merely protesting against the NDA government functioning in Delhi .Pakistan held India responsible for all the unrest in the Kashmir region. Pakistan requested the United Nations to send a special envoy to India in order to assess the prevailing situation of Kashmir (Indian Express). It was stated that Pakistan would revert back with the matching response towards India.

In response to this, Gambhir stated that Pakistan was diverting all the funds meant for improving the military infrastructure of different countries towards building the largest terrorist nation in the whole world. He stated that it was ironical that the country which gave shelter to terrorists like Osama bin Laden are now playing the role of victim in the current assembly.

But all the above comments are not backed by any kind of stringent action. India always avoids to take actions like halting the trade between both countries or taking off the “Most Favoured Nation” status from Pakistan. If the recent governments are to be taken into consideration, they have shied away from their responsibility. India’s cautious attitude from the beginning is costing very badly to India itself (Hindustan Times). Firstly, India will not take any major action against all the cease-fire violations and secondly, it does not ask any other organisation like United Nations to impose sanctions on Pakistan.

Balochistan Issue

Next coming to the Balochistan issue, though Narendra Modi raised the issue in the speech of Independence Day, 2017, but after that, India has kept quite over the matter. Balochistan is becoming the new East Pakistan due to the atrocities committed by the Pakistan militants. Pakistan is using fake photographs of the killings In Jammu and Kashmir by Indian militants. But India has only responded by branding Pakistan as “terroristan”.  India has issue with the Pakistan Occupied Kashmir. Pakistan is coming up with different kind of projects like building dams etc. in that region. There is no opposition to that by India (TOI Report). Narendra Modi had claimed that blood and water cannot flow together through the Indus. The Permanent Indus River Commission has been suspended long ago. But now the World Bank is trying to act as the mediator between India and Pakistan in order to start the treaty again. There is no action as such from the side of India against this move.

Modi’s surprise visit to Lahore on the issue of cross-border terrorism turned out to be of no use. Immediately after that, there were mass killings by the Pakistan Militants. India tried to take the revenge by operating surgical strike over the opposition’s military pads. Following the same, Pakistan did not learn any lesson and kept on violating the cease-fire.  On 2nd October, 2017, Pakistan violated the cease-fire near the Poonch district of Jammu and Kashmir which led to killing of a 10-year old girl and injuring several civilians (TOI)

A Change in the Attitude Of Indian Leaders- Need of the Hour

It seems that the India-Pakistan fight is of India’s alone. The NDA government asked Rajeev Chandrasekhar to withdraw his private member bill of naming Pakistan as a “terrorist state”. India is not even willing to brand ISI (Pakistan’s Investigation Agency) as an organisation sponsoring the terrorists. India, in furtherance of showing goodwill, allowed ISI to conduct investigation in the Pathankot attacks where ISI was behind the orchestrated attack in Pathankot. India needs to stop retaliating to Pakistan’s actions only by talks.

The time has reached where the Government of India have to retaliate more strongly. When the other country is not learning any lesson from the measures taken by India, it will be better to show a  strict attitude instead of a cautious attitude. Civilians  dying  as a product of the war between India and Pakistan.

Many peace talks have been conducted between both the countries. All of them turning out to be futile as none gave any positive results. India is always at a strategic advantage over Pakistan which it must use for the protection of its  nation.

Even the world public opinion is against India for such callous attitude. So the last thing left for India is to react in a manner popularly coined as “tit for tat”.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -