Branding a Cause: TM Application For ‘Black Lives Matter’ And ‘I Can Breathe’ Falls Flat

Must Read

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

The Debate Between IPR and Competition Law Explained

There are various market processes or structures that govern market scenario. For simplicity, this paper focuses on two mechanisms:...

Follow us

From India’s ‘Simon Go Back’ to Suffragettes’ ‘Votes for Women’ to America’s anti war ‘Not in My Name’, slogans have always held the power to unite. The rallying cry ‘Black Lives Matter’ (BLM) has gained new momentum amidst the protest against systematic racism in American policing. Thousands of people across the globe have taken to the streets to protest the murder of George Floyd by the hands of the police.

In other news, trademark (TM) applications for the terms “BLACK LIVES MATTER” and “I CAN’T BREATHE” have surged. The applicants have faced backlash over the blatant abuse of opportunity and intention to profit off tragedy. 

History of Black Lives Matter (BLM)

In 2013, Alicia Garza, Patrice Cullors and Opal Tomett, were discussing the acquittal of a man who killed Trayvon Martin. Martin was a 17-year old black teenager in Florida. “Our Lives Matter, Black Lives Matter,” Ms. Garza wrote on Facebook. Ms. Cullors replied, “#BlackLivesMatter”. Ms. Tometi joined in and the hashtag spread its digital wings.

From then on, the murder of innocents like Michael Brown, Sandra Bland, Tamir Rice and many more have turned #BlackLivesMatter from a hashtag to a movement. BLM is now an organized movement with a foundation in its name working globally. The organization sells official merchandise, proceeds from which goes to fund the movement. The founders chose not to trademark these powerful phrases that would restrict public use. 

‘I can’t breathe’ became a rallying cry after Eric Garner’s murder in the hands of the police on camera went viral. Like George Floyd, Garner’s last words were ‘I can’t breathe’.

Facts of the Case 

Manchester-based businessperson Georgios Demetriou filed trademark applications “I CAN’T BREATHE” (Application no. 3497640) and “BLACK LIVES MATTER” (Application no. 3497647). He is the founder of bicycle selling business Licence to Thrill Ltd.

In an interview, he claimed that he had submitted the applications to raise money for charity. The proceeds from the charity would go to ‘help people from Manchester and beyond’. He hopes to build relations with ‘big name’ companies who would pay him ‘royalty’ for using the terms. Ironically, Dimitri also said that these trademarks would belong to the people and not to him. 

Public backlash and response of UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO)

Social media had exploded when news of the TM applications broke out. Twitteraties were quick to point out Demetriou’s abject apathy towards the cause. UK TM expert Erik Pelton said attempting to secure exclusive rights to use these phrases is reprehensible and likely to fail. Demetriou claims that he had gotten threat calls, along with his employees.

UKIPO in an unprecedented move responded via a tweet on twitter. It stated that decisions of the IPO are important for both the applicant and the public. They have a responsibility to examine the validity of all applications like these under trademark law. Their decision will not be without recognition of current and historical injustices. It further invited ‘observations’ by the public if the registration process reaches that stage. Ultimately, Demetriou withdrew the TM application citing fear from threat.

Analysis

Since the death of George Floyd, there have been at least 26 TM applications of these terms in USA. In general, efforts to trademark political slogans or campaign slogans are not new. Trayvon Martin’s mother herself moved to trademark ‘I am Trayvon’ and ‘justice for Trayvon’ after he was brutally killed by the police in 2012.

In 2017 Hard Candy, a cosmetic company moved to trademark #metoo after it gained momentum on social media. While Hard Candy withdrew the application facing public backlash, Trayvon’s mark is registered. Trademarks are marks that identify the source of goods and services. Its primary purpose is for consumers avoid to confusion.

Nearly anything can be subject of trademark including color, smell etc. as long as it serves the purpose of identifying source of product. Political slogans can be trademarked as Donald J. Trump successfully registered the phrase ‘Make America Great Again’ in 2015. Trump has used ‘MAGA’ as a brand strategy, selling himself with the slogan during the Presidential run of 2016.

On the other hand, slogans such ‘BLM’, ‘I can’t breathe’, ‘Boston Strong’ etc have become universal and cannot be attributed to one ‘proprietor’. Even the people who have coined the terms/phrases do not own them. Previously, while rejecting these types of applications USPTO said these marks used in rallies, are dedicated to raising awareness of civil rights, protesting violence and conveying the message of support for the same. According to IP expert Lee Curtis, registering these trademarks is contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality. 

Conclusion

There is an economic undertone to trademark. It restricts others from using the mark without the permission of the proprietor. These events prove that opportunistic trademark applications can face extreme backlash. However, as UKIPO rightly said the registry has to consider each application individually keeping in mind its impact on the greater community.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -