Both houses of Parliament Passed new Anti-Corruption Bill To Punish Bribe Givers and Takers

Must Read

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

Follow us

A new anti-corruption Bill was proposed by the BJP government in a move to amend the decade-old 1988 anti-graft law to make it possible to punish both bribe givers as well as bribe takers. After the extensive debate at the Lok Sabha, the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Bill was passed with 43 amendments on Tuesday, July 24, 2018. The Bill had already received Rajya Sabha‘s ascent last week.

The need of the New Bill

The Bill proposes several measures to tackle corruption in our country. During the debate, APJ Reddy (TRS) questioned the effectiveness of the new Bill and observed, “corruption was involved from birth to death as, at every stage of life, one should have to pay the bribe for any work.” But every party members present at the Lok Sabha agreed that rampant corruption has stalled India’s development and progress.

Minister of State, Jitendra Singh, explained his government’s zero tolerance policy towards corruption is reflected in the Bill. Minister Singh said that Prime minister Narendra Modi wants to eradicate corruption from every level of government and hence the new Bill is pushing for enhancing transparency and accountability of the government and stringent laws under the new provisions of the Bill.

Debates over the new Bill

Congress MP, K H Muniyappa voiced his opinion regarding the new Bill stating, “electoral reforms were badly required to check corruption in the system. Corruption can be tackled to some extent if money is not involved in polls right from the panchayat to Parliament.”

Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury also stated that the opposition will support the government if it was serious in tackling corruption “rather than making claims.” Chowdhury alleged, “Under your rule, India, which was known as the land of saints, has turned into a land of semesters…Vijay Mallya, Nirav Modi and many others fled the country after defaulting on banks’ money.”

BJP MP Prahlad Joshi vehemently countered Chowdhury’s allegations and reiterated, “the loans were sanctioned by banks after they were pressurised by the top people in the UPA government.” He also pointed out that the current NDA government is doing their utmost to root out corruption from the country.

TDP member K Nirmala also doubted the government’s sincerity in eliminating corruption and alleged that the “central government was using the anti-corruption laws for their vested political interests. There is a need to effectively implement these laws.” APJ Reddy from the TRS party concurred and voiced his concern, “the new Bill would discourage whistleblowers to come forward.”

CPI-M leader B Khan mentioned about the Sarada scam of West Bengal and stressed government inaction as the moot cause for concern in the case. He also alleged that the West Bengal government is using delay tactics in appointing of the anti-graft ombudsman Lokpal. Idris Ali leader of the TMC led government of West Bengal claimed all allegations are misplaced as “Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee is a symbol of honesty.”

K Geetha from YSRCP party was of the opinion that “excessive regulation, lack of transparency and lack of transparent laws led to corruption,” as she herself was once a victim of such corruption. Pappu Yadav, ex-RJD MP from Bihar stated, “corruption was worse than terrorism.” Yadav also stressed on the fact that “funding of political parties should be made more transparent as it impacted the election process. People including officers and politicians need to be investigated by the Enforcement Directorate and other agencies,” and this should start from him otherwise “cribbing politicians” should resign if they cannot act.

Provisions proposed under the new Bill

  • Enhanced transparency and accountability
  • Bribe-taking and bribe giving are both punishable by laws
  • Prior approval for investigation of all government officers, not just those at Joint Secretary level and above as was the earlier norm, to prevent harassment of honest officers
  • Speedy trial of corruption cases with the verdict being delivered within two years in such cases
  • Immunity from arrest would now be available for all government officers unlike before
  • Bureaucrats will be ensured protection from false and malicious complaints even after their retirements
  • The punishment for bribe takers has been increased to three years minimum imprisonment and can extend up to seven years as well as heavy fine can be imposed on the wrongdoers.

The effectiveness of the new law

India is currently ranked at 100th in World Bank’s – Ease of Doing Business Index 2018 from its 2017 rank of 130th which is a reflection of India’s economic growth and development. MNC’s are showing their interest in deepening business interests in India as corporate giant Samsung has opened a new manufacturing unit in Noida from where they are hoping to increase production to the tune of 120 million in the next three years. Modi government’s Make in India campaign is showing success as new job openings in manufacturing, production, operations, IT, infrastructure and pharmaceuticals are on the rise. GST scheme and demonetisation may have hit India’s growth initially but experts predict annual GDP gains of 8-10% in the years ahead. That would not be far short of China in its boom years.

Corruption in this situation has already become an impediment to India’s growth. Loans written off or considered likely to turn sour are near a fifth of the loan book at state-owned lenders, which have about 70% of market share. The resulting losses have left banks short of capital for fresh loans. In this backdrop, Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Bill is not only a necessity but is a boon for the Indian economy. The Narendra Modi government going into elections in 2019 will also garner much public support and sympathy because of this progressive legislation but it is still best to opt for caution as legislation alone cannot serve the ultimate purpose if it is not implemented diligently and with utmost honesty.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

New Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendments Are Valid Says Supreme Court

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments in the insolvency and bankruptcy code which makes it mandatory for a minimum of 100 or 10% of home buyers of a project to initiate insolvency proceedings against a builder for not delivering flats or commercial shops on time.

[HUL – Sebamed Ad War] Bombay High Court Passed Injunction; Permits Sebamed Ad Against HUL’s Dove

The ad war between the German personal care brand Sebamed and the consumer goods giant Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL) has come to an end. On January 19th, Bombay High Court passed an injunction order permitting the Sebamed ad against Hindustan Unilever’s Dove without any changes. It was observed that Sebamed ads were backed with evidence-based data. However, Sebamed was ordered to put an end to its advertisement that compared HUL soap bars Lux, Pears, and Santoor with Rin and detergent category.

Bombay High Court Says White Collar Crimes Are More Dangerous Than Murder and Dacoity

The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court rejected 4 petitions of 4 businessmen after observing that white-collar crimes are more serious than murder and dacoity. The businesspersons were booked for fraud of evading GST by producing fake invoices.

Right To Protection Can’t Be Granted To Married Woman Involved in Live-in Relationship: Allahabad High Court

The Bench of Allahabad High Court dismissed a petition of a live-in couple, observing that a married woman in a live-in relationship is not entitled to any sort of legal protection whatsoever. The Court remarked that they are adults and should live as ‘husband and wife’ if they want no one to interfere in their lives.

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

[Sushant Singh Rajput Case]: Republic TV & Times Now Hindered Investigation Probe Says Bombay HC

In November last year, the Court had reserved its judgement on the PILs that came from 8 former police officers from Maharashtra, lawyers, activists and NGOs, seeking restraining orders against the media trial in the Sushant Singh Rajput case.

Women Advocates Move To Supreme Court Against the Delhi HC Orders on Resuming Physical Hearing

Another writ petition has been filed by women advocates in the Supreme Court against the decision of the Delhi HC of directing the expansion of physical hearing of cases within the National Capital Territory of Delhi without giving an option to litigants to be represented by their lawyers virtually.

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus. The petition sought to direct...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -