Scrutinizing And Scrapping The Legitimacy Of Article 35A

Must Read

India’s International ‘Retrospective Taxation’ Regime Vis-a-Vis PCA Rulings in Vodafone and Cairn in 2020

The imposition of retrospective taxation of foreign companies doing business in India has been at the helm of controversy...

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Follow us

Article 35A, that grants special rights and privileges to the individuals of Jammu & Kashmir, is confronting a legitimate test in the Apex Court. A discussion over continued the constitutional provisions has picked up in recent months, once many pleas were filed within the Apex Court questioning the validity of Article 35A.

On Transfiguration, the court aforementioned a three-judge bench would decide whether or not the pleas ought to be referred a five-judge Constitution bench for examining the larger issue of alleged violation of the basic structure of the Constitution.

The Kashmir centrical political parties are demanding for shielding Article 35A, that the aforementioned was the sole bridge between Asian nation and J&K. However, the BJP and alternative parties of Jammu region are pressurising for its invalidation.

What Is Article 35A?

Article 35A is an immunity to acts being challenged for violation of the Constitution of the country. The petition filed by Mr Upadhyay has stricken Article 35A stating it infringes namely, Article 14, 15, 16, 19 and 21, as:

  • The disputed provision violates woman ‘right to marry a person according to her choice’, by not giving her heirs any right to property if she marries a man not holding Permanent Resident Certificate (PRC);
  • The mechanical segment, i.e the industrial sector and the private sector is regressive due to ownership restrictions in the state. As non-residents of the state of Jammu & Kashmir are not allowed from purchasing and possessing properties.
  • Students of other states are not granted admission in state engineering, medical and professional universities, violating Article 14 and 15.
  • Not only the Residents of other state are not allowed to take govt, jobs in the concerned state but also no voting rights are given to them.
  • Qualified & Specialised doctors, engineers and teachers refrain from residing in the state.
  • Grave violation of the fundamental rights of the SC and ST residing in the state from prolong period. Dalits & Valmikis, were granted the PRC subject to the condition that they and their future generations would serve as safai-karmacharis (scavengers);

Procedural Downside

It has been observed that Article 35A stricken by following the due process recommended for the amendment of the Constitution under Article 368; Article 370 gives no authoritative or official powers on the President to include or erase any provision of the Constitution of India which comes under the exclusive function of the Parliament. Article 35A was never discussed in the Parliament which implies that the President had avoided the lawmaking body, i.e, the legislature to incorporate this article. This would likewise infer that the power of amendment of the Parliament under Article 368 of the Constitution was abbreviated in its application to J&K.

Question Of Legality

On August 27 date a three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra will consider the question of legality and will check the validity of Article 35A. Ashwini Upadhyay a renowned advocate and BJP leader filed a petition in order to strike down the impugned provision.

Scrutinizing And Scrapping The Legitimacy Of Article 35A
Justice Dipak Misra, Chief Justice of India

The State of J&K was granted a special status by incorporating Article 35A in the Constitution of India through an order of President Rajendra Prasad (1954) on the advice of the Jawaharlal Nehru, the then Prime Minister and his Cabinet. The provision gives the State Legislature complete discretion to determine the ‘permanent residents’ of the state. The special status would grant them special rights and privileges in different sector.

The bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justice A. Khanwilkar had adjourned the crucial hearing on as many as five petitions “to the week commencing from August 27” on the grounds that they pertained to the challenge to a Constitutional scheme and could not be heard as the third judge, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, was not present on that day.

Author’s Perception

If Article 35A is “removed, the BJP will vanish from the state”. “It is a battle for the liberation of our community from the yoke of worst-ever slavery, challenging the constitutional validity of Article 35A in the Supreme Court. “If Article 35A Mr with, the day will not be far when the youth of Jammu will also pick up guns and stones. The BJP is selling dreams and want to sacrifice the interests of Jammu to achieve its goal of 300 plus (seats) in the upcoming parliamentary elections,” A disgruntled BJP leader told PTI.

For more updates on Jammu & Kashmir, keep visiting Libertatem Magazine


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -