An Analysis of Cyber Crimes in India

Must Read

An Analysis of the Supreme Court of India’s Decision in Saurav Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh on Reservation

Reservation is one of the debatable realities of Indian constitution. This system got its roots from the exploitations due...

Explained: The Political Crisis in Nepal

On December 20th, K P Sharma Oli, the Prime Minister of Nepal dissolved the Lower House Parliament of the...

Can the Relatives of the Husband Attract Prosecution in Case of Triple Talaq?

The Supreme Court of India has recently made a judgement. It lays down that the relatives of the husband...

Explained: The Right to be Forgotten in India

Right to Privacy is an essential fundamental right which has been enshrined in the Indian Constitution under Article 21...

How will the New WhatsApp Privacy Policy Affect Us?

On January 4, 2020, the California based tech giant WhatsApp announced its new privacy law. It allows data integration...

India’s International ‘Retrospective Taxation’ Regime Vis-a-Vis PCA Rulings in Vodafone and Cairn in 2020

The imposition of retrospective taxation of foreign companies doing business in India has been at the helm of controversy...

Follow us

The term “Cyber Crime” is not defined in Indian law. We can attribute this to the variety and capricious nature of these offences. Cyber Crimes have challenged the obsolete codes in India, most exactly the Indian Penal Code (IPC) of 186 0. India, after a rise in cyber crimes, enacted the Information Technology Act (IT) of 2000. This act regulates, governs, and penalizes cyber offences. These two laws have been the bulwark of the Indian firewall against cybercrimes. Few provisions in these Acts are the same, and thus they run parallel. A recent statistic shows that Indians are targeted around 4000 times a day by cyberpunks during the lockdown period. This alone suffices the gravity of such attacks. Despite this, the Indian awareness about cybercrimes, their forms, and redressal mechanisms are minimal. In this article, the author attempts to aware of the citizenry of one of the most immediate threats of today.

Cyber Crimes under IPC and IT Act

The Indian Penal Code is a substantive law that applies to criminal offences in India. IT Act, as told earlier, is a bit more concerned about the cyber world. We would not read the provisions of both these acts in isolation. They together form a blend of comprehensive understanding. So, we are here having a parallel discussion on some of the general cyber offences that we all encounter in our day-to-day lives.

Hacking: Section 66 of the IT Act deals with hacking. It defines hacking as the “alteration of information residing in a computer source”. There must be an intention to commit hacking in the absence of which liability under section 66 will not lie. It prescribes imprisonment up to three years and a fine up to ten lakhs for hacking. Section 378 of the IPC deals with the theft of “movable property”. As data is movable, the same provisions apply to data theft. This prescribes a punishment of up to two years or a fine or both.

Cyber Stalking: One facet of online harassment is denigration which includes the posting of photos, texts, or any information by the perpetrator in cyberspace accessible to the third person. In this manner, Cyberbullying and Cyber-harassment are interchangeable. Cyberstalking is a kind of cyber harassment. Cyber harassment could say to be ‘the main motive behind cyberstalking’. IT Act is silent on this issue. Even the IPC doesn’t say much about online stalking. But sections 503- 507 of IPC can also cover cyberstalking. Still, India is in dire need of a law to prevent and penalize cyber harassment.

Online Fraud: According to government records, frauds alone constitute one-third of all the cyber crimes in the country. Online frauds could be in many forms like financial frauds, buyer collusion, etc.

This is also not defined under the IT Act, and we resort to IPC and the Indian Contract Act. IPC punishes fraud if committed with fraudulent intention but not otherwise. Cheating is also punishable under IPC.

Besides all these prevalent cyber offences, there are many other crimes addressed by a combination of laws in India. These include pornography, internet gambling, and security-related crimes, among others.

How to Register an FIR in Cyber Crimes?

Recently, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has directed the states to register more First Information Reports (FIRs) for cybercrimes. As only 2.5 percent of complaints have ever been registered as FIRs, it is an immediate need for police to show vigilance in this regard.

While the Indian legal attitude towards cybercrimes is not comprehensive, the complaint filing mechanism is a bit simple. Though we would discuss the FIR registration, other modes of filing the complaint are also discussed. According to the IT Act, cybercrime is a globally categorized crime, and that’s why a complaint can be registered throughout the country. Every major city in India has a cyber cell which could be accessed through its online portal. This portal asks for name, contact details, and address for mailing. You, as a complainant, would address your complaint to the head of such a cyber cell. There are various remedies available depending upon the nature of the crime.

An FIR of cybercrimes can be registered in any local police station in India. One can also approach the superintendent of police or judicial magistrate for relief if local police do not register FIR. Police must register FIR. Indian law regards major offences against women and children (like cyberstalking, child pornography) as “cognizable”. The police in cognizable offences can arrest without a warrant.

The MHA has launched a centralized “Cyber Crime Reporting Portal” that can be accessed on mobile phones, and victims can easily complain. The portal asks for fundamental details about the incident and also inquires about the suspect. This is the easiest and most suitable forum for filing a complaint. The government is wary of the threats of cybercrimes and urged states to open more cyber cells.


India has more than forty percent population that accesses the internet. Every ten minutes, a cybercrime is reported in India; women and children being the most targeted. Despite this, the registration of the cyber complaint in India is at a record low. This can, to a great extent, be regarded as the ignorance of Indians to these offences. Laws, although competent, are often prone to misuse by authorities. Section 67, the IT Act has been grossly misused for curtailing political speech and censorship. Often, local police do not consider the online harassment to be a crime, don’t know what to do with the evidence or to whom they should escalate the report, or don’t think they can do anything about “virtual” harassment.

At last, the author likes to provide some suggestions for the prevention of cyber offences:

  • One on the internet should be cautious when making “friends” and should avoid interacting with strangers and sharing personal information. Everyone should choose a gender-neutral username, or the e-mail ids should be a combination of characters and phrases that are meaningless.
  • Parents should keep a check on the online activities of children. Schools and workplaces should start counselling programs and peer-to-peer interaction sessions. Cyberstalking should also be dealt with in the same way with full confidentiality.
  • Softwares like Netnanny, Accountable2You restrict certain adulterated websites and give parents access to regulate it.
  • One should not share information related to bank accounts, recent transactions, or any financial history on the internet. Even if a person claims himself to be an official, such information should not be disclosed as RBI’s guidelines prohibit such disclosure. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

“Dismissal Without Inquiry Is Justified if Employee Did Not Prove Minimum Working Period”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the dispute relating to the termination of an employee without any disciplinary inquiry. Brief facts of the case The Respondent, Smt. Sureshwati was...

“Rape Victim To Be Provided Shelter Due To Media Attention Prohibited Under Section 228A of the IPC”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the petition by a rape victim for rehabilitation as she was social ostracization.  Brief facts of the case In this case, a writ...

Benefit of Probation Not Excluded by the Provisions of Mandatory Minimum Sentence Under Section 397 of Ipc

This case concerns the dispute regarding the granting of probation on good conduct to the accused under the age of twenty-one years.   Brief facts of...

Supreme Court Asks for the Centre’s Response on PIL Filed Seeking the Formation of a Media Tribunal

The Supreme Court sought responses from the Press Council of India (PCI), News Broadcasters Association (NBA) on a PIL which sought to set up a media tribunal to tackle issues concerning the media like complaints against media, channels, and networks. Media has become like an unruly horse that has to be tamed to express the plea.

Law Student Asked the Supreme Court To Take Suo Moto Cognizance of the Violent Farmer Protests

A law student of Mumbai University, Ashish Rai has asked the Supreme Court to take Suo Moto Cognizance of the insult to the national flag done by the farmer protests at the Red Fort. In the course of the farmer's tractor rally on Tuesday, some of the protesters unfurled their own flags by entering the premises of the Red Fort.

Farmers Meeting With the Supreme Court Committee Postponed To Jan 29 Due To the Traffic Restrictions

Due to the traffic restrictions after the violent protests broke out on Republic Day, the meeting of farmers with the Supreme Court Committee that was supposed to take place today was postponed to 29th January.

Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Judgment which said Groping without Skin Contact Not Sexual Assault under POCSO

The National Commission for Women (NCW) has challenged the Bombay High Court judgment where it stated that groping a child’s breasts without any ‘skin-to-skin’ contact will not be considered as sexual assault as defined under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Supreme Court Classifying Employees Based on Educational Qualifications for Promotion or Appointment Is Neither Violative of Article 14 nor of Article 16

This case concerns the dispute relating to the classification of employees belonging to the homogenous group based on educational qualifications. Brief facts of the case The...

Supreme Court Refuses To Transfer Petitions To Itself Related To ‘Love Jihad’ Filed in Allahabad High Court

On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to entertain the plea which was filed by the UP Government regarding the transfer of all the pleas challenging the ordinance the court passed, from Allahabad High Court to the Supreme Court.

Bombay HC Nagpur Bench Holds That Groping a Girl Without ‘Skin To Skin’ Contact Is Not Sexual Assault

The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court acquitted a man charged under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and convicted him of a minor offence under IPC stating that there was no direct physical contact.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -