Aftermath Of A Financial Irregularity: Peek Into the Punjab And Maharashtra Co-operative Bank Crisis

Must Read

Ed-Tech Companies and the Consumer Protection Act

In the present time when the whole country is getting back to normal after the wrath of the Coronavirus,...

The Right to Information and its Working of 15 years

On 12th October 2020, RTI finished fifteen years since its commencement. The question remains whether the legislation stands up to...

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

Follow us

On 23 September 2019, the Reserve Bank of India imposed regulations on Punjab and Maharashtra Cooperative (PMC) Bank. This was for the duration of six months due to some alleged financial irregularities. This was followed by an FIR (First Information Report) against the PMC filed by the Mumbai Police. This Article gives a peak on the matter, the action taken after it and the changes made in the Indian banking law.

What is the PMC Bank?

The Punjab and Maharashtra Co-operative Bank is a multi-state scheduled urban co-operative bank. They operate in Delhi, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Goa, Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh. It was established in Sion, Mumbai in 1984. It received ‘scheduled status’ from the RBI in 2000, becoming the youngest one to do so.

What is HDIL?

Housing and Development India Limited is one of India’s largest real estate companies. It operates in the Greater Mumbai Metropolitan area. It was established in 1996 in Mumbai.

Action taken against PMC 

On September 24, 2019, the RBI limited bank activities for PMC. It restricted the withdrawal amount for PMC customers to 1,000 rupees per customer. Later it was 25,000 rupees per customer for six months.

On September 30, 2019, an FIR was filed against the PMC with the Bhandup Police. This was on the instruction of the RBI-appointed Bhandup branch manager of the PMC, Jasbir Singh Mattha. The case was transferred to the Economic Offences Wing (EOW). It had financial irregularities amounting to more than 4,335 crore rupees. PMC allegedly allowed unlawful loans to Housing Development India Limited (HDIL). This was from 2008 to August 2019 without informing the former board members. Despite there being defaults on the repayments for these loans, they were not classified as non-performing assets (NPA’s).

PMC submitted dummy records instead of the stressed accounts of the group during an RBI inspection in 2017. They were booked under the sections 120B (criminal conspiracy), 406 (criminal breach of trust), 409 (criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by banker, merchant or agent), 420 (cheating), 465 (forgery), and 468 (forgery for purpose of cheating).

In March 2020, the RBI extended the curb on PMC for three more months till June 22. Under the restrictions, the bank was forbidden from renewing or granting loans. It was also not allowed to make investments without prior permission of the RBI.

In June 2020, the regulation was extended till December 22, 2020. The withdrawal limit was raised to 1 lakh rupees per customer.

Action taken against HDIL

In December 2019, a PIL filed by advocate Sarosh Damania against HDIL in the Bombay High Court was heard by a division bench consisting of Justices Ranjit More and S P Tavade. They ordered Rakesh and Sarand Wadhawan, directors of HDIL, to repay the loan borrowed from PMC Bank in the interest of the lender and its depositors. They also ordered the sale of HDIL assets in the interest of PMC and its depositors.

In January 2020, the Bombay High Court set up a three-member panel chaired by former SC judge S Radhakrishnan for the sale of HDIL assets to recover the dues owed to PMC. They were ordered to give a progress report by April 30, during the next hearing of the case.

In February 2020, the Supreme Court stayed the Bombay High Court order for sale of HDIL assets for repayment of dues to PMC. The RBI appealed against the HC order, which the SC took notice of.

Common people suffering due to bank scam

Mulund in Mumbai has about 15,000 account holders in PMC bank, who all suffered due to the restrictions in money withdrawal. There are reports of a suicide attempt and eleven people dying due to various medical problems since the news was released. A woman with 1 crore rupees in the bank committed suicide. People started taking to the roads to protest against this restriction. In this process too, two senior citizens fainted during a protest outside the RBI headquarters in Mumbai. Moreover, around 15 people were arrested in front of RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das’ house.

 Amending the Banking Regulation Act

The Banking Regulation (Amendment) Bill, 2020 was moved in the Lok Sabha by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on February 26. This bill strengthens cooperative banks by increasing professionalism, enabling access to capital, improving governance, and oversight for sound banking through the RBISitharaman stated this in her 2020 budget speech.    

Announcement of new ordinance 

On June 24, 2020, the Union Cabinet held a meeting. They decided on approving an ordinance. It was to bring all the, 540 multi-state, and urban co-operative banks under the control of the RBI. Information and Broadcasting Minister Javadekar said that depositors will get more security. These banks are currently under the control of the Registrar of Cooperative Societies and the RBI. This decision was partly made due to the PMC-HDIL crisis that India faced last year.   

So, what now?

The state that PMC is in right now is a cautionary tale for the banking sector and banking law in India. The RBI is reacting to the crisis, but it is late in doing so. RBI has made the situation quite difficult for the painful. This is due to the imposition of heavy restrictions on depositors of the PMC. Whoever was lured in with the high deposit rates of the bank is now facing a tough time. The business model has high deposit rates. It lends money to debtors with questionable credentials at low rates. And hence is a flawed method. This needs to change. Reforming governance is one of the steps essential to rooting out the problem, that the Union cabinet is doing right now. This situation in general calls for economic reform in the entire banking sector. A stricter regulatory control should be there. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Plea Seeking Dream 11 to Be Declared as Betting Platform Dismissed by Rajasthan High Court

Rajasthan HC dismissed a plea that alleged Dream 11 to be a betting platform, on the assertion that the game depends on skill &...

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped her in a dressing room,...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on behalf of all the minority...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the National Commission for Women. The...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Germany had violated the...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -