24% Newly Elected Rajya Sabha Member Are Facing Criminal Charges 

Must Read

India’s International ‘Retrospective Taxation’ Regime Vis-a-Vis PCA Rulings in Vodafone and Cairn in 2020

The imposition of retrospective taxation of foreign companies doing business in India has been at the helm of controversy...

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Follow us

The election commission of India held elections on 19 seats in June 2020. Its results took the total per cent of members of Rajya Sabha facing criminal charges to 24%.

In the year 2020, terms of 73 members of the Rajya Sabha were going to end. Fifty-five members were going to retire in April. Due to which election commission had selected March 26th as the date of the election. Thirty-seven members were already elected without any contest. On March 11th 2020 World health organization declared COVID 19 as a pandemic. This led to the postponement of elections. New dates for the elections were June 19th, 2020. This time the elections were for 19 seats. Bharatiya Janata Party and its allies won 10 out of 19 seats. This took them closer to the majority number. After the result came, there was an increase in the number of M.P.s with criminal charges in Rajya Sabha. Now there are around 24% of M.P.s with criminal charges against them.

National Election Watch Report 

A few days ago, National Election Watch released a report. This report dealt with the analysis of the Criminal Background of sitting M.P.s of Rajya Sabha. It was this report which gave astonishing revelations. As per these reports, around 24 per cent of the Rajya Sabha M.P.s have a criminal case against them. Around 12 per cent (28 M.P.s) of the total M.P.s of the Rajya Sabha have serious criminal cases against them. Bhonsle Shrimant Chh. Udayanraje Pratap Singh Maharaj is a BJP Rajya Sabha M.P.s. Against whom there is a charge of murder (IPC Section 302). Four members of Rajya Sabha have declared cases related to the attempt of murder (section 307, IPC). 4 members of Rajya Sabha are facing charges related to crimes against women. Out of these 4, K.C. Venugopal is the only one who has declared a case related to rape (section 376, Indian Penal Code).   

BJP has the highest number of such members among all the national parties. Out of the 77 Rajya Sabha M.P.s, 14 of their members face criminal charges. The Indian National Congress has 8 out of 40 members who face criminal charges. INC has the highest per cent of M.P.s. When we check the state parties, conditions are the same in their case also. The All India Trinamool Congress has a total of 13 M.P.s in Rajya Sabha. Out of them, 2(15%) have criminal charges against them. 3 out of 9 Rajya Sabha M.P.s of the Biju Janata Dal have criminal charges against them. 3 out of 6 of the YSRCP Rajya Sabha M.P.s have criminal charges against them. Out of the 8, M.P.s that Samajwadi Party has in the Rajya Sabha 2 have criminal cases against them.

Let us take a look at the M.P.s facing serious criminal charges. 5 of the 77 M.P.s of Bhartiya Janta Party face serious criminal charges. The India National Congress has 40 M.P.s in Rajya Sabha. Out of them, 6 face serious criminal charges. At the same time, state parties like AITC have 1 out of their 13 M.P.s who have serious criminal cases against them. In the case of BJD, 1 out of their 9 M.P.s has serious cases against them. 3 out of 6 and 3 out of 5 are the numbers of M.P.s from YSRCP and RJD which have serious criminal charges against them.

Why Is It A Problem?

These stats show that one-fourth of the M.P.s have criminal cases against them. Stats are worse when we study Lok Sabha. Fifty per cent of the M.P.s in the Lok Sabha have criminal cases against them. All this is very scary for any democracy. Our constitution makers were also worried about the same. They worried about the type of legislators who will sit in parliament after them. They worried about the choices which citizens will have in elections in the future. Dr Ambedkar, (chairman, drafting committee) once gave a speech regarding people and the Constitution. He said that the working of every Constitution depends on one the person who is governing it.

Rajendra Prasad once said that it doesn’t matter if a country provides a constitution or not. The future of the country depends on the people who govern it. Who was the ex-Chief Justice of India? He showed concern about the influx of increasing criminals in politics. His views were that such an event would disrupt the constitutional ethos even though the court agreed with the petitioners. They did not make any law on it. Another irony is that our laws prohibit people from voting. But our laws allow the under trials to contest elections.  

Reaction of Judiciary 

A judgment of Patna High Court banned the undertrial from fighting an election. This judgment is from 2004. The Supreme Court upheld this judgment in 2013. But they overturned this judgment in 2018. CJI said that this was beyond the power of the judiciary due to the separation of powers. They would violate this principle if they made this law. Though, even the CJI said that there is a void in the law about this topic. It is going to be a big problem if we don’t find a solution to the increase in criminal charges in politics. Innocent until proven guilty is what governs the criminal law in India. It is a principle which is basic to the criminal law.   

This gives rise to an argument. Will it be fair to stop someone from fighting an election if there is a presumption of innocence? And it is correct to a level. But one must not forget that if winning an election takes these people to powerful positions. And this increases the chances of biased investigation. There have been many such examples when charges were /dropped. Different people cite different reasons for such things. But one thing which stays common is that the accused has won the election. One of the most recent examples was in 2017. Yogi Adityanath became the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh in 2017. After he started his term, police closed cases against him. Uttar Pradesh police closed a total of 20,000 cases. These cases were against CM Yogi Adityanath and his party members.

What Needs To Be Done?

There are different possible ways to tackle this problem. But one of the best is to stop the big parties from nominating a person facing criminal charges. Our country is in a grave situation. We need stronger laws to tackle this problem. The law which stops the issue of a symbol of a party in case the person has serious criminal charges against them. But we must remember, to not let the people exploit such laws. Because then, fake cases would act as a weapon. A weapon to stop the opposition from contesting elections.

Clear guidelines for checking the history and development in the case. The Election Commission should do a thorough check on the criminal charges a person faces. Then only a decision on ban should happen even though we have laws that make it compulsory to declare the cases registered against one. But we have seen that it all has not been much effective. It’s time for the Indian judiciary or the legislative to take the initiative. India needs to stop criminals from entering the place which controls the country.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -