Libertatem Magazine

Search Results for: Kerala High Court

The Scope of Interference in Revenue Matters by the Court Is Limited and Relief Can Be Granted Only if Statutory Violations Are Established: Kerala High Court

A petition was filed for issuing a writ of certiorarified Mandamus for calling of the records of the 4th respondent in the proceedings dated 03.06.2021. It was prayed to quash the proceedings till date, the license fee for the complete lockdown period to COVID-19 pandemic, and direct the respondents to grant a waiver of the license fee from: 

1.)24.03.2020 to 06.09.2020 

2.)20.02.2021 to the date when the transport services resume and replace, revise and re-fix the license fee in a manner proportionate with the time permitted for vehicle movement from 07.09.2020 in respect of the two-wheeler parking facility at Nachimuthu Maternity Hospital, Pollachi Municipality.  

Read Article »

The Development Authority Must Consider the Objection Raised and Pass Orders on Merit as Expeditiously as Possible: Kerala High Court

A petition was filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution for issuing a writ of Mandamus for calling of records relating to the order dated 30.01.2017 passed by the 2nd Respondent. It was prayed to quash the same and to consequently forbear 3rd Respondent from interfering with the Petitioner’s right in the property. 

Read Article »

Kerala High Court Quashes the Order of Tahsildar and Directs To Follow the Directions of the Revenue Divisional Officer.

A petition was filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution for issuing a writ of Mandamus for calling of records relating to the order dated 30.01.2017 passed by the 2nd Respondent. It was prayed to quash the same and to consequently forbear 3rd Respondent from interfering with the Petitioner’s right in the property. 

Read Article »

Rejection of Proposal for Appointment Based on Vice-Chancellor’s Dissent Is Unsustainable: Kerala High Court

A petition was filed challenging the Exhibit issued stating that the proposal for approval of the Petitioner’s appointment was being returned since the Petitioner was unqualified for appointment to the post when the vacancy was notified. Hence, her appointment was inconsistent with the UGC Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and other Measures for the Maintenance of Standards of Higher Education Regulations, 2010. 

Read Article »