Supreme Court: “Not to Arrest” or “No Coercive Steps” Orders Should Not Be Passed by High Courts
Case Name: M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra [CrA 330 0f 2021] Excerpt In a judgement on Tuesday (April 13, 2021), the
Home » Archives for April 13, 2021
Case Name: M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra [CrA 330 0f 2021] Excerpt In a judgement on Tuesday (April 13, 2021), the
Case: Dr Deb Narayan Samanta vs State of West Bengal & Ors. [WP.ST 128 of 2018] Excerpt The Calcutta High Court on 13th April confirmed
Excerpt The High Court of Jharkhand sustained the decision of Sessions Court and held the Accused guilty after closely examining the Evidence under section 498a
Introduction On or about May 21, 1996, the applicant applied Section 33C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the ID
Excerpt The single bench of Justice BR Sarangi gave the verdict in W.P.(C) NO. 34606 of 2020. The court ordered antedation of regularisation of contractual
Excerpt A Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. It was against the Judgment and the decree dated
Excerpt The Chief Information Commissioner Y.K Sinha stated that since both parties are the same in both cases, the cases have been combined together for
The war between two retail giants Amazon and Reliance in 2020 was out in the open putting India’s retail market worth Rs. 42 lakh Crore at stake.
INTRODUCTION The division bench of Justice N. Kotiswar Singh and Justice Manish Choudhury, of the Gauhati High Court, pronounced the verdict in WP(C)/1818/2019. The court
Excerpt Vijaya, the petitioner filed a petition before the Madras High Court against the sub-registrar office of Chennai, the respondent seeking to register and release
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.