In the petition in which Sister Lucy had argued her case as party-in-person and had challenged her eviction from her convent, the Kerala High Court held that it would not look into her right to continue in the convent. Additionally, the Court stated that police protection can only be provided outside the convent.
After petitions were filed by aggrieved students and the Kerala Students Union challenging the decision of the Government in changing its policy regarding grant of grace marks and deciding that grace marks would not be awarded to SSLC and Plus two students, the Kerala High Court sought a reply from the State Government regarding its grace marks policy.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that it will not cancel the bail of the 12 accused in Kerala gold smuggling case. However, the Court stated that it would examine the applicability of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 in the gold smuggling case.
The High Court issued directions to State Government to frame a policy to regulate crowdfunding to prevent the misuse of the funds being collected.
Excerpt In this case, an appeal was filed by the State of Kerala against a judgment of the Kerala High Court. This appeal was on
The Kerala High Court, while passing an interim order, pertaining to overcrowding at liquor shops stated that ‘Health is more important than revenue.’
A student was denied Science Stream by the school authorities by stating that her score in Maths was low even though the stream chosen by her did not include Maths in it. The Kerala High Court has directed CBSE to provide information on the same and has listed the matter for another day.
The parties in a live-in relationship or non-formal relationship who have lived together for an extended period of time could be brought within the purview of law relating to maintenance and domestic violence and could be considered as husband and wife for the said limited purpose. However, parties to such a relationship cannot be elevated to marital status.
Introduction:- India is a country that has incorporated the characteristics of both, a unitary form of governance and federal form of governance. Its unitary feature
This Petition was filed under section 482 of CrPC against an order which affirmed a decision passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Mahila Court directing the Petitioner to pay a sum of “Sixteen thousand five hundred” Indian Rupees as interim maintenance to the Respondent (his wife) under Section 23 of Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act,2005 (hereinafter “DV” Act).
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
