Parley with Hon’ble Justice Ravi R. Tripathi, Gujarat High Court

Must Read

Interview with Rajiv Tuli, Managing Partner of LegalLands and Vaidat Legale Services

Rajiv Tuli is the Managing Partner of LegalLands and Vaidat Legale Services. Prior to this, he was the managing...

Interview with Ankur Sood, Advocate, Supreme Court of India

Ankur Sood is an Independent Advocate dealing with both Civil as well as Criminal Cases before various Courts and...

Interview with Akash Dalvi, Founder & Managing Attorney at Dalvi Law Firm

Akash Dalvi is a law graduate from ILS Law College and has done his masters from Ajeenkya D.Y. Patil...

Interview with Ashish Anshu, Partner at Tatva Legal, Hyderabad

Mr. Ashish Anshu is a Partner at Tatva Legal, Hyderabad. He has been part of the legal profession for...

Interview with Pankaj Mehta, Founder and Managing Partner of Fortune Legal Advocates and Legal Consultants

Pankaj Mehta is the Founder and Managing Partner of Fortune Legal Advocates and Legal Consultants, Heading a full-service law...

Interview with Rajeev Rambhatla, Head of Hyderabad Office of King Stubb & Kasiva Advocates & Attorneys

Rajeev Rambhatla is the Head of Hyderabad Office of King Stubb & Kasiva Advocates & Attorneys, commonly known as...

Follow us

Libertatem Magazine’s media division had the opportunity of interviewing Hon’ble Justice Mr. Ravi R. Tripathi, Judge, High Court of Gujarat. Justice Tripathi is well regarded in the legal fraternity for his vociferous judgments. In the recent case of Adam B. Chaki v. Government of India, regarding the constitutionality of a scheme proposed by the Central Government to provide scholarship to religious minorities, Justice Tripathi in a powerful dissenting opinion stated that the distinction was solely based on religion and was therefore unreasonable. He stated,

“If it can be shown that the criterion adopted for determining backwardness is useless as a test of backwardness, so that the preference given to them virtually amounts to a preference on the ground of religion alone, the description as backward will be illusory or fictitious.”

Justice Tripathi’s erudite and well-reasoned dissent is a sheer delight to read. He is currently heading the division bench hearing of the appeal in the Naroda Patiya case.

Here’s what Justice Tripathi has to say about how to become a good lawyer and the virtues he wants to see in the future generation lawyers.

“I would repeat what Justice Dave used to say on how to be a good advocate. I believe one should be a good human being first and then one will automatically become a good lawyer without having to put in any extra effort.

I personally feel that the students must have more values, particularly honesty and integrity since this is one profession where there are slippery grounds. Especially in the best years of a person’s career, it is very easy to slip off this path of honesty and integrity. I will advise you to imbibe these two values of life: honesty and integrity and the rest of the things will take care of themselves.”

When we asked Justice Tripathi about any quality that the bar lacks, Your Lordship replied, “This question is perennially asked to the judges about the bar and the bar about the judges. And the answers are often found to be conflicting.”(Laughs)

Recalling an interesting anecdote, Justice Tripathi said, “Once a party was appearing in person. The judge asked him why he did not get a lawyer to defend himself when any lawyer would have done the job for 25 paise (in his time). The fellow went to the bar and said that the judge has said that any lawyer will be available for 25 paisa. The lawyer replied, all those lawyers who were available for 25 paisa have now become judges and so no lawyer is available for 25 paisa.”(Laughs)

He added, “Probably this is my personal perception, but I feel that sincerity is lacking (in the bar). I have no hesitation in telling you that I come across many cases where the lawyers are without papers. Forget about the reading the document, they do not even have the physical possession of the papers. If they have the possession of the papers, they are not read. If they are read I’m sure they will be able to make out a case, but if they are not read, it is very difficult for them to make out a case. Then they accuse the judge that they are very strict and are not giving the orders. Sincerity is one most important thing that the bar must have. And as is very rightly said, you start loving your work and the work will automatically get you success.”

Latest News

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -