The Trump Administration to the U.S. Supreme Court: “End Obamacare”

Must Read

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and...

Follow us

What looks like a move to wipe out the remnants of the Obama’s regime, Donald Trump has called for the elimination of Obamacare. 

What is Obamacare? 

Obamacare is a landmark law formally known as the Affordable Care Act (ACA). It had insured the health of tens of millions of Americans under Barack Obama’s regime. Under the scheme, it’s mandatory for the Americans to buy health insurance. This is unless they want to face a tax penalty. But in 2017, people who failed to subscribe were exempted from paying the fine. It was called the individual mandate. A symbolic part of the policy by the former U.S. President was chalked out.

The Fate of Obamacare 

On June 25, the Donald Trump’s administration asked the U.S Supreme Court to nullify Obamacare. The Republican-led U.S Congress had rendered the act invalid after hewing parts of it. This is the third blow to this law, at the hands of the U.S President. 

The challenge comes amidst the pitiful state of affairs in the country. Some of the highest COVID-19 infections have plagued the U.S., ever since the contagion hit it. The Trump administration had insinuated earlier about its intentions. Since his 2016 campaign, Trump had been promising to supersede the scheme, bringing in a new plan. A significant political battle seems imminent in this year’s presidential election.

The Department of Justice (DoJ) contends, “the individual mandate is not severable from the rest of the Act.” The mandate is unconstitutional following the Congress’s eradication of the fine for non-compliance. Further, the DoJ in a late filing said that the Act should be annihilated.

The Following Backlash

Nancy Pelosi, the Democrat House Speaker has castigated the move. Condemning the current administration, she labelled it as “an act of unfathomable cruelty”. Especially in the middle of the global pandemic. 

The illegalization of the Act will devoid almost 130 million Americans of the protection. Moreover, a population of 23 million could be left uninsured. Calling the act “disastrous”, Pelosi said that it had no legal or moral foundation. America is being ripped off of its healthcare, she claimed. 

Joe Bidden, the democratic presidential candidate also called Trump’s efforts “cruel” and “callous”. The graph of the Coronavirus never saw a flattening curve ever since it hit its peak in the country. Overturning the law will be like abandoning the citizens.

The Hearing 

The U.S Supreme Court has listed the case for its next term, in the beginning of October. Yet, as per the U.S. media, it will not be until the presidential election in November before which the case is assessed.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala gave...

UAPA Cannot Be Used When the Accused Does Not Have an Active Knowledge of the Offence: Delhi High Court

Justice Suresh Kumar Kait held that the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act cannot be charged on the accused when he does not have any knowledge...

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -