Supreme Court: There Is No Merit in Charging Interest on Interest for Deferred Payments During the Moratorium Period

Must Read

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India &...

Follow us

The SC said that there is no merit in charging interest on interest for deferred loan payment instalments during the moratorium period. A bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan along with Justices Sanjay Kaul and M.R. Shah presided asked the Centre and RBI to review the issue.

Facts of the Case

The bench, comprising Justices Sanjay Kaul and M R Shah was hearing a plea. It was filed by Gajendra Sharma against the levy of interest on loan repayments deferred availing the six-month moratorium. The Reserve Bank of India allowed it. The main issue in the plea was that banks should not charge interest during the moratorium period. They should at least refrain from charging interest or interest. 

The petitions challenged the RBI Circulars of March 27, 2020, and May 22, 2020. These allowed financial institutions to levy interest on loans during the six-month moratorium.

Arguments by the Petitioner

The petitioner sought direction from the Court to declare the part of RBI’s March 27, 2020 notification as ultra-vires. That is to the extent of charging interest on the loan during the moratorium. The petitioner said that this is an obstruction in right to life guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution.

Senior Advocate Rajiv Datta represented the petitioner. He said that he was ‘obliged’ to the court for understanding the troubles of petitioners. Further, he said, “No country shall charge compound interest. Yes, some sectors are doing better. Today cycles are selling heavily. That’s not the point. I only want the moratorium period interest on interest waiver. We are a humble citizenry. 90 percent of Indians have opted for deferment”.

He added, “Today the RBI wants to make money out of banks? In this serious situation? What about those who have taken huge sums of money from banks and have fled the country?”

Arguments by the Respondent

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta submitted from the respondents’ side before the Court. It is not easy for the banks to waive off interest since banks have to pay interest to its depositors. A plea of waiver of interest during the moratorium period will affect the financial stability of the bank and also put the interests of the depositors in jeopardy. He added, “Moratorium effectively means deferment.” Senior Advocate Harish Salve appears for Indian Banks Association. He submitted that banks are looking at financial liabilities that might arise after the pandemic ends, moratorium ends. He said that the issues need to be tackled in a sectorial way. The court will consider the various payments of deferrals on a case to case and sector to sector basis.

Salve said, “According to authoritative estimates, the world will see a meltdown by 2022, not charging interest during this period will put the entire banking sector under a lot of distress.”

Senior Advocate Mukul Rohtagi said, that there Is No Merit in “Charging Interest on Interest” for Deferred Payments During the Moratorium Period. He appeared for State Bank of India. He submitted that the banks’ obligations to the depositors are in force even during a pandemic.

Rohtagi said, “The benefit of deferment has to come with a cost and it cannot be availed and not come at a cost. 90% of borrowers have not even sought a moratorium because they know it is not free.

Court’s Observation

The bench observed that it cannot treat times of pandemic as normal circumstances.

The bench orally observed, “Once the moratorium is fixed then it should serve the desired purposes and we see no merit in charging interest on interest.”  The judges also opined that once the moratorium is fixed then the desired purpose should be served and the government should interfere in the matter as it cannot be completely left to banks.

Justice M R Shah remarked, “Once you allow moratorium, you have to see the same is availed. That’s why people are not availing it.”

Court’s Decision

The bench pointed out that the banks will classify accounts as Non-Performing Assets if borrowers do not give interest on interest. The bench added that it understood the concerns of the banks and are only talking about waiver of interest on interest.

Justice Kaul said, “We are aware of all these concerns and we are talking only about interest in interest. For these three months, you have deferred but then you have not done away with interest on interest.

The Court also stated that the Central Govt. cannot raise its hand in helplessness and cannot say that it is between banks and customers. Additionally, it directed the Indian Banks Association to check if new guidelines can be brought in force. The Court has also asked the Centre and Reserve Bank of India to review the matter.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, Instagram, LinkedIn, Facebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

Latest News

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -