SC Grants Interim Protection to Vinod Dua From Arrest, Refuses to Stay Investigation

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

The Supreme Court granted senior journalist Vinod Dua interim protection from arrest in connection with an FIR. Himachal Police registered the FIR alleging sedition. But the Court refuses to stay investigation and grants all permissions in the same matter.

Brief Facts of the Case

Vinod Dua is a senior journalist. BJP leader Ajay Shyam had accused him of making derogatory statements in his YouTube show ‘The Vinod Dua show’. He accused Dua of spreading communal disharmony through his show. Recently, the Delhi Police filed an FIR against him but he was granted anticipatory bail in the matter. On June 11, the Delhi High Court stayed the investigation against Vinod Dua in an FIR.

In addition to this, the Himachal Pradesh Police filed another FIR in the same matter and summoned him. This case is in connection with sedition charges levelled against him by Ajay Shyam. The Himachal police demanded his presence for the investigation in the current matter. He was thereby directed to reach Kumarsain Police Station on or before 13th June 2020 at 10 am sharp.

Mr. Dua replied to the same by stating that since he is a resident of New Delhi, he would have to quarantine himself after reaching Himachal. He sheds light on his medical condition and also states that he is a senior citizen. The MOH guidelines ask senior citizens to not travel and to stay indoors. However, he ensured full cooperation in the investigation process. He also recommends the alternative of email or any other online mechanism to do the same. 

Thus, he filed a petition to the Supreme Court, seeking protection against coercive action in multiple FIRs. 

Arguments Before the Court

Learned Counsel Mr. Vikas Singh appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Mr Vinod Dua contended in his plea that the FIR is bogus. He also argued that the police was proceeding against him in the most malicious manner. 

Additionally, he submitted that the Himachal Police had issued a notice on 11 June 2020. He pressed for a stay on the investigation. He pointed out that none of the alleged offences has been made prima facie. In his communication of the notice, he has assured complete cooperation. This promised this through online mode or video conferencing. 

Court’s Order

A bench comprising of Justices Uday Umesh Lalit, Mohan M. Shanatanagoudar and Vineet Sara presided over this matter. They issued a notice to the Himachal Pradesh Police, and the Centre. They passed that pending further orders, the petitioner shall not be arrested in connection with the second case. Nevertheless, as per the offer made by him in his communication dated 12.06.2020, he must extend full cooperation through Video Conferencing or Online mode.

Nonetheless, the Court entitled the Himachal Pradesh Police to carry on with the investigation. The process may include interrogation of the petitioner at his residence. However, this must be after giving him prior notice 24 hours before the interrogation. They must also comply with the social distancing norms prescribed during the ongoing pandemic. 

The Court further directed the police to file a complete status report. This must indicate the steps taken during the investigation. Additionally, it also directed the concerned Investigating Officer to remain present in the subsequent hearings. 

The Court enlisted the case for its next hearing on 6th July.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -