New Zealand Court Convicts Samoan Chief for Human Trafficking and Slavery

Must Read

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

Follow us

Joseph Auga Matamata is a New Zealand based Samoan chief. The 65-year-old was found guilty by the High Court, Napier. He was accused of illegally trafficking Samoan nationals to New Zealand for 25 years. The victims were subject to forced labor and slavery.

Background

Matamata illegally bought relatives from his village in Samoa to New Zealand. The workers were promised wages but received nothing. The Samoan nationals were exploited and forced to work for Matamata’s financial gains in the Horticulture industry. The victims were bound on a farm with a tall fence and locked gate. Communicate was forbidden with each other or with the outside world. Matamata faces ten counts of trafficking and 13 counts of slavery.

Arguments

The victim statements alleged that they were promised work and money to lure them into his property. The victims were assaulted and made to work for long hours.

The Crown appealed to the jury to look at the offenses as two sides of the same coin. Matamata trafficked the victims into New Zealand and then exploited them for labor through slavery. It was argued that Matamata trafficked people for 25 years. He did so for his monetary gains.

Matamata’s counsel argued based on Cultural discount for prison time. The Samoan Culture holds the ‘Matai’ or the head of the family to be the leader of the family. The decisions of the Matai are not to be questioned and are to be assumed to be taken in the best interests of the family. The counsel submitted that the decisions of the defendant were motivated by his Samoan culture rather than the conceptual understanding of the interests of the victims.

Legislation

The New Zealand legislation holds human trafficking to be one of the most severe offenses. The maximum penalty for this crime is 20 years imprisonment. There is a concept of the Minimum Period of Imprisonment (MPI) before eligibility to apply for parole. The MPI is usually 50% of the prison time. Severe crimes are generally given an MPI as an added restriction. The court, in this case, did not provide for an MPI.

Court’s Opinion

Justice Helen Cull presided the court. The court discussed the sentencing goals to be denunciation and deterrence. The crimes of human trafficking and slavery are abhorrent crimes with one of the victims being just 12 years old. The court was in the opinion that the exploitation of fellow human beings is unacceptable. The International Obligation of the nation in eradicating these crimes was an essential factor.

Court’s Decision

The Court ordered Matamata to pay $183,000NZ and was sentenced to 11 years in prison. The Court also held that Matamata is to undergo the Medium Intensity Rehabilitation program. This was because of the transformational system to address his mental state towards violence.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -