Federal Court of Appeals Allows Trump Administration to End Humanitarian Programs Shielding Hundreds of Immigrants From Deportation

Must Read

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Follow us

The three-judge panel in the ninth-circuit court allowed the administration’s efforts to end the Temporary Protected Status of certain immigrants. This brings around 300000 immigrants living in the US under the radar to be deported. The ruling was 2:1, with the majority ruling that the U.S Department of Homeland Security’s decision is not reviewable. 

Background

The case was first brought before the District Court for Northern District of California in 2018. The plaintiffs had sought an injunction on the termination order by the Trump Administration. The court granted this injunction and stopped the process of termination. It was then submitted for an appeal to the Federal Appeals Court.

The present case has decided the fate of four countries whose immigrants have been protected by the Temporary Protected Status for over two decades. Immigrants from El Salvador, Nicaragua, Sudan and Haiti will not be given this protection anymore. 

Temporary Protected Status

The Temporary Protected Status was devised in the 1990s. It was done to protect vulnerable persons from being deported. This protection was given to immigrants from countries which are struck by natural disasters, armed conflict or immigrants who are unsafe in their home country. Recent developments in the Trump administration have allowed the Salvadoran immigrants protection of an extra year while the other countries do not receive any such immunity. 

Court’s Opinion 

The dissent given by Circuit Judge Morgan Christen stated that the TPS termination is reviewable and violated the federal administrative law. The other important observation is the impact of the termination; she stated that this termination will cause monumental consequences to thousands of people. The majority held that there has not been shown the likeliness of the equal protection clause being violated and thus the administration can go ahead with ending the TPS program for these countries. 

Court’s Decision

The 2:1 decision by the court allowed the Trump Administration to continue the process and efforts to end the Temporary Protected Status for the immigrants from El Salvador, Nicaragua, Sudan and Haiti. 

Implication of the Decision 

This decision places thousands of immigrants under the direct threat of deportation to their home countries. Many young American children of these immigrants will be faced with a horrific choice of being displaced to a new country or being separated from their family.  The temporary Protected Status has forever been debated by the two political parties in the United States.

Recently, presidential candidate, Joe Biden vowed to shield the holders of TPS and provide further protection for Venezuelans. The decision will pave the way for the administration to decide on the immigrants from other countries of Nepal and Honduras. The plaintiffs are to file an ‘en banc’ vote by 11 judges where the case would be reconsidered.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by the Exporters Association before the...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -