High Power Committee Categorization of Prisoners for Interim Bail is Not Arbitrary: Supreme Court

Must Read

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector &...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court,...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first...

Follow us

A Full Bench held that the prisoners cannot be granted a benefit in unprecedented circumstances. A release of all categories of prisoners based on the principle of equality irrespective of categorization will not achieve social order. There is a need to make classifications depending on the severity of the crime among other factors.

Brief facts of the case

The Supreme Court ordered the constitution of a High Powered Committee (“HPC”) in each state for deliberating on the decongestion of the prisons. In the wake of the pandemic, this committee was designated to determine which classes of prisoners were to be granted interim bail. The criteria were to be based on their term of imprisonment, among other factors.

The HPC in Maharashtra classified the prisoners into three categories. These are prisoners convicted for 7 years or less and prisoners sentenced for more than 7 years based on the IPC provisions. The third category of prisoners include persons convicted for serious economic offences/bank scams and offences under Special Acts (such as MCOC, PMLA, MPID, NDPS, UAPA, etc.) 

This categorization emphasized the ‘nature of the offence’ and the ‘severity of offence’ for grant of interim bail.

The Appellants find the categorization of the HPC discriminatory. They also point at the unreasonableness in imposing a condition of “earlier release of the convicted person” as a factor for bail under the category of prisoners with a sentence of more than 7 years.

The High Court of Bombay refused to interfere with the orders of the HPC. Hence the present appeal.

Arguments Advanced

The categorization made by the HPC is not to be treated as mandatory orders. This is because the committee was constituted for a temporary role in the situation of the pandemic. Also, prisoners convicted for life imprisonment should be released without insisting on past releases as furlough or parole.

Court’s Observations

The Bench upheld the categorization set by the HPC. It also stated that under Article 14 of the Constitution, equality before the law or the equal protection of laws does not mean an abstract symmetry in the treatment of persons. Rather, a reasonable classification is permitted to be undertaken for justice.

Further, the right to claim such interim bail arises due to the unprecedented circumstance of the pandemic. The present provision for an interim bail is not a statutory right, but a human right to safeguard the health of the prison inmates. This option of applying for an interim bail is only for decongestion and to prevent the spread of the virus in the premises of the prison. Hence, the categories of prisoners will be different in each State or Union Territory. It depends on the occupancy in the prison, the spread of the virus, the infrastructure available, and the need to release a certain number of prisoners for decongestion.

The HPC is headed by a High Court judge along with other officials having enough experience. Hence the categorization of prisoners is based on reasonable grounds.

The intention of the Supreme Court through such an order was not to release every prisoner irrespective of the offence committed. The Bench upheld the third category of classification made by the HPC. Special legislation provides for more restrictions on grant of bail and also to those under the CrPc. 

It cannot be considered as unreasonable as the Court granting bail would also consider the provisions of the Special legislations if not for the notification for decongestion. This exclusion made has a reasonable basis and cannot be termed arbitrary under Article 14.

In paragraph 12 of the judgment, the Court explained the reasonability of the method used by the HPC for the grant of interim bail. The present grant of bail is only to reduce overcrowding and thus is an extra benefit. No other legal right has been denied as it is only the benefit of release owing to COVID-19 that has been restricted. 

Court’s Decision

The HPC has excluded certain categories of prisoners due to the seriousness of their offences affecting the society. Even though their length of imprisonment is lesser, the nature of the offence can restrict them from this extra benefit.

Such prisoners cannot get bail in the cover of the pandemic when they are otherwise not entitled by the law, on the ground of equal treatment. Hence, the criteria formed by the HPC do not need any interference.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being imposed.  Brief facts of the case This...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961.  Brief facts of the...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court, Bhuj in the case of...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first consignment, on 10.06.2020 and the,...

Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre, RBI in PIL to Regulate Online Lending Platforms

A notice had been issued by the Delhi HC in a PIL that sought regulation of online lending platforms (Dharanidhar Karimojji vs UOI). Brief Facts: The...

“Consensual Affair” Cannot Be Defence Against the Charge of Kidnapping of the Minor, Sentence Reduced in View of Age Difference: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the appeal against the conviction under the charges of kidnapping and discussed whether the punishment was to be enhanced or not.   Brief...

Delhi HC to Municipal Corp: Paucity of Funds Not an Excuse for Non-Payment of Salaries and Pensions

The Delhi High Court ruled that the paucity of funds cannot be an excuse and pulled up municipal corporations for not paying salaries and pensions to their employees as the right to receive payment is a fundamental right guaranteed in our constitution.

US Supreme Court Reinstates Restriction on Abortion Pills

The Supreme Court of the United States granted the Trump administration’s request to reinstate federal rules requiring women to make in-person visits to hospitals...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -