Tripura High Court holds that the Service Rule of Repatriating Deputionists at least Six Months Prior is Directory

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to...

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

Uttarakhand High Court Directed State Authorities To Frame SOP Regarding Kumbh Mela 2021

Noticing the commencement date of Kumbh Mela 2021 amid pandemic from 27 February 2021, the Uttarakhand High Court on Monday expressed concern with regard to organizing and conducting of the Mela and directed State Authorities to discuss and resolve the logistical problems which can come in organizing the Mela during the pandemic time.

Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Mahindra Finance, Being a Purely Private Body: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court reiterated that Writ Petition against the purely private body is not maintainable and dismissed the petition which was filed against Mahindra Finance Bank as Arif Khan v. Branch Manager Mahindra Finance Sultanpur & Another.

Follow us

In the case of Sri Nikhil Chandra vs State of Tripura & Ors, WP(C) No.309/2020,  Hon’ble Justice Mr Akhil Kureshi dealt with the challenge to an order repatriating deputationists to parent organization from government service.

Brief Facts

A memorandum was issued by the Under-Secretary of the Tripura Government to post 10 employees of TSCCF including the Petitioner in the office of Sub Divisional Magistrate. By an order dated 30.03.2006, the petitioner was posted in the office of Sub-Divisional Magistrate. These employees were released by TSCCF to join their duty, to which Petitioner reported on 31.03.2006 which was recorded through an order which states that their services will be treated as on deputation for 2 years. On 29.09.2009, Petitioner wrote a letter to Secretary, Revenue Department that he has not been issued a letter of appointment absorbing him as an employee of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, later on, 26.05.2020 an order that sought to repatriate the Petitioner to his previous organization was made since he was nearing superannuation. This order has been challenged through a writ petition.

Arguments Advanced

Respondents submitted that the government has clearly conveyed on 16.03.2006 that the staff may be withdrawn and posted to newly created Sub-Divisions of Teliamura and Santirbazar clearly conveying that petitioner was sent on deputation. Such change was allowed since the financial condition of TSCCF was weak and wanted to avoid the termination of employment. A deputationist has no right of absorption in the Government service. The Government policy does not permit any such absorption. Further, the Petitioner has been transferred to the parent organization in order to regulate his financial benefits as superannuation is nearing. The government had taken a decision on 21.05.2020 that employees of PSUs and Board cannot be to the government department and must be repatriated min 6 months prior to retirement.

Petitioners contended that the order on 30.03.2006 gives no indication that the Petitioner was sent on deputation and uses the words “appointed and posted” which was without any notice changed into the words deputation in the order of 02.06.2006. Rule 110 of Fundamental Rules does not envisage deputation to government service but only deputation from government service. Further, he has for several years discharged the duty under government service without any blemish and repatriation right before retirement is arbitrary. Since the initial order did not mention any deputation but appointment, the petitioner never consented to any deputation service.

Court’s Observation & Judgment

The court observed that the petitioner was sent on deputation as clearly mentioned in the order dated 02.06.2006 which also contains the terms of service. This clearly shows the intention of the government and was conveyed adequately to the Petitioner. Earlier orders had loosely used the words “appointed and posted”. Petitioner has not contended that he ever disputed him being appointed as a deputationist by order dated 02.06.2006 and therefore clearly understood his duties was of a deputationist and exercised them so. There is no requirement of statutory rule for an employee to be sent on deputation and there is nothing to suggest that consent of employees cannot be derived from circumstances. The provision of repatriation minimum 6 months prior to retirement is to be taken directory and not mandatory. Deputionist cannot have a right to permanent absorption and depends on the policy of the department. Hence the petition stands dismissed.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

Uttarakhand High Court Directed State Authorities To Frame SOP Regarding Kumbh Mela 2021

Noticing the commencement date of Kumbh Mela 2021 amid pandemic from 27 February 2021, the Uttarakhand High Court on Monday expressed concern with regard to organizing and conducting of the Mela and directed State Authorities to discuss and resolve the logistical problems which can come in organizing the Mela during the pandemic time.

Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Mahindra Finance, Being a Purely Private Body: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court reiterated that Writ Petition against the purely private body is not maintainable and dismissed the petition which was filed against Mahindra Finance Bank as Arif Khan v. Branch Manager Mahindra Finance Sultanpur & Another.

Publication of Notices for Inter-Faith Marriages No Longer Mandatory: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has passed a landmark judgment that likely brings relief to inter-faith marriage. The Court on Wednesday said that the mandatory publication of Notices of Inter-Faith marriages will now be optional to protect the Privacy and Liberty of the Couple. The Court observed that the publication of the notice would “invade the fundamental rights of liberty and privacy”. Therefore, it has made it optional for the couple, they can now request in form of writing to a marriage officer to publish or not to publish a notice regarding the marriage.

Bombay High Court to NIA: Consider Health and Age of Varavara Rao Before Opposing His Bail Plea

The Bombay HC on Wednesday observed that ‘we are all humans’ and asked the National Investigation Agency and the Maharashtra Government to consider the health and age of the Telugu poet-activist Varavara Rao before making submissions in response to his bail plea application on medical grounds.

Supreme Court Agrees To Examine Centre’s Plea To Keep Adultery a Crime in Armed Forces

The Centre appealed to the Supreme court on Wednesday, pleading that the 2018 judgment of decriminalizing adultery under IPC must not apply to the armed forces. The Supreme Court in a path-breaking verdict in 2018 decriminalized adultery and declared all its provisions unconstitutional as it diminishes the value of women, but maintained that it continues to be a ground for divorce.

Supreme Court Examines the Pollution in Yamuna River for the Second Time

The Supreme Court on Wednesday made a second attempt to clean the Yamuna river by taking a Suo Moto Cognizance of significantly high levels of ammonia water discharged from neighbouring states like Haryana into Delhi.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -