Tripura HC Dismisses Appeal to Reconsider Settled Principles of Past Services on Reappointment

Must Read

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration,...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be...

Follow us

On 11th August 2020, the Hon’ble Chief Justice of Tripura High Court Mr. Akhil Kureshi and Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay dealt with the WA No. 231/2019 The State of Tripura and Ors. Vs Shri Kaushik Majumder dealt with an appeal to decide the effect of past services on new appointments to government education services posts.

Facts of the Case 

The petitioners have approached the court by way of an appeal against the single judge bench judgment dated 3rd April 2019 in WP(C) No.192 of 2019. In this judgment, the facts involved are as follows: The petitioners were made to join to the post of postgraduate teacher and on completion of 5 years on fixed pay, a memorandum was issued to accord regular pay scale to the Petitioners. After the selection of Petitioners to the post of postgraduate teacher, they submitted a prayer for technical resignation which was accepted.

After this, the petitioners were again freshly appointed as postgraduate teachers on fixed monthly payments for one year. This process was challenged. On the ground of non-compliance with the law since the government has issued fresh letters of appointment, completely ignoring the past services so rendered by them and treating their service as a fresh from the date of their selection so undertaken according to the terms of the fresh selection process.

The Court referring to Babul Debnath vs the State of Tripura and Tanmoy Nath vs the State of Tripura decided that the past service of the petitioners were to be considered for seniority, pension, and all other benefits.

Laws Involved

In the case of Sangita Reang & Ors vs the State of Tripura, the court considered the decisions in the case of Tanmoy Nath vs the State of Tripura and Babul Debnath vs the State of Tripura and elaborated on three kinds of situations that can arise in the case of appointment, disqualification, and reappointment. First is previously and subsequently selected to the same post; Second is subsequently appointed to a post higher than the previous one; Third is subsequently appointed to a post inferior to the earlier post. Court held for the first category, the full benefit of past service could be availed; for the second category, past service rendered by the petitioners will be counted for pension, pay fixation and all other purposes except for seniority; for the third category past service would be counted for the limited purpose of retaining their leave credit, provident fund, pension, and gratuity

Court’s Decision and Conclusion

The Court held that the principles laid down in the case of Sangita Reang vs the State of Tripura would apply for deciding the effect of past services to the new posts. Further, the precedents before the Sangita Reang case have been considered and affirmed in the spirit in the case and would apply to the present set of facts and appeal. The Single judge bench has applied the law correctly and hence the appeal was disposed of.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -