Kerala High Court Grants Approves Bail Application

Must Read

Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre, RBI in PIL to Regulate Online Lending Platforms

A notice had been issued by the Delhi HC in a PIL that sought regulation of online lending platforms...

“Consensual Affair” Cannot Be Defence Against the Charge of Kidnapping of the Minor, Sentence Reduced in View of Age Difference: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the appeal against the conviction under the charges of kidnapping and discussed whether the punishment was...

Delhi HC to Municipal Corp: Paucity of Funds Not an Excuse for Non-Payment of Salaries and Pensions

The Delhi High Court ruled that the paucity of funds cannot be an excuse and pulled up municipal corporations for not paying salaries and pensions to their employees as the right to receive payment is a fundamental right guaranteed in our constitution.

US Supreme Court Reinstates Restriction on Abortion Pills

The Supreme Court of the United States granted the Trump administration’s request to reinstate federal rules requiring women to...

Supreme Court Upheld “Environmental Rule of Law” in NGT Decision to Demolish Illegal Hotel on Forest Land

This case concerns the dispute relating to the additional construction of hotel-cum-restaurant structure in the Bus Stand Complex along...

UK Supreme Court Rules in Favour of Policyholders in the COVID-19 Business Interruption Case

The United Kingdom’s Supreme Court finally concluded the long-awaited COVID-19 business interruption case brought by the Financial Conduct Authority...

Follow us

On 26 August 2020, The Kerala High Court involving a single bench judge of Honourable Mr Justice Ashok Menon heard the case of Prince v. State of Kerala.

Facts of the Case

Applicants are accused 1 and 2, Prince and Sunny of Chavara Thekkumbhagom Police Station, Kollam, for having allegedly committed offences punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147, 341, 323, 324, 326 and 427 r/w 149 of the IPC. On 16.02.2020 at about 10.30 PM, at a place called Ayyankoyikkal Vanchimukku, the applicants’ Prince and Sunny along with 5 others, all part of an unlawful assembly, caused grievous hurt to the defacto complainant. The de facto complainant was travelling on a motorcycle when one of the accused kicked him and he fell down. They also assaulted him with sticks. One Krishnamoorthy, who came to assist the defacto complainant was severely beaten up by the accused, as a result of which, he also sustained injury. The friend of the defacto complainant had lost his eyesight in the attack. A mobile phone belonging to the defacto complainant worth ₹30,000 was also lost in the scuffle.

Petitioners’ Argument

The applicants state that they are innocent and the allegations are false. The applications were disposed of, with a direction to surrender before the Investigating Officer. Accordingly, both of them surrendered on 11.08.2020. Custodial interrogation is over, recovery is also complete. The applicants, therefore, pray that they may be released on bail. It is further submitted that the 3rd accused has already been granted bail.

Respondents’ Argument

The learned public prosecutor points out to the antecedents of the applicants by stating that they were involved in ever so many cases including offence under Section 302 of the IPC and therefore, releasing them on bail would only result in their reiterating similar offences.

Court’s Observation

The court in the case of Chidambaram P. v. Directorate of Enforcement (2019 (16) SCALE 870), observed that it is a well-accepted principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception so as to ensure that the accused has the opportunity of securing fair trial.

Court’s Decision

In the end, the application is allowed and the applicants are directed to be released on bail after the execution of bonds for ₹50,000 each, with two solvent sureties, each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court and on following further conditions:

(i) They shall appear before the Investigating Officer on all Mondays, between 9.00 Am and 12.00 Pm for a period of three months or till filing of the final report whichever is earlier.

(ii) They shall not intimidate or influence witnesses and tamper with evidence.

(iii) They shall not get involved in similar offences during the currency of the bail period.

In case of breach of any of the bail conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to apply for cancellation of the bail before the jurisdictional court.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments of the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre, RBI in PIL to Regulate Online Lending Platforms

A notice had been issued by the Delhi HC in a PIL that sought regulation of online lending platforms (Dharanidhar Karimojji vs UOI). Brief Facts: The...

“Consensual Affair” Cannot Be Defence Against the Charge of Kidnapping of the Minor, Sentence Reduced in View of Age Difference: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the appeal against the conviction under the charges of kidnapping and discussed whether the punishment was to be enhanced or not.   Brief...

Delhi HC to Municipal Corp: Paucity of Funds Not an Excuse for Non-Payment of Salaries and Pensions

The Delhi High Court ruled that the paucity of funds cannot be an excuse and pulled up municipal corporations for not paying salaries and pensions to their employees as the right to receive payment is a fundamental right guaranteed in our constitution.

US Supreme Court Reinstates Restriction on Abortion Pills

The Supreme Court of the United States granted the Trump administration’s request to reinstate federal rules requiring women to make in-person visits to hospitals...

Supreme Court Upheld “Environmental Rule of Law” in NGT Decision to Demolish Illegal Hotel on Forest Land

This case concerns the dispute relating to the additional construction of hotel-cum-restaurant structure in the Bus Stand Complex along with a bus stand and...

UK Supreme Court Rules in Favour of Policyholders in the COVID-19 Business Interruption Case

The United Kingdom’s Supreme Court finally concluded the long-awaited COVID-19 business interruption case brought by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Hiscox Action...

Kerala High Court Disposes of Writ Petition on Grounds That Reliefs Sought Are Already in Process of Being Granted, Directs State to Complete the...

Excerpt A single-judge bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice Shircy V. gave orders on the writ petition filed by the Petitioner. This writ is filed by...

Supreme Court Directs Government To Provide Free Education To Minor Children of Rape Victims

The Deputy Commissioner of Ranchi was directed by the Supreme Court on Wednesday to make sure that minor children of rape victims are ensured free education till they attain the age of 14 years. The Court made the observation while hearing a plea filed by a woman who claimed that she belonged to the SC/ST group from Jharkhand. She was forced by a man after which her father lodged a complaint.

Aadhar Review Plea Rejected in a 4:1 Verdict by Supreme Court

The petition seeking the re-examination of the 2018 Aadhar Verdict which declares the Aadhar act constitutional and valid was dismissed by a 5-judge bench in a 4:1 verdict. In January the petitions were considered by a bench of Justices A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud, S Abdul Nazeer, Ashok Bhushan, and B R Gavai in the chamber and the order was up on the website on Wednesday.

New Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendments Are Valid Says Supreme Court

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments in the insolvency and bankruptcy code which makes it mandatory for a minimum of 100 or 10% of home buyers of a project to initiate insolvency proceedings against a builder for not delivering flats or commercial shops on time.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -