The Karnataka State Level Advocates Clerks Association moves a Petition, to avail financial aid from the State Government

Must Read

Kerala High Court Rejects Writ Petition for Rejection of Loan Application

Case: Anvardeen. K v. Union of India. Coram: Justice P.V. Asha On 24th November 2020, The Kerala High Court involving a...

Supreme Court: Maritime Board Must Not Wallow in Inaction and Be Arbitrary in Its Contractual Duties

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court held that a State instrumentality such as the Maritime Board is expected...

Supreme Court: Right to Property Is a Constitutional Right, the Essence of Rule of Law Protects It

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court has held that permitting the State to assert indefinite right upon one’s...

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar To Issue Origin Certificates To Two Sisters in Two Writ Petitions

Two Writ Petitions by two siblings was filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The petitions owed to...

Delhi High Court Directs Centre and Delhi Govt To Consider a PIL Seeking Paid Menstrual Leave as Representation

The Delhi High Court had provided direction to consider a petition as representation. The Central and Delhi governments were...

Follow us

A writ petition was moved by Advocate Murthy Dayanand Naik on behalf of Karnataka State Level Advocates Clerks Association, in the Karnataka High Court. They prayed to direct the State Government to sponsor a Rs 5 crores fund for their welfare in the wake of COVID-19 lockdown. 

Brief Facts of the Case 

The plea draws the Court’s attention to the fact that the livelihoods of most of the clerks depend upon the everyday court work. Hence, the nationwide lockdown has left these clerks devoid of any income. 

The petitioners complained that neither the State Government nor the Karnataka State Bar Council bothered to enquire about the association. The filing is under Article 226 (writ petition).

Grounds 

To avail an effective remedy, these are the reasons:

a) The petitioners mention an order dated 16.04.2008. They say that the order directs the State Government to constitute a fund. The name of it is Karnataka Registered Clerks Welfare Fund. But no such action has been taken yet.

b) Both the members and their family members are facing a lot of issues due to the lack of a judicial member. That their families remain hungry due to such a passive attitude. Thus, it is a violation of their fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.

c) There is a violation of Article 47 of the Indian Constitution because of the constant neglect of the situation by the State Government. This makes the State duty-bound:

to raise the level of nutrition and standard of living and to improve public health”. 

d) Similarly, Articles 38 and 46 of the Indian Constitution come into the picture as wellThe State has failed to secure the livelihood of all its citizens. 

e) The State Government, by introducing several welfare schemes has tried to curb the hardship in the wake of COVID-19. We can understand that this is also an infringement of Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, as no welfare schemes are present. 

Prayer 

In the wake of no reforms on the part of:

  • the State Government, the first respondent and 
  • the Karnataka State Bar Council, the second Respondent; 
  • the petitioner, Karnataka State Level Advocates Clerks Association

The payment of Rs 20,000 should be expended per month by the second respondent, for each registered member of the Association. The petitioner expects a direction to the State Government to release a sum of Rs 10,000 per member of the association. They want the State Government “to create a corpus of Rs.5,00,00,000/- to ensure the subsistence of the members of the Petitioner-Association”. Lastly, the State Government should formulate welfare schemes for the members of the Association.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Supreme Court : High Courts Have Sole Authority Under Article 226 To Decide Validity of Tax Provision, Even if Matter Is Sub-Judice Before Income...

A Full Bench of the Supreme Court held that the validity of a provision is a serious matter which could only be decided by...

Kerala High Court Rejects Writ Petition for Rejection of Loan Application

Case: Anvardeen. K v. Union of India. Coram: Justice P.V. Asha On 24th November 2020, The Kerala High Court involving a single bench judge of the...

Supreme Court: Maritime Board Must Not Wallow in Inaction and Be Arbitrary in Its Contractual Duties

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court held that a State instrumentality such as the Maritime Board is expected to act without any arbitrariness...

Supreme Court: Right to Property Is a Constitutional Right, the Essence of Rule of Law Protects It

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court has held that permitting the State to assert indefinite right upon one’s property, without any legal sanction...

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar To Issue Origin Certificates To Two Sisters in Two Writ Petitions

Two Writ Petitions by two siblings was filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The petitions owed to the fact that they were...

Delhi High Court Directs Centre and Delhi Govt To Consider a PIL Seeking Paid Menstrual Leave as Representation

The Delhi High Court had provided direction to consider a petition as representation. The Central and Delhi governments were directed to consider the same....

Madras High Court Reiterates That ‘Ignorance of Law’ Is Not an Excuse and Dismisses Petition by a Constable

A Constable committed bigamy and deserted his service for more than 21 days. After dismissal from his service, he moved to Tamil Nadu Administrative...

Transfer of Winding-up Proceedings Allowed Under S. 434, Restrictions Under 2016 Rules To Not Apply: Allahabad High Court

This appeal relates to the question of transfer of winding-up proceeding from the High Court (Company Court) to the NCLT.  Facts M/s. Girdhar Trading Company, 2nd...

Constitutional Court of South Africa Declares Provisions of Domestic Workers’ Injury Compensation Legislation To Be Unconstitutional

The Constitutional Court of South Africa in Sylvia Mahlangu v Minister of Labour , declared parts of the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases...

Bail Granted Under Section 167(2) CrPC Can Be Cancelled Under Section 439(2) CrPC: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court held that the right of default bail of the Accused can be cancelled under Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Facts...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -