Telangana HC Allows the Withdrawal of the Petition From Civil Judge to Family Court

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

The Telangana High Court gave its order on Smt. Chenagala Harathi v. Sri Chengala Satyaiah on 1 June 2020. It directed the withdrawal of petition from the file of a Senior Civil Judge. Consequently, the court directed its transfer to the file of a Family Court Judge in Ranga Reddy District, L.B. Nagar. 

Brief of the Facts

A husband and wife are the respondent and petitioner respectively in this case. They performed their marriage on 06.05.2001. This took place at Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District. The husband filed for a divorce before the Senior Civil Judge, at Mahaboobnagar. He filed it under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. However, his wife stays at Rajendranagar.

In this case, the petitioner prayed to withdraw the case from the file of the Senior Civil Judge. She prayed to transfer the same to the file of Judge of the Family Court at Ranga Reddy District in L.B.Nagar. This was to ease her process of attaining justice. 

The Contention of the Petitioner   

The counsel for the petitioner contends that the respondent has filed a divorce petition with the Senior Civil Judge at Mahaboobnagar. However, the petitioner stays in Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District. They have had three children who are aged 16, 13 and 11 years, who currently reside with their mother.

The distance between Rajendranagar and Mahaboobnagar is about 120 kilometres. Accordingly, she submitted that it is difficult for her to reach the court in Mahaboobnagar. Therefore, she sought to withdraw the petition from the file of Senior Civil Judge at Mahaboobnagar. The learned counsel further contended that the petitioner seeks to transfer her petition. The transfer would be to the file of Judge, Family Court at Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar. This arrangement would be much more convenient for her. 

The Contention of the Respondent 

The learned counsel for the respondent contended that the petitioner mentally-harassed the respondent. Annoyed with the petitioner, the respondent filed the divorce petition. In addition to this, the respondent claimed that granting relief to the petitioner should not take place. There is an absence of any justifiable grounds. Therefore, any ground to transfer the petition to another court does not arise. 

Observation of the Court 

The Court observed that the petitioner has three minor children, who are now pursuing their studies. She has to travel from Rajendra Nagar to Mahaboobnagar to attend the proceedings. As a result, the petitioner has to either travel along with the minor children or leave them at home. In both circumstances, it causes trouble and hardship to her.

In light of this, the Court interpreted the amended Section 19(iii)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. This Section gives special preference to the wife to file a petition and prosecute the same. She can file it before the Court within whose jurisdiction she resides. The petitioner/wife is residing at Rajendranagar. Hence, the Court finds that the reason is strong enough for granting the relief claimed by her in this case. The purpose of this was for trial and disposal.

The Decision of the Court

The Court allowed the transfer of Civil Miscellaneous Petition. 


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -