Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Judgment Passed by Gurgaon Fast Track Court

Must Read

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on...

Follow us

A criminal appeal was filed before the Supreme Court against the judgment of the Fast track Court, Gurgaon. The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed the appeal and acquitted all the accused.

Brief Facts of the Case

The Fast track Court, Gurgaon convicted the Appellants u/s 396 r/w Section 120-B of IPC. They had been charged and with & tried for offences punishable u/s 302/201/396 of IPC. Through a telephonic message in the Police Station of Farrukh Nagar, it was informed that a dead body was lying near Horse Farm at Pataudi- Gurgaon Road in the area of Patli. After reaching the spot the police recorded the statements of the Complainant that it was his father’s dead body. He stated that someone unknown had murdered his father by strangulation. The trial was started u/s 174 Cr.PC, following lodging of FIR and investigation. During the interrogation, all the Accused disclosed the commission of murder of the said man & that they threw the dead body around Horse Farm.

Arguments before the Court

The counsel on the behalf of the Accused submitted that the disclosure statement was recorded in Farrukh Nagar. He also stated those disclosure statements were recorded in his presence

In cross-examination counsel for the Accused stated that the dead body was lying 7/8 feet from the main road. He was wearing clothes but they were in torn condition & the clothes were stained with blood. The learned PP presented in evidence the Forensic Science laboratory report Bangalore on polygraph examination Ex.PDDD. Ex.PEEE is the Brain Mapping report.

Observation of the Court

The High Court observed that in the case of Selvi v. State of Karnataka, 2010, the Supreme Court held that the compulsory conduct of narco-analysis, polygraph test, and Brain mapping tests violates the “right against self-incrimination” and the test results cannot be admitted in evidence if it has done under compulsion.  

Decision of the Court

The Court in its verdict stated that it would be unsafe to convict the Accused solely based on the recoveries from the disclosure statements of all the Accused. And therefore the appeal was allowed. The Appellants were acquitted from all the charges against them. The Court directed to release the Accused straight away, if not required in any other case.

Click here to view the Judgement.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

Chandigarh Housing Board Is Bound To Implement the Chandigarh Administration’s Policy Decision: Punjab & Haryana High Court

On 15th October 2020, Justices Jaswant Singh and Sant Parkash heard the case of Bhartendu Sood vs Chandigarh Housing Board & Anr., via video-conferencing. Deeming the...

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Doctors Alleging Arbitrary Placement at Government Hospitals for One-Year Mandatory Public Service

The Bombay High Court was hearing a plea against the arbitrary placement of doctors for a mandatory period of one year. The petitioners prayed...

Uttarakhand High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Relief for the Cancellation of Selection Process

On 13th October 2020, a Single Judge Bench of Hon'ble Justice Lok Pal Singh, heard the case of Ashish Bisht & Anr. v. State...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -