PIL Filed Before the Bombay High Court for Timely Disposal of Pending Bail Applications

Must Read

Kerala High Court Rejects Writ Petition for Rejection of Loan Application

Case: Anvardeen. K v. Union of India. Coram: Justice P.V. Asha On 24th November 2020, The Kerala High Court involving a...

Supreme Court: Maritime Board Must Not Wallow in Inaction and Be Arbitrary in Its Contractual Duties

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court held that a State instrumentality such as the Maritime Board is expected...

Supreme Court: Right to Property Is a Constitutional Right, the Essence of Rule of Law Protects It

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court has held that permitting the State to assert indefinite right upon one’s...

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar To Issue Origin Certificates To Two Sisters in Two Writ Petitions

Two Writ Petitions by two siblings was filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The petitions owed to...

Delhi High Court Directs Centre and Delhi Govt To Consider a PIL Seeking Paid Menstrual Leave as Representation

The Delhi High Court had provided direction to consider a petition as representation. The Central and Delhi governments were...

Follow us

The Bombay High Court heard a PIL filed by Peoples Union Civil Liberties & Anr. v. State of Maharastra & Ors. with Archana Rupwate v. State of Maharastra & Ors. The PIL seeks directions to ensure timely disposal of pending bail applications. The PIL also seeks directions on the other problems faced by the inmates of Arthur Road Prison.

Petitioner’s Submission

The counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Desai, stated that the High-Powered Committee has already made recommendations to decongest prisons. He stated that 14,000 bail applications are pending before different criminal courts. The Courts’ presiding officers have to issue directions for the prisoners early release. But they did not dispose of bail applications immediately. He said that keeping many applications pending is not fair. It will not serve the purpose of establishment of the High Power Committee. Moreover, the High-Powered Committee has already released the categories of under-trial prisoners. Hence, the Court should release these prisoners on bail.

He also stated that “We are of the opinion that the relevant courts are not supposed to act as mere post-offices. They allow applications without application of mind.”

Mr Desai mentioned that Arthur Road prisoners are suffering from Coronavirus. A total of 158 prisoners are suffering. It is pertinent to note that this disease transmits quickly.  Thus, there is a need to conduct COVID-19 test of other inmates.

He stated that the family members are not aware of the virus-infected prisoner. Thus, the authorities should not allow personal meetings between inmates and family members. But, the prison authorities should ensure that the inmates can contact their family members. They may do this by allowing them to have phone calls at least twice a week.

Mr. Desai submitted that the family members of inmates are not able to transfer money to inmates. Thus, prison authorities should open separate bank accounts for inmates for transferring money.

Respondent’s Submission

The counsel stated that the memo dated 24.05.2020, was issued by the authorities of Arthur prison. Under this order, the authorities directed prisons to arrange the video-conferencing facility. But, till the time facility get operative, new directions are issued. The authorities will also issue directions to allow two phone calls in a week.

Petitioner’s Prayer

The petitioner wanted that the test for COVID-19 should be conducted for other inmates as well. Hence, the petitioner pleaded before the Court to issue directions for the same. The authorities should inform the families of the COVID-19 positive inmates. The authorities should provide benefits of two phone calls per week. So they can establish contact with their families. Also, prison authorities should open separate bank accounts of inmates.

Court’s Decision

The Court asked the prison authorities to put in place a circular. The circular should state about the opening of bank accounts by inmates. The Court also stated that –

“The Correctional Home authorities will display the bank account number. All other details for money transfer will also be displayed. The authorities will put this information on their website. Once family members transfer money in an inmate bank account, they will use in a manner that benefits him. It will spend used according to law.”

Further, the Court gave time to the respondent authorities to file a reply. The Court will hear the matter again on June 7, 2020.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

Latest News

Supreme Court : High Courts Have Sole Authority Under Article 226 To Decide Validity of Tax Provision, Even if Matter Is Sub-Judice Before Income...

A Full Bench of the Supreme Court held that the validity of a provision is a serious matter which could only be decided by...

Kerala High Court Rejects Writ Petition for Rejection of Loan Application

Case: Anvardeen. K v. Union of India. Coram: Justice P.V. Asha On 24th November 2020, The Kerala High Court involving a single bench judge of the...

Supreme Court: Maritime Board Must Not Wallow in Inaction and Be Arbitrary in Its Contractual Duties

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court held that a State instrumentality such as the Maritime Board is expected to act without any arbitrariness...

Supreme Court: Right to Property Is a Constitutional Right, the Essence of Rule of Law Protects It

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court has held that permitting the State to assert indefinite right upon one’s property, without any legal sanction...

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar To Issue Origin Certificates To Two Sisters in Two Writ Petitions

Two Writ Petitions by two siblings was filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The petitions owed to the fact that they were...

Delhi High Court Directs Centre and Delhi Govt To Consider a PIL Seeking Paid Menstrual Leave as Representation

The Delhi High Court had provided direction to consider a petition as representation. The Central and Delhi governments were directed to consider the same....

Madras High Court Reiterates That ‘Ignorance of Law’ Is Not an Excuse and Dismisses Petition by a Constable

A Constable committed bigamy and deserted his service for more than 21 days. After dismissal from his service, he moved to Tamil Nadu Administrative...

Transfer of Winding-up Proceedings Allowed Under S. 434, Restrictions Under 2016 Rules To Not Apply: Allahabad High Court

This appeal relates to the question of transfer of winding-up proceeding from the High Court (Company Court) to the NCLT.  Facts M/s. Girdhar Trading Company, 2nd...

Constitutional Court of South Africa Declares Provisions of Domestic Workers’ Injury Compensation Legislation To Be Unconstitutional

The Constitutional Court of South Africa in Sylvia Mahlangu v Minister of Labour , declared parts of the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases...

Bail Granted Under Section 167(2) CrPC Can Be Cancelled Under Section 439(2) CrPC: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court held that the right of default bail of the Accused can be cancelled under Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Facts...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -