Orissa High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Order Passed by Disciplinary Authority of Life Insurance Corporation of India

Must Read

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector &...

Follow us

Orissa High Court on 4.01.2021 dismissed a writ petition filed by the assistant administrative officer in Life insurance Corporation who was being accused of losing money belonging to the Institution.

Facts 

The petitioner of the present case works as an assistant administrative officer in the Life insurance Corporation of India. He was allotted the duty of safekeeping cash in the strong room of the branch which is allowed to be handled by only two officers. Sri NC Das is the second key holder along with the petitioner who can access the safe. The office shifted to another building due to construction work, and the safe from the branch which had the cash was shifted to the ground floor of the other building. 

On the day of the shifting, two cash boxes were removed and Sri Subash Nayak (daily wage earner) was assigned to deliver them at the instructed counter. After delivering 2 safes, the daily wage earner & sub-staff proceeded to get the other safe along with a packet containing a few loose notes whereby they were instructed to wait until the safe wasn’t locked.

The sub-staff however left, which the petitioner was unaware of. Upon inquiry with the daily wage earner regarding the safe not being submitted at the counter, it was realized that the safe had not been submitted at the counter. A thorough search was conducted for the amount of 2,07,057.43 & subsequently, an FIR was filed and necessary disciplinary actions followed. 

Petitioners Arguments

Sri U.C. Pattnaik learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had fully disclosed that he gave the boxes to the daily wager and locked the Iron safe within which the daily wager left with the money and the FIR filed by the Institution is against the daily wager who lost the third box of cash and the packet of loose notes and is facing trial under Section 406 of the I.P.C., therefore, the petitioner could not have been held responsible for the loss of the amount. 

The learned counsel also mentions that there has been no proper inquiry which shows that the petitioner is guilty and that the petitioner has raised all these grounds before the Appellate Authority as well as the highest Authority of the Institution, i.e. the Chairman, which were all rejected and therefore, claimed all the impugned orders involved herein should be interfered with and set aside.

Respondents Arguments

On the other hand, Sri P.K. Rath, learned counsel for the Insurance Company, taking the Court to the findings of the Disciplinary Authority, Enquiry Officer, the First Appellate Authority and the Second Appellate Authority in his opposition to claim that the petitioner submitted that for the continuous findings of fact by all the three Authorities involved in a disciplinary proceeding issue hence there is no reason to interfere with any orders.

The learned counsel also argued that looking to the current findings on the facts holding the petitioner and the 2nd key holder responsible for the loss of a sum of Rs.2,07,057.43 and the Authority punishing the petitioner with only a penalty of Censure and recovery of 50% of the lost amount, the punishment ordered by the Disciplinary Authority against the petitioner appears to be very lenient requiring no interference by this Court. The learned counsel referred to the inquiry report, the findings of the disciplinary authority also argued that otherwise also there was no quality in the claim of the petitioner.

Order

The Court on 4.01.2021 dismissed the writ petition on the grounds that it had no merit. The court also declared that there will be no interference with any of the impugned orders.

Click here to read the judgment.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being imposed.  Brief facts of the case This...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961.  Brief facts of the...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court, Bhuj in the case of...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -