Madras High Court Disposes of Petition Related To Trademark ‘Gold Winner’ After Parties Sign Memorandum of Compromise

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

In the case of M/s. Kaleesuwari Refinery Private Ltd. v. M/s. Sri Shakthi Refineries Private Ltd., Justice Mr C.V Karthikeyan heard and disposed of the petition with a direction to the petitioner.

The petition was disposed of as both the parties signed a memorandum agreeing to specific terms and conditions. The petition was filed for:

  1. For issuing a permanent injunction to the defendant and their ancillaries from infringing the plaintiff’s registered Trade Mark Gold Winner by using any mark or word deceptively similar to the plaintiff trademark.
  2. For issuing a permanent injunction to the defendant and their ancillaries from passing off their inferior products as the plaintiff’s trademark Gold Winner by manufacturing pouch deceptively similar to the trademark or using offending words regarding it.
  3. For issuing a permanent injunction to the defendant and their ancillaries from violating the plaintiff’s copyright in the artistic work used in the plaintiff’s packing material or pouches for the packing of plaintiff’s Gold Winner by using packing dress and colour scheme similar to that of plaintiff’s/
  4. For preliminary decree directing the defendant to render an accurate account of profits made by the defendant by using the aforesaid offending label of Gold Premier.
  5. To direct the defendant and ancillaries to surrender the goods manufactured by defendants for destruction by order of this court.
  6. For erasure, removal or obliteration from all infringing goods, materials or articles in the possession or control of the defendant with the offending mark/labels and pouches deceptively similar to the plaintiff’s Gold Winner refined sunflower oil.

Memorandum of Compromise

The Memorandum of the Compromise between the parties included the following conditions that both the parties agreed to:

  1. The defendant agreed not to use the trademark or similar marking to that of the plaintiff with regards to Gold winner.
  2. The defendant undertakes not to pass-off the goods as and for those of the plaintiff’s by adopting the similar or identical get up, colour scheme, the arrangement of the colour, get up and logo of the plaintiff’s product.
  3. The defendant shall erase, remove, or obliterate from all infringing goods, materials or articles in his possession or control with the offending mark labels and pouches claimed to be deceptively similar to the plaintiff’s Gold Winner.
  4. The defendant shall not further violate the plaintiff’s copyright in the artistic work used in the packing pouches of the plaintiff. If violated, the defendant is subjected to compensate the plaintiff for his malafide action.
  5. The defendant agreed to compensate the plaintiff with the damages.
  6. Both the parties agreed to terms, final settlement of all disputes regarding the present subject matter and have no further claims against each other in regards to the present subject matter,

Decision of Court

The court disposed of the petition.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -