Madhya Pradesh High Court Disposes of Plea to Postpone Rajya Sabha Elections

Must Read

“Dismissal Without Inquiry Is Justified if Employee Did Not Prove Minimum Working Period”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the dispute relating to the termination of an employee without any disciplinary inquiry. Brief facts of the...

“Rape Victim To Be Provided Shelter Due To Media Attention Prohibited Under Section 228A of the IPC”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the petition by a rape victim for rehabilitation as she was social ostracization.  Brief facts of the...

Benefit of Probation Not Excluded by the Provisions of Mandatory Minimum Sentence Under Section 397 of Ipc

This case concerns the dispute regarding the granting of probation on good conduct to the accused under the age...

Supreme Court Asks for the Centre’s Response on PIL Filed Seeking the Formation of a Media Tribunal

The Supreme Court sought responses from the Press Council of India (PCI), News Broadcasters Association (NBA) on a PIL which sought to set up a media tribunal to tackle issues concerning the media like complaints against media, channels, and networks. Media has become like an unruly horse that has to be tamed to express the plea.

Law Student Asked the Supreme Court To Take Suo Moto Cognizance of the Violent Farmer Protests

A law student of Mumbai University, Ashish Rai has asked the Supreme Court to take Suo Moto Cognizance of the insult to the national flag done by the farmer protests at the Red Fort. In the course of the farmer's tractor rally on Tuesday, some of the protesters unfurled their own flags by entering the premises of the Red Fort.

Farmers Meeting With the Supreme Court Committee Postponed To Jan 29 Due To the Traffic Restrictions

Due to the traffic restrictions after the violent protests broke out on Republic Day, the meeting of farmers with the Supreme Court Committee that was supposed to take place today was postponed to 29th January.

Follow us

Dr. Aman Sharma filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. It challenges the notification number 37/2020 issued by the Election Commission.

Brief Facts of the Case

The Election Commission of India announced biennial Rajya Sabha elections on June 1, 2020. It will conduct an election for 24 seats from 10 states. The state of Madhya Pradesh represents three seats in the upcoming election. Madhya Pradesh has 230 seats in the State Legislative Assembly. It requires 52 votes to elect a Rajya Sabha member.

The ruling political party in the state, BJP has 107 members in the House. Whereas, the opposition, Congress, has 92 members to win one of the three seats.

However, the Assembly is currently not at its full strength. There have been 24 vacancies. On 23.3.2020, 22 ministers resigned leading to the fall of the government, leading to vacancies. Two seats are vacant on account of the demise of members. 

Thus, the petitioner filed a plea to postpone the elections in Madhya Pradesh.

 Polity 

The petition relies on Representation of People Act, 1950 to distinguish between the electoral college and Legislative Assemblies. Several sections of Representation of People’s Act, 1951 lays down functions and duties of the Election Commission of India. While, Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961 entails the procedure of calculating votes for a winning candidate. In the present case, its usage is to explain the calculation of enough quota. Rules 71 to 85 explain this quota.  

Submissions of the Petitioner 

The petitioner has challenged the notification regarding Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly. As per Schedule II of the said Act, Madhya Pradesh determines 230 seats. Due to the 24 vacancies, representation of 1/10th of the House will not be possible.

Moreover, only 207 members will cast a vote to determine sufficient quota. This will be the basis for further counting and declaration of result. Hence, there will be a deprivation of the right to vote for 24 members of the Assembly. This will lead to an unfair election. 

The petitioner has distinguished the electoral procedure between States and Union Territories. Section 27 (J) of the Act provides for Rajya Sabha elections despite vacancies in case of union territories. Nevertheless, Legislative Assemblies do not come under its ambit.

Assertion of the Plea

“As the elections to the Rajya Sabha are held by transferable votes, therefore sufficient quota must be determined for counting of votes, and there will be the wrong quota unless the vacancies are filled. Therefore, the holding of polling and counting on June 19, 2020, is illegal, unconstitutional and without jurisdiction.” 

Furthermore, Article 329 preventing Court interference in electoral matters cannot bar the petition. It referred to Supreme Court judgment in Election Commission of India v. Ashok (2000). It held that election commission’s action or order would be open for judicial review.

The petition also works out the math that calculates the sufficient quota, i.e. 2886. However, due to 24 vacancies, it becomes 2813 leading to erroneous counting.

Section 151 and 147 of the Representation of People’s Act, 1951 binds election commission. Elections should be held within six months of vacancies. Section 147 relates to the filling of casual vacancies in the council of states. Thus, election notification should have been issued only after filling 24 vacancies in legislative Assembly. 

Court’s Decision

Chief Justice A.K. Mittal and Justice V. K. Shukla decided the present matter in WP/ 8411/ 2020. The petition stands disposed.

Conduction of the Rajya Sabha elections will be as per schedule on June 19, 2020. 


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

 

Latest News

“Dismissal Without Inquiry Is Justified if Employee Did Not Prove Minimum Working Period”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the dispute relating to the termination of an employee without any disciplinary inquiry. Brief facts of the case The Respondent, Smt. Sureshwati was...

“Rape Victim To Be Provided Shelter Due To Media Attention Prohibited Under Section 228A of the IPC”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the petition by a rape victim for rehabilitation as she was social ostracization.  Brief facts of the case In this case, a writ...

Benefit of Probation Not Excluded by the Provisions of Mandatory Minimum Sentence Under Section 397 of Ipc

This case concerns the dispute regarding the granting of probation on good conduct to the accused under the age of twenty-one years.   Brief facts of...

Supreme Court Asks for the Centre’s Response on PIL Filed Seeking the Formation of a Media Tribunal

The Supreme Court sought responses from the Press Council of India (PCI), News Broadcasters Association (NBA) on a PIL which sought to set up a media tribunal to tackle issues concerning the media like complaints against media, channels, and networks. Media has become like an unruly horse that has to be tamed to express the plea.

Law Student Asked the Supreme Court To Take Suo Moto Cognizance of the Violent Farmer Protests

A law student of Mumbai University, Ashish Rai has asked the Supreme Court to take Suo Moto Cognizance of the insult to the national flag done by the farmer protests at the Red Fort. In the course of the farmer's tractor rally on Tuesday, some of the protesters unfurled their own flags by entering the premises of the Red Fort.

Farmers Meeting With the Supreme Court Committee Postponed To Jan 29 Due To the Traffic Restrictions

Due to the traffic restrictions after the violent protests broke out on Republic Day, the meeting of farmers with the Supreme Court Committee that was supposed to take place today was postponed to 29th January.

Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Judgment which said Groping without Skin Contact Not Sexual Assault under POCSO

The National Commission for Women (NCW) has challenged the Bombay High Court judgment where it stated that groping a child’s breasts without any ‘skin-to-skin’ contact will not be considered as sexual assault as defined under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Supreme Court Classifying Employees Based on Educational Qualifications for Promotion or Appointment Is Neither Violative of Article 14 nor of Article 16

This case concerns the dispute relating to the classification of employees belonging to the homogenous group based on educational qualifications. Brief facts of the case The...

Supreme Court Refuses To Transfer Petitions To Itself Related To ‘Love Jihad’ Filed in Allahabad High Court

On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to entertain the plea which was filed by the UP Government regarding the transfer of all the pleas challenging the ordinance the court passed, from Allahabad High Court to the Supreme Court.

Bombay HC Nagpur Bench Holds That Groping a Girl Without ‘Skin To Skin’ Contact Is Not Sexual Assault

The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court acquitted a man charged under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and convicted him of a minor offence under IPC stating that there was no direct physical contact.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -