Madhya Pradesh High Court Disposes of Plea to Postpone Rajya Sabha Elections

Must Read

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi,...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and...

Follow us

Dr. Aman Sharma filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. It challenges the notification number 37/2020 issued by the Election Commission.

Brief Facts of the Case

The Election Commission of India announced biennial Rajya Sabha elections on June 1, 2020. It will conduct an election for 24 seats from 10 states. The state of Madhya Pradesh represents three seats in the upcoming election. Madhya Pradesh has 230 seats in the State Legislative Assembly. It requires 52 votes to elect a Rajya Sabha member.

The ruling political party in the state, BJP has 107 members in the House. Whereas, the opposition, Congress, has 92 members to win one of the three seats.

However, the Assembly is currently not at its full strength. There have been 24 vacancies. On 23.3.2020, 22 ministers resigned leading to the fall of the government, leading to vacancies. Two seats are vacant on account of the demise of members. 

Thus, the petitioner filed a plea to postpone the elections in Madhya Pradesh.

 Polity 

The petition relies on Representation of People Act, 1950 to distinguish between the electoral college and Legislative Assemblies. Several sections of Representation of People’s Act, 1951 lays down functions and duties of the Election Commission of India. While, Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961 entails the procedure of calculating votes for a winning candidate. In the present case, its usage is to explain the calculation of enough quota. Rules 71 to 85 explain this quota.  

Submissions of the Petitioner 

The petitioner has challenged the notification regarding Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly. As per Schedule II of the said Act, Madhya Pradesh determines 230 seats. Due to the 24 vacancies, representation of 1/10th of the House will not be possible.

Moreover, only 207 members will cast a vote to determine sufficient quota. This will be the basis for further counting and declaration of result. Hence, there will be a deprivation of the right to vote for 24 members of the Assembly. This will lead to an unfair election. 

The petitioner has distinguished the electoral procedure between States and Union Territories. Section 27 (J) of the Act provides for Rajya Sabha elections despite vacancies in case of union territories. Nevertheless, Legislative Assemblies do not come under its ambit.

Assertion of the Plea

“As the elections to the Rajya Sabha are held by transferable votes, therefore sufficient quota must be determined for counting of votes, and there will be the wrong quota unless the vacancies are filled. Therefore, the holding of polling and counting on June 19, 2020, is illegal, unconstitutional and without jurisdiction.” 

Furthermore, Article 329 preventing Court interference in electoral matters cannot bar the petition. It referred to Supreme Court judgment in Election Commission of India v. Ashok (2000). It held that election commission’s action or order would be open for judicial review.

The petition also works out the math that calculates the sufficient quota, i.e. 2886. However, due to 24 vacancies, it becomes 2813 leading to erroneous counting.

Section 151 and 147 of the Representation of People’s Act, 1951 binds election commission. Elections should be held within six months of vacancies. Section 147 relates to the filling of casual vacancies in the council of states. Thus, election notification should have been issued only after filling 24 vacancies in legislative Assembly. 

Court’s Decision

Chief Justice A.K. Mittal and Justice V. K. Shukla decided the present matter in WP/ 8411/ 2020. The petition stands disposed.

Conduction of the Rajya Sabha elections will be as per schedule on June 19, 2020. 


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

 

Latest News

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Germany had violated the...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Supreme Court Asks Petitioner to Approach Bombay High Court in PIL for CBI Probe in Disha Salian Case

On the 26th of October 2020, the Apex Court heard the PIL praying for a CBI probe into the death of Disha Salian. The...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -