Kerala High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Notification of Bar Council on Spot Admission

Must Read

“Dismissal Without Inquiry Is Justified if Employee Did Not Prove Minimum Working Period”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the dispute relating to the termination of an employee without any disciplinary inquiry. Brief facts of the...

“Rape Victim To Be Provided Shelter Due To Media Attention Prohibited Under Section 228A of the IPC”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the petition by a rape victim for rehabilitation as she was social ostracization.  Brief facts of the...

Benefit of Probation Not Excluded by the Provisions of Mandatory Minimum Sentence Under Section 397 of Ipc

This case concerns the dispute regarding the granting of probation on good conduct to the accused under the age...

Supreme Court Asks for the Centre’s Response on PIL Filed Seeking the Formation of a Media Tribunal

The Supreme Court sought responses from the Press Council of India (PCI), News Broadcasters Association (NBA) on a PIL which sought to set up a media tribunal to tackle issues concerning the media like complaints against media, channels, and networks. Media has become like an unruly horse that has to be tamed to express the plea.

Law Student Asked the Supreme Court To Take Suo Moto Cognizance of the Violent Farmer Protests

A law student of Mumbai University, Ashish Rai has asked the Supreme Court to take Suo Moto Cognizance of the insult to the national flag done by the farmer protests at the Red Fort. In the course of the farmer's tractor rally on Tuesday, some of the protesters unfurled their own flags by entering the premises of the Red Fort.

Farmers Meeting With the Supreme Court Committee Postponed To Jan 29 Due To the Traffic Restrictions

Due to the traffic restrictions after the violent protests broke out on Republic Day, the meeting of farmers with the Supreme Court Committee that was supposed to take place today was postponed to 29th January.

Follow us

On 23rd November 2020, the Kerala High Court involving a single bench judge of the Honourable Smt. Justice P.V. Asha heard the case of Cisly Grashious vs State Of Kerala.

Facts of the Case

The writ petition was filed by students who secured admission in Law Colleges on the basis of rank in the entrance examination for the 3 year LLB course in Kerala. The first option of both the petitioners was Government Law College, Ernakulam. Smt.Cisly Grashious, one of the petitioners was Rank No. 249 who got admission in a self-financed College at Poothotta and Smt. Shabana Yasmin, the other petitioner ranked no. 416 who got admission in the Muslim category in Government Law College, Thrissur.

Both of them appeared in the spot admission conducted on 27.10.2020 against the seats which were vacant after the process of allotment. The Commissioner for Entrance Examination issued a notification dated 16.11.2020 directing the respective Principals of the Law Colleges to conduct spot admission as against the 10% seats additionally sanctioned by the Bar Council provided they received approval from the Bar Council as well as orders from the Government. It was ordered that only those candidates who are included in the rank list published by the Commissioner for Entrance Examination but have not got admission in any Law Colleges so far, shall be considered against the 10% seats additionally sanctioned.

The Principal of Government Law College, Ernakulam issued a notification on 19.11.2020 announcing that spot admission would be conducted on 24.11.2020 against the seats remaining vacant under the EWS quota and against the 10% seats additionally sanctioned by the Bar Council. This notification also contained the very same condition that only those who are included in the rank list and who have not been admitted so far alone would be considered in the spot admission. The petitioners challenged this condition.

Petitioner’s Arguments

According to the petitioners, there is already a rank list or the spot admission conducted and therefore only after exhausting that list, the Principals shall make further admissions.  It was their contention that the merit will be sacrificed in case only those who are not given admission so far are admitted. The learned counsel also pointed out that spot admission cannot be conducted against the additionally sanctioned seats, unlike the seats which remained vacant after conducting allotment in the regular process.

Respondent’s Arguments

According to the learned Government Pleader, a decision has been taken not to permit those who already got admission in order to see that there is finality in the process of admission. In case those who already got admission are allowed to participate and they are admitted, the seats which are presently occupied by them would have again to be filled up and the process would go on. Relying on the judgment in Arvind Kumar Kankane v. State of U.P. and others the learned Government Pleader argued that there is no illegality in fixing the condition.

Court’s Observation

The court observed into the case  Arvind Kumar Kankane v. State of U.P. and others, held -: It is clear that once an option is exercised by a candidate on the basis of which he is allotted the subject and thereafter that candidate is allowed to participate in subsequent counselling and his seat becomes vacant, the process of counselling will be endless and, as apprehended by the High Court, it may not be possible to complete the academic course within the stipulated period.

Court’s Decision

The Court dismissed the petition. The Court opined that it cannot be said that the decision taken by the Commissioner for Entrance Examination that the additional seats, as well as vacancies, shall be filled up only from among those who did not get admission, suffers from any illegality.

Click here to view the original judgment


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

“Dismissal Without Inquiry Is Justified if Employee Did Not Prove Minimum Working Period”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the dispute relating to the termination of an employee without any disciplinary inquiry. Brief facts of the case The Respondent, Smt. Sureshwati was...

“Rape Victim To Be Provided Shelter Due To Media Attention Prohibited Under Section 228A of the IPC”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the petition by a rape victim for rehabilitation as she was social ostracization.  Brief facts of the case In this case, a writ...

Benefit of Probation Not Excluded by the Provisions of Mandatory Minimum Sentence Under Section 397 of Ipc

This case concerns the dispute regarding the granting of probation on good conduct to the accused under the age of twenty-one years.   Brief facts of...

Supreme Court Asks for the Centre’s Response on PIL Filed Seeking the Formation of a Media Tribunal

The Supreme Court sought responses from the Press Council of India (PCI), News Broadcasters Association (NBA) on a PIL which sought to set up a media tribunal to tackle issues concerning the media like complaints against media, channels, and networks. Media has become like an unruly horse that has to be tamed to express the plea.

Law Student Asked the Supreme Court To Take Suo Moto Cognizance of the Violent Farmer Protests

A law student of Mumbai University, Ashish Rai has asked the Supreme Court to take Suo Moto Cognizance of the insult to the national flag done by the farmer protests at the Red Fort. In the course of the farmer's tractor rally on Tuesday, some of the protesters unfurled their own flags by entering the premises of the Red Fort.

Farmers Meeting With the Supreme Court Committee Postponed To Jan 29 Due To the Traffic Restrictions

Due to the traffic restrictions after the violent protests broke out on Republic Day, the meeting of farmers with the Supreme Court Committee that was supposed to take place today was postponed to 29th January.

Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Judgment which said Groping without Skin Contact Not Sexual Assault under POCSO

The National Commission for Women (NCW) has challenged the Bombay High Court judgment where it stated that groping a child’s breasts without any ‘skin-to-skin’ contact will not be considered as sexual assault as defined under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Supreme Court Classifying Employees Based on Educational Qualifications for Promotion or Appointment Is Neither Violative of Article 14 nor of Article 16

This case concerns the dispute relating to the classification of employees belonging to the homogenous group based on educational qualifications. Brief facts of the case The...

Supreme Court Refuses To Transfer Petitions To Itself Related To ‘Love Jihad’ Filed in Allahabad High Court

On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to entertain the plea which was filed by the UP Government regarding the transfer of all the pleas challenging the ordinance the court passed, from Allahabad High Court to the Supreme Court.

Bombay HC Nagpur Bench Holds That Groping a Girl Without ‘Skin To Skin’ Contact Is Not Sexual Assault

The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court acquitted a man charged under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and convicted him of a minor offence under IPC stating that there was no direct physical contact.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -